Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
polarization
-maintaining
low-contrast
[ K. Suzuki,
Opt. Express 9, linear fiber
676 (2001) ] (large area)
[ J. C. Knight et al.,
Elec. Lett. 34,
1347 (1998) ]
Preform Construction
Tubes are packed in a hexagonal shape with hollow,
solid, birefringent, doped or tubular core elements.
Multi-Core Preform
Drawing PCF
Preform of packed tubes is drawn in a draw tower
furnace
Fiber Draw Tower @ MIT
building 13, constructed 2000–2001
~6 meter
(20 feet)
research
tower
Challenges:
( )
∇ × [ s ]−1 ∇ × E − k 02 n 2 [ s ]E = 0
[ K ]{E} = k n [ M ]{E}
2 2
0 eff
⎡{Et }⎤
{E} = ⎢ ⎥
⎣ z ⎦
{ E }
[K], [M] : FEM matrices
neff : effective index
neff = β / k0
Vector Finite Element Method (VFEM)
Basic equation
( )
∇ × [ s ]−1 ∇ × E − k 02 n 2 [ s ]E = 0
E = e ( x, y ) exp( − γz )
FEM γ= α + j β
propagation constant
attenuation constant
[ K ]{E} = γ [ M ]{E}2
Group-velocity dispersion
λ neff
2
d
Confinement loss D=−
c dλ2
Lc = 8.686 α [dB/m] neff = β / k0
PHOTONIC CRYSTAL FIBERS (PCFS)
Imagem SEM
PHOTONIC CRYSTAL FIBERS (PCFS)
Tratamento da Imagem
PHOTONIC CRYSTAL FIBERS (PCFS)
Discretização
Empirical Relation for Photonic Crystal Fiber (PCF) Design
à single-mode operation
à dispersion
à birefringence
à PMD
à confinement loss
à effective area
à MFD
à beam divergence
à wavelength, λ à NA
à hole pitch, Λ à bending loss
à hole diameter, d à splice loss
à number of rings, N à effective nonlinearity
Effective V Parameter (Normalized Frequency)
à Conventional V parameter
2π
V= a nco2 − ncl2
λ
2π
U= a nco2 − neff
2
λ
2π SIF
W= 2
a neff − ncl2
λ
λ
* M. Koshiba and K. Saitoh, Opt. Lett.,
vol. 29, pp. 1739-1741, Aug. 2004. PCF
V parameter for PCFs
à Normalized frequency
2π
V= aeff nco2 − nFSM
2
Vc = V (λ c ) = 2.405
Effective Cladding Index
2π ⎛λ d⎞ A2 (d / Λ )
V= aeff nco2 − nFSM
2
V ⎜ , ⎟ = A1 (d / Λ ) +
λ ⎝Λ Λ⎠ 1 + A3 (d / Λ ) exp{ A4 (d / Λ )λ / Λ}
aeff = Λ / 3 ⎛d⎞
i1b
⎛d⎞
i2 b
⎛d⎞
i3 b
Ai = ai 0 + ai1 ⎜ ⎟ + ai 2 ⎜ ⎟ + ai 3 ⎜ ⎟ (i = 1 to 4)
⎝Λ⎠ ⎝Λ⎠ ⎝Λ⎠
w 1.619 2.879
= 0.65 + 3 / 2 +
aeff V V6
λ −1
θ = tan
πw
* M.J. Gander, R. McBride, J.C.D. Jones, T.A. Birks, J.C. Knight, P.St.J. Russell,
P.M. Blanchard, J.G. Burnett, and A.H. Greenaway, Opt. Lett., vol. 24,
pp. 1017-1019, Aug. 1999.
** N.A. Mortensen, J.R. Folken, P.M.W. Skovgaad, and J. Broeng,
IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 1094-1096, Aug. 2002.
Splice Losses between a PCF and a SMF
⎧⎪⎛ 2 w w ⎞ 2 ⎛ − 2δ 2
⎞⎫⎪
LS = −10 log10 ⎨⎜⎜ 2 SMF 2 ⎟⎟ exp⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟⎬ [dB]
⎪⎩⎝ SMF
w + w ⎠ ⎝ w + w 2
SMF ⎠⎪⎭
wSMF : modal spot size of SMF
δ : transverse offset
δ=0
λ λ
λ λ
λ λ
V 2 = U 2 +W 2
Empirical Relation for W Parameter
2π ⎛λ d⎞ B2 (d / Λ )
W= 2
aeff neff − nFSM
2
W ⎜ , ⎟ = B1 (d / Λ ) +
λ ⎝Λ Λ⎠ 1 + B3 (d / Λ ) exp{B4 (d / Λ )λ / Λ}
aeff = Λ / 3 ⎛d⎞
d i1
⎛d⎞
di 2
⎛d⎞
di 3
Bi = ci 0 + ci1 ⎜ ⎟ + ci 2 ⎜ ⎟ + ci 3 ⎜ ⎟ (i = 1 to 4)
⎝Λ⎠ ⎝Λ⎠ ⎝Λ⎠
D=− + Dm
2 c dλ 2
⎛ Wλ ⎞
neff = n 2
−⎜ ⎟
FSM ⎜ 2πa ⎟
⎝ eff ⎠
* J. Sakai and T. Kimura, “Bending loss of propagation modes in arbitrary-index profile optical fibers,”
Appl. Opt., vol. 17, pp. 1499-1506, May 1978.
Effective Index Profile of Index-Guiding HF
effective
refractive
index
1.45
à Marcuse formula*
λU 3W ⎛ 2beff W ⎞
Lc = 8.686 × exp ⎜− ⎟
2 4 2
neff aeff V K1 (W ) ⎜ aeff ⎟
⎝ ⎠
mean
refractive
index
1.45
Λ: hole-to-hole spacing
di (i = 1 ~ n):
hole diameter of the
ith air-hole ring
d1 > d 2 = L = d n d 2 < d1 = d 3 = L = d n
(a) (b)
Λ = 2.0 μm Λ = 2.0 μm
d1 = 0.5 μm d1 = 0.5 μm
d 2 = 0.5 μm d 2 = 0.6 μm
d 3 = 0.5 μm d 3 = 0.6 μm
d 4 = 0.5 μm d 4 = 0.6 μm
(c) (d)
Λ = 2.0 μm Λ = 2.0 μm
d1 = 0.5 μm d1 = 0.5 μm
d 2 = 0.6 μm d 2 = 0.6 μm
d 3 = 0.7 μm d 3 = 0.7 μm
d 4 = 0.7 μm d 4 = 1.8 μm
(a) Λ = 2.0 μm, d1 = 0.5 μm, d 2 = 0.5 μm, d 3 = 0.5 μm, d 4 = 0.5 μm
(b) Λ = 2.0 μm, d1 = 0.5 μm, d 2 = 0.6 μm, d 3 = 0.6 μm, d 4 = 0.6 μm
(c) Λ = 2.0 μm, d1 = 0.5 μm, d 2 = 0.6 μm, d 3 = 0.7 μm, d 4 = 0.7 μm
(d) Λ = 2.0 μm, d1 = 0.5 μm, d 2 = 0.6 μm, d 3 = 0.7 μm, d 4 = 1.8 μm
Conventional Dispersion-Flattened PCF
λ = 1.55 μm
11 rings
Λ = 2.47 μm, d = 0.57 μm * Λ = 2.62 μm, d = 0.632 μm * *
* W.H. Reeves et al., Opt. Express, ** A. Ferrando et al., Opt. Express,
vol. 10, pp. 609-613, July 2002. vol. 9, pp. 687-697, Dec. 2001.
PCF with Ultra-Low and Ultra-Flattened Dispersion
Λ = 1.6 μm
d1 = 0.47 μm, d 2 = 0.71 μm, d 3 = 0.74 μm
d 4 = 0.62 μm, d 5 = L = d10 = 0.65 μm
Leakage Loss and Effective Core Area
R = 15 mm PC
ONU
R = 5 mm
3.2 dB/km @ 1.55 μm and 7.1 dB/km @ 0.85 μm 1 dB/km @ 1.55 μm and 2 dB/km @ 1.31 μm
H. Kubota, K. Suzuki, S. Kawanishi, M. Nakazawa, K. Tajima, K. Nakajima, K. Kurokawa, N. Yoshizawa,
M. Tanaka, and M. Fujita, CLEO/QELS 2001, CPD3, May 2001. and M. Ohashi, OFC 2002, ThS3, Mar. 2002.
0.37 dB/km @ 1.55 μm and 0.71 dB/km @ 1.31 μm 0.28 dB/km @ 1.55 μm and 0.35 dB/km @ 1.31 μm
K. Tajima, J. Zhou, K. Nakajima, and K. Sato, K. Tajima, J. Zhou, K. Kurokawa, and K. Nakajima,
OFC 2003, PD1, Mar. 2003. ECOC-IOOC 2003, Th4.1.6, Sept. 2003.
Basic Design Strategy of
Single-Mode Hole-Assisted Fiber
The cutoff wavelength is defined such as the leakage loss of the higher-order mode being 22 dB/m.
The Germanium concentration of the core is assumed to be set up to the level of 0.36 %.
Dependence of the Cutoff Wavelength on the Allowable Bending Radius
If the total bending loss for 10 turns is less than 0.5 dB at 1.65 μm,
then the radius of each turn is defined as the allowable bending radius.
Dependence of the Cutoff Wavelength and the Allowable Bending
Radius on Air-Hole Diameter of the Second Ring
splicing point
Ave. = 0.08 dB
Step2 Step3
Burner collapsing
Attaching connector