Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Weber Ursi
Guilherme de Arajo Almeida
1. Introduo
8 9 10
11 12
13 14 15
16 17 18
Figura 5 a 18 - Paciente adulto Classe II com apinhamento severo inferior e sobremordida profunda.
22
23
Figura 19 a 23 - Fase de correo da sobremordida com bite-turbo colado na lingual dos incisivos
superiores e da correo do overjet com elsticos de Classe II 5/16.
24 25 26
27
31 32
33 34 35
36 37
Figura 28 a 37 - Caso finalizado com uma boa intercuspidao e uma boa relao interarcos tanto no
sentido vertical quanto no sagital.
O Caso clnico 2 ilustra a correo de acentuado apinhamento inferior e moderado superior em paciente adulto
utilizando braquetes autoligveis.
38 39 40
41 42 43
44 45 46
Figura 38 a 46 - Paciente adulta com m ocluso de Classe I, sobremordida de 80%, apinhamento moderado superior e acentuado inferior. Perfil facial reto
e exposio dos incisivos no sorriso de 100%.
49 50
51 52
Figura 47 a 52 - Utilizou-se uma mecnica com braquetes autoligveis estticos canaleta .022 da
Marca comercial GAC, In-ovation C. Optou-se pelo nivelamento com arcos de NiTi termo-ativados .014
superior e .012 inferior. Note na figura 48 que o braquete do dente 31 foi invertido propositadamente
1800, pois a mordida profunda inviabilizava a colagem correta do mesmo, uma vez que a tampa da cana-
leta de cromo-cobalto mais espessa no sentido vertical e horizontal.
53 54 55
56 57
63 64 65
66 67 68
Referncias
1. AndrewsLF. The straight wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin 17. Tabakman V. Evaluation of frictional resistance in resin self-ligating bracket, stainless
Orthod. 1976 Feb;10(2):99-114. steel self-ligating bracket and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2. Berger JL. The SPEED appliance: a 14 year update on this unique self-ligating 2005 Aug;128(2):263-4.
orthodontic mechanism. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994 Mar;105(3):217-23. 18. Taloumis LJ, Smith TM. Force decay and deformation of orthodontic elastomeric
3. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Ricciardi A, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation ligatures. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jan;111(1):1-11.
of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket- 19. Tecco S, Festa F, Caputi S, Traini T, Di Iorio D, DAttilio M. Friction of conventional
archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003 Oct;124(4):395-402. and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model. Angle Orthod. 2005
4. Drescher D, Bourauel C, Shumacher HA. Frictional forces between bracket and arch Nov;75(6):1041-5.
wire. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989 Nov;96(5):397-404. 20. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Resistance to sliding of self-ligation brackets versus
5. Eberting JJ, Straja SR, Tuncay OC. Comparison of treatment time, results and conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and
patient satisfaction between Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res. wet (saliva) states. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Oct;120(4):361-70.
2001;4(4):228-34. 21. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-
6. Harradine NW. Self-ligation brackets: where are we now? J Orthod. 2003 ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry saliva states. Am J Orthod
Sep;30(3):262-73. Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 May;121(5):472-82.
7. Harradine NW. Northcroft memorial lecture: self ligation: past, present and future. J 22. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of arch wire size and material on the resistance to
Orthod. 2009 Dec;36(4):260-71. sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J
8. Hain M, Dhopatkar A,Rock P. A comparison of different ligation methods on friction. Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Sep;122(3):295-305.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Nov;130(5):666-70. 23. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of ligation type and method on the resistance to
9. Henao S, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self- sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet
ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Angle states. Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):418-30.
Orthod. 2004 Apr;74(2):202-11. 24. Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs. sef-ligating brackets:
10. Henao S, Kusy RP. Frictional evaluations and dental typodont models using four self- effects of archwire size and material. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007
ligating designs and a conventional design. Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):75-85. Mar;131(3):395-99.
11. Kapur R, Sinha PK, Nanda RS. Frictional resistance of the Damon SL bracket. J Clin 25. Voudouris JC. Seven clinical principles of interactive twin mechanisms. J Clin Orthod.
Orthod. 1998 Aug;32(8):485-9. 1997 Jan;31(1):55-65.
12. Maijer R, Smith DC. Time savings with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1990 26. Voudouris JC. Interactive Edgewise mechanism: form and function comparison
Jan;24(1):29-31. with conventional Edgewise brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997
13. Melsen B, Allais D. Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during Feb;111(2):119-40.
labial movement of lower incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. 27. Tagawa D. From good to great, The Damon system vs conventional appliances: A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 May;127(5):552-61. comparative study. Clin Impressions. 2006;15(1):4.
14. Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 versus conventional twin 28. Pringle AM, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ, McKnight M. Prospective randomized clinical
brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod. 2006 May;76(3):480-5. trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracket systems. Am J
15. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):160-7.
treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and 29. Fleming PS, Dibiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Pain experience during initial alignment with
dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Aug;132(2):208-15. a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. A randomized
16. Rinchuse D, Miles PG. Self-ligating brackets: Present and future. Am J Orthod controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2009 Jan;79(1):46-50.
Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Aug;132(2):216-22.