Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
ISSN 1678-5975
Novembro - 2005
N 3
59-70
Porto Alegre
RESUMO
A plataforma continental Atlntica do Rio Grande do Sul e Uruguai
foi utilizada como laboratrio natural para testar as relaes entre propriedades
de tamanho de gro e ambiente sedimentar.
A evoluo Pleistoceno/Holoceno da regio foi intensamente
estudada atravs de um mapeamento detalhado, e de estudos sedimentolgicos
e estratigrficos, oferecendo, dessa forma, uma excelente oportunidade para
esse tipo de trabalho.
Acumulaes de areia e cascalho, vinculadas a nveis de estabilizao
identificados da transgresso Holocnica, localizados nas isbatas de 110-120
e 20-30 metros, fornecem elementos confiveis relacionados com a fonte,
transporte e nvel de energia de deposio e podem ser utilizados como linhas
de evidencias na interpretao ambiental.
ABSTRACT
The Atlantic Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and Uruguay inner
continental shelf was used as a natural laboratory to test the relationship
between grain-size properties and sedimentary environment.
The Pleistocene/Holocene evolution of the region was intensively
studied through detailed mapping, sedimentological and stratigraphic research
thus offering an excellent opportunity of developing this type of work.
Sand and gravel deposits linked with identified stillstands of the
Holocene transgression located at 110-120 and 20-30 meters isobath provided
elements related to the source, transport and depositional energy level and can
be used as a tool for environmental interpretation.
60
INTRODUCTION
During
the
last
four
decades,
sedimentologists from of all over world have been
interested in obtaining environmental information
from grain-size analysis of sand and gravel mainly
related with coastal areas. For a partial list of
references (see MARTINS et al., 1997 and
MARTINS, 2003).
Grain-size
distribution
reflects
depositional processes and combined with other
lines of evidence (roundness, sphericity, grain
surface texture, detrital light and heavy minerals,
biogenic components, syngenic minerals etc) could
be
used
for
sedimentary
environment
identification.
Erosion, progradation and reworking of
sediments are important shore and nearshore
processes, and it is necessary to understand the
changes produced near the modern shoreline in
order to interpret the origin and depositional
aspects of the preserved sediments.
The size distribution of sand or sandstone
is one of its fundamental properties, because it
largely determines porosity and permeability,
provides insight to transport processes and has
been used by geologists to determine the
environment of deposition of ancient sandstones. It
is also closely related to the geotechnical properties
of sand.
Our interest is to test in marine modern
sands how well the size distribution properties can
discriminate between old riverine, eolian, beach
sands and gravels occurring along the continental
shelf, as it was studied on the actual adjacent
coastal plain (MARTINS, 1962, 1965, 1967, 2003
and MARTINS et al., 1997).
The data set of CECO/IG/UFRGS is
exceptionally adequate for such a study and offers
promising discrimination for at least five reasons:
a) all the analyzed modern terrigenous sands
were derived from a nearby source of
Pre-Cambrian and Phanerozoic rocks
rather than from multiple, distant sources;
b) the carbonate bioclastic sand and gravel
components are autochtonous;
c) the inner shelf and the coastal area have
been mapped in detail, so that the
environments of deposition of the
sampling area are known with precision
and carefully delimited;
d) these environments were sampled using
closely spaced sites, through the method
of suite samples rather than only few
e)
DISCUSSION
A large part of published papers is
devoted to understand how riverine, eolian, beach,
lagoon and lake processes transform the grain size
distribution of sand.
In the present exercise, the method
applied to characterize coastal sands and gravels
(beach, dune) are employed on sandy and gravelly
deposits of the inner and outer continental shelf of
southern Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and Uruguay
in the influence area of Rio de La Plata, in an
attempt to learn how they fit in similar shallow
marine deposits.
CRONAN (1972) working on polymodal
sediments from the Irish Sea consisting of varying
mixtures of gravel, sand, silt and clay, discussed
the usefulness of the grain-size parameters in
characterizing sedimentary processes.
Zones of positive and negative skewness
alternate in the basin and this behavior can be
largely explained in terms of variations in the
proportions of the various grain-size populations in
the sediments. The strongly positively skewed
sediments consist of sandy gravels in wich the
gravel mode is predominant. As the proportion of
sand increases the sediment becomes less
positively skewed, passes through a zone of zero,
where the gravel and sand modes are subequal and
become negatively skewed as the sand mode
becomes predominant.
Variations in kurtosis can largely be
related to the degree of polymodality of the
sediments. MARTINS (1962) discussed the several
aspects of this statistical measures and established
that the grade of peakness of a grain-size
distribution reveals the relation of the sorting of the
central part of the curve in relation with the coarse
and the fine tail.
When both gravel and sand populations
are present in the sediment in more or less
subequal proportions, the kurtosis value is low
(platicurtic). With the increase of the sand
population, kurtosis value rises and then falls to
near normal as the sand approach unimodality.
According to CRONAN (1972) the interrelations between grain-size parameters found by
FOLK & WARD (1957) in fluvial and by
GRAVEL
61
RESULTS
These successive movements were
responsible for the migration of a high energy
shallow zone over the continental shelf that allows
the development of stillstands of the sea level and
the concentration of bioclastic carbonate (shells
and shell debris) forming linear shoals parallel to
the coastline. This situation is also favorable to the
development of calciferous sandstone beachrock
(quartzose sand cemented by calcium carbonate)
and coquina calcirudite (shell fragments
cemented by calcium carbonate) and calcarenite
(carbonate sand cemented by calcium carbonate).
GRAVEL
62
63
Table 1. Main Characteristics of the five facies chosen to test grain-size parameters and environment.
FACIES
INNER CONTINENTAL
SHELF
(Rio Grande do Sul Uruguay)
<50 m
OUTER CONTINENTAL
SHELF
(Rio Grande-Torres)
Rio Grande do Sul
>100 m
LA PLATA SHOAL
(Argentina)
Uruguay/Argentina
<50 m.
ALBARDO SHOAL
(Rio Grande do Sul)
Brazil
<50 m
CARPINTEIRO SHOAL
(Rio Grande do Sul)
Brazil
<50 m
CHARACTERISTICS
Quartzose sand (unimodal) with shell debris (bimodal), moderate to well
sorted, negatively skewed, meso to leptocurtic. Described as sand facies
(MARTINS, 1972) or Atlantic facies (LABORDE, 1999), cover old
Pleistocene coastal features (beaches, dunes, barriers, beachridges and
erosional steps) as a transgressive Holocene sand blanket related to migratory
coastal zones, of high energy level of sedimentation.
Relict/palimpsest sequence.
References: MARTINS et al. (1967, 1972, 1978, 1997, 1999, 2003);
LABORDE (1999); MARTINS &URIEN (1979).
Quartzose sand and carbonate sand and gravel of shallow waters, moderate to
well sorted, negative skewed. Bioclastic and terrigenous components showing
graded bedding, indicating presence of storm action over shallow waters at the
sea level 110/120 m.
Relict sequence.
References: MARTINS et al. (1967, 1977, 1989); MARTINS & MARTINS
(1985); DILLENBURG (1990).
Quartzose sand and bioclastic sand and gravel. Bioclastic material formed by
entire and fragmented shells and slabs of beachrock. Occurs as elongated
shoals parallel to de bathymetric contours. Relict feature of an old barrier
island, that closes partially the estuary when the sea level was at 20/30 meters.
References: URIEN & MOUZO (1968); URIEN & OTTMANN (1971);
MARTINS & URIEN (1979); URIEN et al. (1980a e b, 1995); MARTINS et
al. (2003).
Quartzose sand and bioclastic sand and gravel. Poor to well sorted, negatively
skewed. Occurs through elongated shoals parallel to subparallel to the
Pleistocene (relict) and its sedimentary material reworked through Holocene
and modern dynamics.
References: MARTINS et al. (1972); CORRA & PONZI (1978); CALLIARI
et al. (1999).
Calcareous shell fragments, sand and gravel of high calcium carbonate content
associated with terrigenous coarse to fine quartzose relict sand. Quartzose fine
sand with bioclastic ash is well sorted. Medium sand with higher content of
bioclastic gravel is moderately sorted. Beachrock pavement is an important
bottom component.
References: CALLIARI et al. (1994); BUCHMANN & TOMAZELLI (2003).
GRAVEL
64
c) La Plata shoal
One of the most important concentration
of bioclastic rich sand and bioclastic sand and
gravel, related with and ancient coastal barrier,
linked with sea level fluctuations.
d) Carpinteiro shoal
Through
an
OSNLR-COMEMIR
mission, CALLIARI et al. (1994) identified five
textures: 1) muddy fine sand, 2) fine sand with
bioclastics, 3) shelly gravel, 4) shelly gravel and
relict sand and 5) beachrock outcrops. This
sedimentary cover represents another area of the
presence of material from different sources:
CARPINTEIRO
SHOAL
ALBARDO
SHOAL
FACIES
QUARTZOSE SAND WITH
OR WITHOUT SHELL ASH
BIOCLASTIC SAND AND
GRAVEL
CLEAN QUARTZOSE SAND
QUARTZOSE SAND WITH
BIOCLASTIC MATERIAL
QUARTZOSE SAND WITH
BIOCLASTIC MATERIAL
BIOCLASTIC GRAVEL
BIOCLASTIC GRAVEL AND
RELICT COARSE SAND
QUARTZOSE SAND WITH
BIOCLASTIC MATERIAL
BIOCLASTIC GRAVEL
BIOCLASTIC GRAVEL
WITH RELICT COARSE
SAND
BIOCLASTIC SANDY
GRAVEL
BIOCLASTIC COARSE SAND
Mz
SK1
Kg
2-3
0.35-1.00
Negative
Leptocurtic
-1.50-0.50
1.32-0.88
Negative
2-3 (2.61)
0.30-0.52
Negative
Meso to
Leptocurtic
Leptocurtic
2-3 (2.36)
0.98-1.73
Negative
Leptocurtic
>2.0
0.35-1.00
Negative
Leptocurtic
1.0-2.0
0.5-1.00
Negative
Mesocurtic
-3.0-1.0
0.5-1.50
Negative
Platicurtic
3-4
0.35-1.00
Negative
Leptocurtic
-2-2
1.0-2.0
Negative
Meso to
Leptocurtic
0-2
1.0-3.0
Negative
Meso to
Leptocurtic
-4-2
1.0-2.0
Negative
Mesocurtic
-3-3
1.0-2.0
Negative
Mesocurtic
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
65
66
GRAVEL
67
GRAVEL
68
REFERENCES
BALSILLIE, J. H.; DONOGHUE, J. F.; BUTLER,
K. M. & KOCH, J. 2002. Plotting Equation for
Gaussian Percentiles and Spreadsheet Program
for generating probability plots. Journal of
Sedimentary Research, vol. 72 (6): 929-943,
Tulsa, USA.
BALSILLIE, J. H.; DONOGHUE, J. F.; BUTLER,
K. M. & KOCH, J. 2003. Plotting Equation for
Gaussian Percentiles and Spreadsheet Program
for generating probability plots Reply.
Journal of Sedimentary Geology, vol. 73(6):
1086-87, Tulsa, USA.
BUCHMANN, F. S. C. & TOMAZELLI, L. J.
2003. Relict Nearshore Shoals of Rio Grande
do Sul, Southern Brazil. Origin and Effects on
Nearby Modern Beaches. Journal of Coastal
GRAVEL
69
GRAVEL
70
GRAVEL