Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
COSMÉTICO
RAYKAMI
A concentração usual é de 1%
Sérum revitalizante
Raykami 1%
Skinperf 2%
Sérum 30 g
Aplicar em toda a face
Sérum protetor
Raykami 1%
EPS White 1%
Sérum 30g
Aplicar em toda a face
Proteção cutânea
Raykami 1%
Ext. portulaca 0,5%
Gel base 30 g
Aplicar em toda a face
3. % OF USE RECOMMENDED: 1%
6. MANUFACTURING PROCESS :
Process: Hot extraction from Artemisia capillaris. The extract is then filtered and sterilized by
filtration.
Starting substances: Artemisia capillaris
Solvent: water
Physical form: liquid
7. SPECIFIC STATEMENTS :
Product sold for topical cosmetic application and therefore exempt from TSCA as it is regulated
as a cosmetic under the FDA. Does not contain or come into contact with any ingredients of
animal origin and is therefore considered to be BSE/TSE free.
Keywords: Blue light damage, phototoxicity, plant extract, cell damage prevention/repair, fibroblasts
This publication was originally presented at the 30th IFSCC Congress in Munich, Germany, September 18 - 21,
2018.
INTRODUCTION enough to disrupt the circadian rhythm dine dimers. Nevertheless, it causes indi-
and therefore, indirectly, skin biology. rect damage through chromophores that
Skin protects the body from external ag- That is one reason why electronic device absorb the rays, entering an “excited”
gression, whether chemical (solvents, manufacturers offer a “night” display state and generating reactive oxygen spe-
allergens, etc.), biological (infectious mode more compatible with our biologi- cies and free radicals in return [4 - 10]. Be-
agents) or physical (mechanical, heat, ra- cal clock [3]. cause blue light wavelengths range from
diation). Solar radiation is made up of elec- 400 nm to 500 nm, the chromophores
tromagnetic waves of varying wavelength More recently, several independent stud- involved are different from those excited
ranging from gamma rays (the shortest) ies have demonstrated the phototoxicity by other wavelengths, such as UV rays.
to radio waves (the longest). Only a small of blue light on skin cell populations. Un- Recent research suggests that the damage
amount of solar radiation reaches the like UV rays, it does not have enough ener- caused by blue light probably results from
Earth’s surface, but the skin is exposed gy to directly damage nucleic acids, which “flavin”- or “porphyrin”-type photosensi-
to enough of it to cause premature ag- can cause modifications in the structure of tizers [8]. Interestingly, cytochrome C has
ing and, therefore, a loss of function [1]. the DNA double helix by forming pyrimi- a high absorption rate for wavelengths
UV rays are the highest-energy rays to
which we are exposed. They can be divid-
ed into three subcategories depending on Abstract were measured. Human skin explants
the wavelength: UVA (400 - 315 nm), UVB were exposed to blue light or control
(315 - 280 nm) and UVC (280 - 100 nm). Skin is exposed to the natural source light to quantify damaged keratino-
Researchers studying the phototoxicity of of visible light, the sun, but due to our cytes, COX-2 positive cells and protein
solar radiation have shown that the UV way of life we are increasingly exposed carbonylation. Blue light significantly
effects range from a simple sun rash to to the blue light emitted by the light- decreased cellular viability, stimulated
more serious pathologies such as skin can- emitting diodes found in the lighting of cellular oxidation, inhibited the synthe-
cer [1 - 2]. most of our digital screens (TV, comput- sis of ATP and decreased contraction
ers, laptops, smartphones, and tablets). of the collagen lattice. Moreover, it
Unlike UV rays, visible light was long con- The side effect of blue light on the eyes significantly increased altered epider-
sidered relatively safe. With advances in was previously described but only little mal cells in human skin, COX-2 posi-
studies of human diseases mainly caused information is available about the ef- tive cells, and carbonylation. Artemisia
by aging, its phototoxicity has been taken fects on skin. We evaluated the effects capillaris extract provided significant
more seriously. Blue light has some inter- of blue light on human skin cells using protection from all the effects on
esting characteristics because it emits the in vitro and ex vivo models and tested fibroblasts induced by blue light
most energy in the visible spectrum and the protective effects of an Artemisia and significantly decreased altered
deeply penetrates the skin. It can reach capillaris extract. Human dermal fibro- cells, COX-2 cells and carbonylated
the dermis, while most UV rays do not get blasts were exposed to blue light or a proteins in skin explants. It has a
past the epidermis. Computer, phone and control light and then the cellular via- protective effect against blue light-
tablet screens emit blue light. It has been bility, oxidation, ATP and carbonylation induced aging.
shown that these artificial light sources are
Samples
The human skin explants and fibroblasts
were drawn from healthy human donors
during plastic surgery after informing
them and obtaining their consent.
Culture medium
The samples (explants or cells) were grown
in a culture medium comprising DMEM,
supplemented by 10 % of fetal calf serum,
and 100 U / ml of penicillin / streptomycin.
During exposure to the various light sourc- Figure 1 Effect of ACE 0.1 % on fibroblast cell viability after a five-hour exposure to blue light.
SCIENTIFIC PAPER
the manufacturer(s) to measure ATP. Ex- The lattices were made from a fibroblast area. This number was used to measure
periments were performed on fibroblasts. culture and a collagen solution. After po- the phototoxicity of blue light. COX-2
lymerization, lattice contraction was mea- immunohistology staining was done to
ROS measurement sured by photography at various times and quantify tissue inflammation.
The CM-H2DCFDA indicator (Thermo expressed in % of free area within the well.
Fisher, Strasbourg, France) and a BMG Protein carbonylation
Fluostar microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Cell / tissue alteration Protein carbonylation of human skin ex-
Paris, France) were used following the in- The alteration of human skin explants af- plants was measured by a Western blot
structions of the manufacturer(s) to mea- ter blue light exposure was assessed by test or by fluorescence microscopy (anti-
sure ROS production. Experiments were histology after hematoxylin/eosin staining. DNP antibody) immediately after exposure
performed on fibroblasts. The number of pyknotic cells was counted (T0) or after 6 hours (T1). Total proteins
were visualized using the SyproRuby re-
agent in microscopy or quantified by a
Bradford assay.
Statistical analyses
The raw data underwent appropriate Stu-
dent t tests. As part of the protein car-
bonylation study the data were subjected
to a Bonferroni multiple comparison test.
The findings were considered significant
for a significance threshold of 5 % (*,
p < 0.05). If the value of p wa lower at
0.01 and 0.001, the rating was **p < 0.01
and ***p < 0.001, respectively.
SCIENTIFIC PAPER
The present study confirms recent reports
demonstrating blue light phototoxicity
in human skin. In our experiments, all
samples exposed to blue light displayed
reduced fitness. Fibroblasts showed de-
creased cell vitality, reduced ATP synthesis
and increased ROS production after blue
light exposure compared with the con-
trols. Human skin explants were also nega-
tively altered, with an increased number
of pyknotic cells and COX-2 staining per
fixed surface of observation.
Acknowledgements
References
Figure 6 A: Quantitative analysis of COX-2 expression in the epidermis.
B: Quantitative analysis of COX-2 expression in the dermis. [1] Yaar, M., and Gilchrest, B.A., Photoaging:
mechanism, prevention and therapy. Br. J.
score. It is known that blue light pen- latter was never directly exposed to light Dermatol., 157 (2007) 874–887.
etrates deeper than UVA into the skin, (Figure 7A). Blue light exposure also
reaching the dermis while most of the increased the carbonyl score compared [2] El Ghissassi, F., Baan, R., Straif, K., Grosse,
UV rays do not get past the epidermis with the controls. Artemisia capillaris ex- Y., Secretan, B., Bouvard, V., Benbrahim-
[13 - 14]. Overall, human skin explants tract, applied topically, provided efficient Tallaa, L., Guha, N., Freeman, C., Galichet,
exposed to blue light displayed a much protection against blue light since ob- L. and Cogliano, V., A review of human
higher protein carbonylation level at T0 servable carbonylation (Figure 7A) and carcinogens--part D: radiation. Lancet.
and T1 compared with the controls (Fig- carbonyl score for 1 % Artemisia capillaris Oncol., 10 (2009) 751-752.
ure 7A). Importantly, blue light-induced extract-treated human skin explants were
damage was not restricted to epidermal both significantly reduced by 25 % at T0 [3] Tosini, G., Ferguson, I. and Tsubota, K.,
cells since increases in protein carbonyl- (p < 0.001, 88 % protection, Figure 7B) Effects of blue light on the circadian sys-
ation were observed both in the epider- and 24 % at T1 (p < 0.001, 100 % protec- tem and eye physiology. Mol. Vis., 22
mis and dermis despite the fact that the tion, Figure 7B). (2016) 61-72.
Figure 7 A: Visualization of in-situ carbonylated proteins in the skin. B: Effect of ACE 1 % on protein carbonylation caused by blue light.
[4] Mizutani, T., Sumida, H., Sagawa, Y., Okano, Y. [5] Godley, B.F., Shamsi, F.A., Liang, F.Q., Jar- [6] Liebmann, J., Born, M., Kolb-Bachofen,
and Masaki, H., Carbonylated proteins exposed rett, S.G., Davies, S., Boulton, M., Blue light V., Blue-light irradiation regulates prolif-
to UVA and to blue light generate reactive oxy- induces mitochondrial DNA damage and eration and differentiation in human skin
gen species through a type I photosensitizing free radical production in epithelial cells. J. cells. J. Invest. Dermatol., 130 (2010) 259-
reaction. J. Dermatol. Sci., 84 (2016) 314-321. Biol. Chem., 280 (2005) 21061-21066. 269.
SCIENTIFIC PAPER
length dependence of oxidative DNA chrome c oxidase as the primary photo- J.A., Ultraviolet radiation, aging and the
damage induced by UV and visible light. acceptor upon laser exposure of cultured skin: prevention of damage by topical
Carcinogenesis, 18 (1997) 811-816. cells to visible and near IR-range light. cAMP manipulation. Molecules, 19 (2014)
Dokl. Akad. Nauk / [Rossiiskaia Akad. 6202-6219.
[8] Nakashima, Y., Ohta, S. and Wolf, A.M., Nauk., 342 (1995) 693-695.
Blue light-induced oxidative stress in live
skin. Free Radic. Biol. Med., 108 (2017) [12] Cai, S., Yan, M., Mao, Y., Zhou, Y. and
300-310. Liu, G., Relationship between blue light-
induced apoptosis and mitochondrial
[9] Liebel, F., Kaur, S., Ruvolo, E., Kollias, N. membrane potential and cytochrome C
and Southall, M.D., Irradiation of Skin with in cultured human retinal pigment epi-
Visible Light Induces Reactive Oxygen Spe- thelium cells, Zhonghua. Yan Ke Za Zhi.,
cies and Matrix-Degrading Enzymes. J. In- 42 (2006) 1095-1102.
vest. Dermatol., 132 (2012) 1901-1907. Corresponding Author
[13] D’Orazio, J.A., Jarrett S., Marsh, A., Pierre-Yves Morvan
[10] Masson-Meyers, D.S., Bumah, V.V. and Lagrew, J. and Cleary, L., Melanoma – Codif Technologie Naturelle
Enwemeka, C.S.A., Comparison of four Epidemiology, Genetics and Risk Fac- La Poultière - BP1
methods for determining viability in hu- tors. In: Recent Advances in the Biology, 35610 Roz sur Couesnon
man dermal fibroblasts irradiated with Therapy and Management of Melano- France
blue light. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods, ma, (David, L.). IntechOpen, Cape Town py.morvan@codif.com
79 (2016) 15-22. (2013). G