Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CAMPO GRANDE
2019
2
CAMPO GRANDE
2019
3
FOLHA DE APROVAÇÃO
4
AGRADECIMENTOS
Hoje, após quatro anos de muito aprendizado, tenho muita “gratidão” a todos que
fizeram parte desta serene conquista. O ato de agradecer é sem dúvida um gesto de
humildade, pois nossas conquistas são alcanças e fortalecidas na união de grupos,
pois precisamos um do outro para podermos vencer. A nossa caminhada não é
sozinha!
Desta forma, agradeço:
À Deus e a Nossa Senhora, que com sua Luz me guiam com muita sabedoria para
trilhar o caminho com humildade, responsabilidade e resiliência.
Pai e Mãe como base, esteio e refúgio. Agradeço pelo amor e os ensinamentos
éticos, pois esta base fez de mim a pessoa que me tornei hoje, com a essência dos
seus ensinamentos. Meus queridos irmãos, avó, sobrinha e cunhado; vocês
acreditaram e apoiaram na minha escolha, hoje mais uma etapa acadêmica finaliza,
e esta vitória é dedicada também a vocês!
A minha amada, e eterna namorada Glauciely, pela força transmitida, pela paciência
e pelo Amor demonstrado em todo o caminho que já percorremos juntos, e ainda por
todo sonho e propósito de vida juntos.
Ao meu Orientador Dr Julio Croda pela confiança depositada, incentivo,
oportunidade de trabalhar em seus projetos, e por ter contribuído para meu
crescimento profissional e pessoal.
A minha Co Orientadora Dra Crhistinne Maymone, que incansavelmente contribuiu
significativamente a esta produção. Gratidão por fazer parte da minha história e do
nosso crescimento, pois apredemos juntos e crescemos juntos.
A UFMS, Faculdade de Medicina e ao Programa de Pós Graduação em Doenças
Infecciosas e Parasitárias, uma instituição pública de qualidade que depositou em
mim a confiança em cumprir as exigências acadêmicas e científicas e oportunizou
meu crescimento.
A Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), por
financiar por meio de Bolsa Social a execução deste trabalho.
Ao nosso grupo de Pesquisa, que bravamente tem enfrentado os desafios de
combater, inovar e construir o conhecimento científico em Tuberculose nas prisões
brasileira e divulgar esse conhecimento ao mundo. Em especial agradeço as minhas
amigas Enfermeiras Andrea e Dayse, pois desde 2013 estamos juntos nesta batalha.
A grande equipe do Sistema Prisional, que nos acolheram e fizeram nosso projeto
fazer parte da rotina de trabalho de cada servidor penitenciário. Em especial, alguns
nomes que gostaria de mencionar, Dr Maurício, Dra Maria de Lourdes (Chefia de
Saúde - AGEPEN), Enfª. Renata Terumi, Guiomar, Sarlete, Denise, Vagner,
Enfª.Ludmila, Maria José e Enfª Christiane, vocês nesses últimos quatro anos,
estiveram presentes em minha vida.
5
Aos meus grandes amigos, que vivenciaram os meus passos desde a Graduação
até o Doutorado, sem dúvida faltariam espaço nesta tese para pontuar cada um, mas
sintam-se agradecidos. Menciono a Prof. Dra Dulce Ribas, que me Iniciou à Pesquisa
em 2009 com o Pibic - CNPQ voluntário, dedico a minha conquista de hoje de forma
muito especial, com eterna gratidão aos seus ensinamentos.
Não poderia deixar de mencionar, alguns nomes: Dras. Anamaria, Claudia Volpe,
Sandra Leone, Adriana Negri e toda equipe Hospital Dia, aprendi muito, e sou
eternamente grato, pois vocês fizeram parte da minha história. À Sandra Leone,
gratidão, pelo cuidado, carinho e oportunidade de aprendizagem, possibilitou a
capacitação na aplicação e leitura de Teste Tuberculínico, que sem dúvida fez
diferença nesta tese.
Ao Prof. Dr.Tietê, que nos permitiu profunda reflexão no conhecimento.
A consolidação deste trabalho não seria possível sem a ajuda e contribuição de
inúmeras pessoas, por isso, gostaria de expressar minha eterna gratidão e apreço a
todos que fizeram a diferença para que esse projeto se tornasse realidade.
Muito obrigado a todos.
6
RESUMO
ABSTRACT
LISTA DE ABREVIATURAS
SUMÁRIO
1 INTRODUÇÃO......................................................................................... 11
2 REVISÃO DE LITERATURA................................................................... 13
3 OBJETIVOS............................................................................................. 23
3.1 Geral........................................................................................................ 23
3.2 Específicos............................................................................................. 23
4 MATERIAL E MÉTODOS........................................................................ 24
4.1 Linha de base da pesquisa.................................................................. 24
4.2 Condução metodológica da Etapa 1.................................................... 25
4.3 Condução metodológica da Etapa 2.................................................... 26
4.2 Aspectos éticos...................................................................................... 27
5 RESULTADOS......................................................................................... 28
5.1 Artigo 1.................................................................................................... 29
5.2 Artigo 2.................................................................................................... 40
6 DISCUSSÃO........................................................................................... 62
7 CONCLUSÃO.......................................................................................... 68
REFERÊNCIAS....................................................................................... 69
ANEXO A................................................................................................ 74
ANEXO B................................................................................................ 83
ANEXO C................................................................................................ 92
ANEXO D................................................................................................ 95
APENDICE A.....…………………………………………………………….. 101
APENDICE B.....…………………………………………………………….. 103
11
1. INTRODUÇÃO
doença pode se tornar um relevante problema de saúde pública, uma vez que já há evidências
de circulação das cepas M.tuberculosis em casos como esses (SACHI et al., 2015; WARREN
et al., 2018).
Frente a esta situação, justifica-se esta tese pela necessidade de identificar estratégias
efetivas para o controle da TB que possam contribuir para implementação de políticas
públicas já vigentes, como a Estratégia End TB da OMS e o Plano Nacional de combate à TB.
13
2 REVISÃO DE LITERATURA
2.1.1 Epidemiologia
2.1.2 Diagnóstico
A TB, em relação a sua forma clínica, pode ser pulmonar ou extrapulmonar, a depender
da localização do sítio de infecção, dentro ou não dos pulmões. Desta forma, os marcadores
clínicos de sinais e sintomas podem ser variados. Na TB pulmonar, os sinais e sintomas mais
comuns incluem: tosse por mais de três semanas, expectoração, febre vespertina, sudorese
noturna, emagrecimento, astenia, hemoptise, dor nas costas e no peito (BRASIL, 2017).
Embora os sintomas sejam conhecidos, identificar precocemente os sintomáticos
respiratórios (SR) e aqueles com maior potencial de adoecimento por TB é ainda um grande
desafio (CASTRO et al., 2011), pois raramente procuram uma unidade de saúde no início dos
sintomas, sendo esses sintomas atribuídos a uma gripe mal curada, a uma bronquite tabágica
ou a outra situação clínica qualquer (CONDE et al., 2009).
15
2.1.3 Tratamento
de 32,6% (IC 95%: 27,5% a 38,2%; valor de p para heterogeneidade = 0,001). As análises
dos subgrupos por continente mostraram variações nas taxas de co-infecções, na África, 14%
(IC: 8% a 24%); América do Norte / Sul, 37% (IC: 31% a 44%); Ásia, 35% (IC: 12% a 68%); e
Europa, 25% (IC: 12% a 45%). Os achados indicaram o rastreamento da TB nessa população
como essencial para o tratamento de ambas as doenças.
Em 2014, um total de 8,4% de todos os casos de TB notificados ocorreu entre reclusos,
que representam < 0,3% da população, correspondendo a um aumento de 35,4% do
percentual de casos de TB ocorridos entre reclusos em 5 ano (2009 - 2014). As taxas de
notificação de casos de TB ente os presos foram 31,3 vezes maiores do que as da população
geral. O estudo revelou que as mulheres presas correm maior risco de contrair tuberculose.
As taxas de encarceramento entre as mulheres aumentaram mais rapidamente, e as taxas
de notificação de TB e as taxas de coinfceção por HIV foram maiores do que as taxas
correspondentes entre os homens. Uma explicação potencial é a maior taxa de TB associada
ao HIV entre mulheres presas do que entre homens (24,1% vs. 15,2%) (BOURDILLON et al.,
2017).
Em estudos referentes à TB ativa nas prisões brasileiras, evidenciou-se uma taxa
elevada nas diferentes regiões do país. Um resultado destacado é o da variação da taxa
infecção latente de TB (ILTB) nas prisões dos estados brasileiros, com valores entre 11,7% a
73,0%, mostrando que a infecção nos encarcerados do sexo masculino é maior do que a
encontrada nas mulheres encarceradas (LEMOS et al., 2009; NOGUEIRA et al., 2012;
CARBONE et al., 2015; COSTA-JUNIOR et al., 2016).
Kuhleis et al., (2012) e Valença et al., (2015) destacam que a alta taxa de TB ativa
encontrada na região Sul do país está relacionada à infecções recentes, pois observaram que
a TB foi causada, principalmente, por estirpes transmitidas nos últimos anos. Por estes
resultados recomendam que a prioridade seja dada à avaliação dos presos com mais tempo
de encarceramento, àqueles que são HIV-positivos, àqueles com sintomas e aos com história
prévia de TB.
Na região Nordeste, altas taxas de doença ativa e ILTB e foram encontradas, chegando
a 2500 casos por 100 mil e de 65% de ILTB (LEMOS et al., 2009). Na região Sudeste, nas
prisões do Espirito Santo, as taxas menores de prevalência de TB ativa foram menores que
aquelas encontradas nas demais regiões supracitadas, (830 casos/100 mil). O estudo discute
a possibilidade desta baixa prevalência estar relacionada com a subnotificação no sistema
(MOREIRA et al., 2010).
20
Já, dados de TB na região Centro Oeste, mostram que, em prisões de Goiás, a taxa
de incidência foi muito superior do que a taxa de TB no restante do estado (de 1800 casos
por 100 mil versus 14/100 mil hab.) (COSTA-JUNIOR et al., 2016; BRASIL, 2018). Nas
prisões de Mato Grosso do Sul, embora a prevalência global de ILTB em internos
apresentarem menores taxas (25,7%) menores que em outras prisões do país; a prevalência
de TB ativa foi alta (970 casos por 100 mil), o que indica necessidade de abordar a
transmissão da TB dentro das prisões (CARBONE et al., 2015).
Uma preocupação crescente, dentro do cenário das prisões, é a TB com resistência ao
tratamento. Estudos sobre as prisões apresentaram taxas de resistência elevadas aos
medicamentos antituberculose, o que gera preocupações neste cenário
(BIADGLEGNE;ROLDLOFF;SACK, 2015; RUDDY et al., 2005). Em Mato Grosso do Sul,
estudo realizado em prisões por Cunha et al., (2018) mostrou que as taxas de resistência a
múltiplas drogas (MDR) primárias e adquiridas foram (0,3% e 1,3%, respectivamente)
estiveram abaixo das encontradas na população geral do estado (0,6% e 6,3%,
respectivamente) (MARQUES et al., 2017). Desta forma, a garantia do tratamento completo,
sem interrupção com taxa de cura pelo menos 85% vai refletir nas menores taxa de
resistência.
3 OBJETIVOS
3.1 Geral
3.2 Específicos
a) Analisar o impacto do rastreamento anual com baciloscopia e cultura no que diz respeito a
incidência da doença em 12 prisões de Mato Grosso do Sul;
b) Quantificar o risco de TB para privados de liberdade de acordo com a trajetória no sistema
prisional do estado de Mato Grosso do Sul e o retorno na comunidade.
c) Avaliar através da modelagem matemática cinco estratégias para controle da TB nas
prisões e possíveis impactos na redução da incidência da doença nas prisões e na
comunidade.
24
4 MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS
A tese está inserida em um amplo projeto detalhado no item 4.1 e dividido por etapas
de construções (Etapa 1 e Etapa 2) que exigiram métodos específicos. As etapas contemplam
dois artigos os quais apresentam seus percursos metodológicos.
5 RESULTADOS
Dayse Sanchez Guimarães Paião1†, Everton Ferreira Lemos2†, Andrea da Silva Santos
Carbone1, Renata Viebrantz Enne Sgarbi1, Alexandre Laranjeira Junior1, Fellipe Matos da
Silva1, Letícia Marques Brandão1, Luciana Squarizi dos Santos1, Vaneli Silva Martins1,
Simone Simionatto3, Ana Rita Coimbra Motta-Castro4,5, Maurício Antônio Pompílio2, Juliana
Urrego6, Albert Icksang Ko6,7, Jason Randolph Andrews8 and Julio Croda1,5*
†Equal contributors
1Faculty of Health Sciences, Federal University of Grande Dourados, Dourados, Brazil.
2School of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil.
3Faculty of Ambiental and Biological Sciences,
Grande, Brazil.
5Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Campo Grande, Brazil.
6Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New
Abstract
Background: Globally, prison inmates are a high-risk population for tuberculosis (TB), but the specific drivers of
disease and impact of mass screening interventions are poorly understood.
Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study to characterize the incidence and risk factors for tuberculosis
infection and disease in 12 Brazilian prisons, and to investigate the effect of mass screening on subsequent disease
risk. After recruiting a stratified random sample of inmates, we administered a questionnaire to ascertain symptoms and
potential risk factors for tuberculosis; performed tuberculin skin testing (TST); collected sera for HIV testing; and
obtained two sputum samples for smear microscopy and culture, from participants reporting a cough of any duration.
We repeated the questionnaire and all tests for inmates who remained incarcerated after 1 year. TST conversion was
defined as TST ≥10 mm and an induration increase of at least 6 mm in an individual with a baseline TST <10 mm.
Cox proportional hazard models were performed to identify risk factors associated with active TB. To evaluate the
impact of screening on subsequent risk of disease, we compared TB notifications over one year among individuals
randomized to screening for active TB with those not randomized to screening.
Results: Among 3,771 inmates recruited, 3,380 (89.6 %) were enrolled in the study, and 1,422 remained incarcerated
after one year. Among 1,350 inmates (94.9 %) with paired TSTs at baseline and one-year follow-up, 25. 7 % (272/1060)
converted to positive. Among those incarcerated for the year, 10 (0.7 %) had TB at baseline and 25 (1.8 %) were
diagnosed with TB over the subsequent year. Cases identified through active screening were less likely to be
smearpositive than passively detected cases (10.0 % vs 50.9 %; p < 0.01), suggesting early case detection.
However, there was no reduction in subsequent disease among individuals actively screened versus those not screened
(1.3 % vs 1.7 %; p = 0.88). Drug use during the year (AHR 3.22; 95 % CI 1.05–9.89) and knows somebody with TB were
(AHR 2.86; 95 % CI 1.01–8.10) associated with active TB during one year of follow up
Conclusions: Mass screening in twelve Brazilian prisons did not reduce risk of subsequent disease in twelve
Brazilian prisons, likely due to an extremely high force of infection. New approaches are needed to control TB in this
high-transmission setting.
Keywords: Tuberculosis, LTBI, Mass screening, Prisons, Case finding, Brazil, Cohort
* Correspondence: juliocroda@gmail.com
†
Equal contributors
1
Faculty of Health Sciences, Federal University of Grande Dourados,
Dourados, Brazil
5
Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Campo Grande, Brazil
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2016 The Author(s). Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original
author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
2
One sputum sample was collected on the spot and a second hazards ratios (AHR) for active TB. Variables were in-
sputum sample was collected the following morning. Serum cluded in the model if they reached a significance level of p
samples of participants were initially screened with a < 0.20 by log-rank test, which was then trimmed using
commercial enzyme linked immuno- sorbent assay (ELISA) stepwise backward selection. Statistical significance was
for detection of antibodies against HIV-1 and HIV-2 (Murex determined at a p value of <0.05.
HIV-1.2.0, DiaSorin, Italy). All positive and indeterminate
specimens were confirmed by Western blot assay Ethical issues
(Novopath HIV-I, Immunoblot, BioRad) [8]. TST positivity All eligible participants provided written informed consent
was defined as an induration of ≥10 mm (≥5 mm for HIV- prior to study participation. The study was approved by the
infected individuals), and TST conversion was defined as Research Ethics Committee at the Federal University of
TST ≥10 mm and an in- duration increase of at least 6 mm Grande Dourados (Number 793,740). All LTBI in HIV-
in an individual with a baseline TST <10 mm [10]. In HIV- positive individuals and active TB cases identified during the
positive individuals, TST conversion was defined as an screening underwent medical consultation after the test
induration increase of at least 6 mm in an individual with a results and were referred for free tuberculosis treat- ment or
baseline TST preventive therapy.
<5 mm. Brazilian Ministry of Health (MoH) recommends
IPT only for HIV-infected inmates with positive TST. Results
After one year, we returned and administered a second From 7,221 inmates in the 12 prisons, we enrolled 3,380
questionnaire and TST, and again performed smear mi- inmates for the study. The results of initial screening were
croscopy and culture for all participants reporting cough. previously reported [8]. Among these, 1,422 remained
To calculate the yield of smear, individuals with positive incarcerated in the same prison after 1 year (Fig. 1); this
sputum smear and/or culture in the first and second screening subset comprises the prospective cohort in whom TST
were included in the active screening group. Additionally, conversions and TB incidence were assessed. The majority
we reviewed prison medical records and the National of study participants were men (87 %) and mean age was 33
Notifiable Disease database (Sistema de Informação de years old (SD: ±10 years, range: 18–80 years). Previous
Agravos de Notificação National, SINAN) to identify TB incarceration was reported among 61 % of participants, and
cases occurring between the study initi- ation and 45 % had less than 4 years of school- ing. We identified 18
conclusion. TB cases identified during these period were (1.3 %) inmates with positive HIV serology. At baseline, 66
included in the passive screening group. All questionnaires % reported at least 1 TB symp- tom as defined by the WHO
were entered twice into the Research Electronic Data and 23 % had productive cough (Table 1). Among 1,422
Capture database (REDCap, secure online database). SAS inmates followed for one year, baseline latent and active TB
version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) was used to prevalence were 21 % (95 % CI: 19–24 %) and 0.7 % (95
analyze bivariable and multivariable models. % CI: 0.3–1.3 %), re-
spectively (Fig. 1).
Analytic approach A second TST was performed in 1,379 (97 %) inmates who
Tuberculosis cases were considered “actively detected” if remained incarcerated at one year. Among 1,089 participants
they were detected by diagnostics performed during mass with a negative TST at baseline, 1060 had a TST performed
screening, conducted at baseline and after one year. Cases at one year, and 272 (25.7 %, 95 % CI 22.7–28.9 %)
were considered “passively detected” if they were detected converted. TST conversion was higher in male compared to
by routine presentation for medical care between the two female prisoners (28 % versus 10 %; p < 0.01), while TB
mass screening rounds; there was no overlap between the incidence was non-significantly higher (1.39 % versus 0.53
two forms of diagnosis. The “active screening” group was %; p = 0.68) (Table 2). No difference in TST conversion
the group of inmates enrolled in the study who were actively rates was observed when comparing HIV-uninfected and
screened at baseline and one year follow up. Cumulative HIV-infected prisoners (26 % versus 25 %, p = 0.95).
incidence of active TB was calculated using all incident During the first year of follow-up, active TB was diag- nosed
cases notified by SINAN between the two screening periods in 18 participants in the active screening group. All tested
divided by all the prisoners who remained one year in the negative for HIV at baseline and after 1 year. All but 1 case
same prison in the two groups. We used survival curves and occurred among male inmates, and 9 (36 %) occurred in
log-rank test to compare the cumulative incidences of active just one prison, the maximum-security prison in Campo
tu- berculosis among the group who underwent annual Grande. Seven cases were diagnosed at the time of the
screening with the group of individuals who did not undergo second survey (Table 2).
annual screening. Cox proportional hazards models were While cases identified through active screening were much
used to estimate crude (CHR) and adjusted less likely to be smear positive than those identified
4
by passive case detection (10.0 % vs 50.9 %; p < 0.01), there 6-month duration of disease before diagnosis, death, or re-
was no statistical difference in the subsequent cumulative lease; it is during this window that transmission occurs.
incidence of the group that was actively screened versus While this period may be longer due to underestimation of
those not screened (1.3 % vs 1.7 %; log-rank p value = 0.88) prevalence, it nevertheless reflects a narrow window for
(Fig. 2). Drug susceptibility testing are done by con- diagnosis, in comparison with community estimates of in-
ventional broth-based culture methods using the MGIT 960 fectious duration that are often twice as long [13].
system and did not identify any case of multidrug- resistant The effective contact rate (annual risk of infection di- vided
tuberculosis. Drug use during the year (AHR 3.22; 95 % CI by prevalence) during this period is extremely high
1.05–9.89) and knows somebody with TB were (AHR 2.86; (>36/year), reflecting high rates of transmission and could
95 % CI 1.01–8.10) associated with active TB during one year represents the confluence of several factors: 1) overcrowding;
of follow up (Table 1). 2) poorly ventilated environments; 3) limited TB diagnostic
infrastructure; and 4) an inmate population with low prevalence
Discussion of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) upon initial
The extraordinarily high incidence of TB infection (25.7 %) incarceration, who are at higher risk for infec- tion upon
and disease (1,275 per 100,000 inmates) indicate a critical need exposure [7, 8, 14–16].
to address TB transmission inside prisons. By compar- ing TB WHO and the Brazilian Ministry of Health recom- mend
prevalence with incidence, we estimate an average screening for TB in prions at entry and annually;
5
Table 1 Risk factors associated with incident cases of active tuberculosis (TB) among inmates from 12 Brazilian prisons during one
year of follow-up (N = 1,422)
Variables N (%) Active TB
Crude hazard ratio p-value Adjusted hazard ratio p-value
Age (mean ± SD) 32.6 ± 9.7 0.99 (0.95–1.04)a 0.821
Sex (Male) 1235 (86.8) 2.63 (0.35–19.73) 0.348
Race
White 463 (33.9) 1.0
Mixed 685 (50.2) 0.94 (0.30–2.98) 0.924
Black 170 (12.5) 3.30 (1.01–10.83) 0.048b
Indigenous 19 (1.4) -
Asian 28 (2.1) -
Reported any WHO TB symptom at baseline 934 (65.7) 2.63 (0.76–9.09) 0.126b
Reported productive cough at baseline 325 (22.9) 2.25 (0.87–5.80) 0.094b
Less than 4 year of schooling 772 (55.5) 1.63 (0.61–4.36) 0.323
Diabetes Mellitus 0 (0.0) - -
Current Smoker 730 (51.8) 2.47 (0.88–6.94) 0.085b
HIV positive 18 (1.3) - -
Drug use over the last year 739 (52.0) 3.91 (1.29–11.87) 0.016b 3.22 (1.05–9.89) 0.042
Previous incarceration 860 (60.8) 1.03 (0.40–2.66) 0.951
TST positive 290 (21.0) 1.74 (0.60–5.00) 0.306
Previous TB 92 (6.6) 3.01 (0.90–10.70) 0.074b
Knows someone with TB 607 (43.5) 3.45 (1.24–9.73) 0.018b 2.86 (1.01–8.10) 0.049
a
Per 1-year increase
b
Variables initially included in the multivariate model, which was trimmed through backward selection
however, in practice, this was not being performed in any smear positivity have been demonstrated in community
of the study prisons. In this study, mass screening appeared settings comparing active and passive case detection [17].
to identify patients early in the course of disease, as reflected However, subsequent TB incidence among screened indi-
by lower smear positivity rates (10.0 % vs viduals was not significantly reduced. This may be a result
50.9 % by passive diagnosis); similar findings concerning of the extremely high force of infection driving new cases.
Table 2 Tuberculin skin test (TST) conversions and tuberculosis (TB) incidence in 8 male and 4 female Brazilian prisons (N = 1,422)
Variables Prisons
Male Female Total
Capacity 2,469 451 2,920
Inmate population 6,552 669 7,221
Individuals enrolled at baseline 2,861 519 3,380
Individuals followed for 1 year 1,235 187 1,422
TST-negative subjects 905 155 1,060
TST converted subjects 256 16 272
TST conversion rate, %a 28 (25–32) 10 (6–17) 26 (23–29)
Incident cases reported between screenings 17 1 18
TB cases at 1st screening 10 0 10
TB cases at 2 nd screening 7 0 7
TB incidence, %a,b 1.39 (0.81–2.22) 0.53 (0.01–2.98) 1.27 (0.76–2.02)
Abbreviations: TB tuberculosis; TST tuberculin skin test
a
Percentage and 95 % confidence interval
b
Cases identified between screenings or at second screening as a proportion of individuals followed for 1 year
6
Moreover, the majority (72 %) of TB diagnoses were made countries. Our finding of low LTBI prevalence at time of
passively between the two active screening points. En- prison admission and a high rate of TST conversion after one
hanced screening for active TB, while valuable, may be in- year suggests that annual TST screening and treat- ment of
sufficient to effectively control TB in prisons [8]. Most LTBI could potentially be an effective interven- tion in this
likely, multiple interventions will be necessary to reduce TB setting [23].
transmission in prisons in resource-poor countries. Emphasis Although two previous cross-sectional studies have shown
on direct measures to reduce transmission, such as reducing that drug use was associated with active TB in prisoners
crowding and improving ventilation [7], or re- ducing populations [24, 25], this is the first cohort study designed
disease risk among recently infected inmates, may be needed to identify individual risk factors associ- ated with active TB
to control TB under these conditions. inside the prisons. Drug use over the last year (AHR 3.22; 95
There are two broad classes of proven interventions for % CI 1.05–9.89) was associated with active TB and drug
averting TB transmission: expedited diagnosis with abuse program need to imple- ment to reduce the incidence
treatment of infectious cases, and preventive therapy for of active TB in prisons.
LTBI. In Alaska (U.S.), for example, vigorous programs Urrego et al. documented overcrowding and inad- equate
for early diagnosis, treatment and isoniazid preventive ventilation in 3 prisons included in this study [7]. In a recent
therapy (IPT) had rapid and dramatic effects on TB inci- study in prisons in Chile, overcrowding was identified as a
dence and transmission [18, 19]. Currently, the WHO key determinant of LTBI among contacts of active TB cases
provides a conditional recommendation for LTBI screen- [14]. In our study, female prisons were at 148 % (669/451)
ing and provision of isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) in capacity, while male prisons were at 265 % (6,552/2,469)
prisons in high and upper middle-income countries [20], capacity (Table 2). The higher TST conversion rates and
but the Brazilian MoH does not recommend treat- ing active TB incidence in male prisons compared with female
inmates with a positive TST. In contrast, treatment is prisoners may be in part due to greater overcrowding in the
recommended and has been shown to be effective in former.
controlling the disease in other high-risk populations, Our findings are subject to several limitations. We used the
such as indigenous groups [21]. Screening for TB at the TST conversion to assess tuberculosis infec- tions, which has
entry and annually, with provision of IPT for infected in- imperfect sensitivity and specificity, but is the primary
dividuals, has been effective at reducing TB incidence in modality of latent tuberculosis infection testing in Brazil. To
the United States [22], but there are few published data on test for active tuberculosis, we per- formed smear and culture
the use of IPT in penal institutions in resource-poor on two sputum specimens.
7
Chest radiography is not available in the prisons, which human immunodeficiency virus; IPT: isoniazid preventive therapy; LTBI: latent
could enhance screening sensitivity and could potentially tuberculosis infection; MGIT: Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube;
PPD: purified protein derivative; REDCap: Research Electronic Data Capture
decrease TB transmission and incidence. While recom- database; SD: standard deviation; SINAN: Sistema de Informação de Agravos de
mended by Brazilian guidelines, screening for TB upon entry Notificação National; TB: tuberculosis; TST: tuberculin skin test;
into prisons is not routinely performed. TB inci- dence in the WHO: World Health Organization
3. Kuhleis D, Ribeiro AW, Costa ER, Cafrune PI, Schmid KB, Costa LL, Ribeiro MO, Zaha A, Rossetti ML. Tuberculosis in a southern Brazilian prison. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107(7):909–
15.
4. Sanchez A, Massari V, Gerhardt G, Espinola AB, Siriwardana M, Camacho LA, Larouze B. X ray screening at entry and systematic screening for the control of tuberculosis in a highly endemic
prison. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:983.
5. Adane K, Spigt M, Ferede S, Asmelash T, Abebe M, Dinant GJ. Half of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Cases Were Left Undiagnosed in Prisons of the Tigray Region of Ethiopia: Implications for
Tuberculosis Control. PloS One. 2016;11(2):e0149453.
6. Telisinghe L, Fielding KL, Malden JL, Hanifa Y, Churchyard GJ, Grant AD, Charalambous S. High tuberculosis prevalence in a South African prison: the need for routine tuberculosis screening.
PloS One. 2014;9(1):e87262.
7. Urrego J, Ko AI, da Silva Santos Carbone A, Paiao DS, Sgarbi RV, Yeckel CW, Andrews JR, Croda J. The Impact of Ventilation and Early Diagnosis on Tuberculosis Transmission in Brazilian
Prisons. Am J Trop Med Hyg.
2015;93(4):739–46.
8. Carbone Ada S, Paiao DS, Sgarbi RV, Lemos EF, Cazanti RF, Ota MM, Junior AL, Bampi JV, Elias VP, Simionatto S, et al. Active and latent tuberculosis in Brazilian correctional facilities: a cross-
sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:24.
9. Departamento Penitenciário Nacional MdJ, Brasil. Levantamento Nacional de Informações PenitenciáriasINFOPEN - JUNHO 2014. In: 2014. http://www. justica.gov.br/noticias/mj-
divulgara-novo-relatorio-do-infopen-nestaterca- feira/relatorio-depen-versao-web.pdf. Accessed 27 Sep 2016.
10. Tuberculosis Control in Prisons. World Health Organization. 2000. http:// apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/66823/1/WHO_CDS_TB_2000.281.pdf. Acessed 27 Sep 2016.
11. Aerts A, Habouzit M, Mschiladze L, Malakmadze N, Sadradze N, Menteshashvili O, Portaels F, Sudre P. Pulmonary tuberculosis in prisons of the ex-USSR state Georgia: results of a nation-
wide prevalence survey among sentenced inmates. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000;4(12):1104–10.
12. Sanchez A, Gerhardt G, Natal S, Capone D, Espinola A, Costa W, Pires J, Barreto A, Biondi E, Larouze B. Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis and comparative evaluation of screening
strategies in a Brazilian prison. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9(6):633–9.
13. Wood R, Middelkoop K, Myer L, Grant AD, Whitelaw A, Lawn SD, Kaplan G, Huebner R, McIntyre J, Bekker LG. Undiagnosed tuberculosis in a community with high HIV prevalence:
implications for tuberculosis control. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(1):87–93.
14. Aguilera XP, Gonzalez C, Najera-De Ferrari M, Hirmas M, Delgado I, Olea A, Lezaeta L, Montana A, Gonzalez P, Hormazabal JC, et al. Tuberculosis in prisoners and their contacts in Chile:
estimating incidence and latent infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20(1):63–70.
15. Dara M, Acosta CD, Melchers NV, Al-Darraji HA, Chorgoliani D, Reyes H, Centis R, Sotgiu G, D'Ambrosio L, Chadha SS, et al. Tuberculosis control in prisons: current situation and research
gaps. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;32:111–7.
16. Johnstone-Robertson S, Lawn SD, Welte A, Bekker LG, Wood R. Tuberculosis in a South African prison - a transmission modelling analysis. S Afr Med J. 2011;101(11):809–13.
17. Eang MT, Satha P, Yadav RP, Morishita F, Nishikiori N, van-Maaren P, Weezenbeek CL. Early detection of tuberculosis through community-based active case finding in Cambodia. BMC Public
Health. 2012;12:469.
18. Comstock GW, Baum C, Snider Jr DE. Isoniazid prophylaxis among Alaskan Eskimos: a final report of the bethel isoniazid studies. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979;119(5):827–30.
19. Comstock GW, Philip RN. Decline of the tuberculosis epidemic in Alaska. Public Health Rep. 1961;76:19–24.
20. Getahun H, Matteelli A, Raviglione M. Guidelines on the management of latent tuberculosis infection. In. Edited by Organization WH. 2015. http://apps.
who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/136471/1/9789241548908_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1. Accessed 27 Sept 2016.
21. Yuhara LS, Sacchi FP, Croda J. Impact of latent infection treatment in indigenous populations. PloS One. 2013;8(7):e71201.
22. MacIntyre CR, Kendig N, Kummer L, Birago S, Graham NM. Impact of tuberculosis control measures and crowding on the incidence of tuberculous infection in Maryland prisons. Clin Infect
Dis. 1997;24(6):1060–7.
23. Chan PC, Yang CH, Chang LY, Wang KF, Lu BY, Lu CY, Shao PL, Hsueh PR, Fang CT, Huang LM. Latent tuberculosis infection treatment for prison inmates: a randomised controlled trial. Int J
Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(5):633–8.
24. Alavi SM, Bakhtiarinia P, Eghtesad M, Albaji A, Salmanzadeh S. A
comparative study on the prevalence and risk factors of tuberculosis among the prisoners in khuzestan, South-west iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7(12):e18872.
25. Adesokan HK, Cadmus EO, Adeyemi WB, Lawal O, Ogunlade CO, Osman E, Olaleye OD, Cadmus S. Prevalence of previously undetected tuberculosis and underlying risk factors for
transmission in a prison setting in Ibadan, south-western Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2014;43 Suppl 1:45–50.
26. Croda MG, Trajber Z, Lima Rda C, Croda J. Tuberculosis control in a highly endemic indigenous community in Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012;106(4):223–9.
40
Artigo 2 - Evaluating strategies for control of tuberculosis in prisons and prevention of spillover
into communities: An observational and modeling study from Brazil
Authors:
Tarub S. Mabud1, Maria de Lourdes Delgado Alves2, Albert I. Ko3, Sanjay Basu1, Katharine S. Walter1,Ted
Cohen3, Barun Mathema4, Caroline Colijn5, Everton Lemos6, Julio Croda6, Jason R. Andrews1
Affiliations:
1Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA,
94305, USA
2Agência Estadual de Administração do Sistema Penitenciário, Bairro Coronel Antonino, Campo Grande,
MS 79011-190, Brazil
3Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street,
New Haven, CT 06510, USA
4Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
West 168th Street, Room 707, New York, New York 10032, USA
5Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
6School of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Av. Costa e Silva, Campo Grande, MS
79070-900, Brazil
PLOS Medicine
1549-1676 PLOS MEDICINE (ONLINE) MEDICINA II A1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
1 Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America, 2
Agência Estadual de Administração do Sistema Penitenciário, Campo Grande, Brazil,
3 Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United
States of America, 4 Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York,
New York, United States of America, 5 Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United
Kingdom, 6 Department of Mathematics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada, 7 School of Medicine, Federal
University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brazil, 8 Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Campo Grande, Brazil
confidential data. Prison record data are available from the Agência Estadual de Administração do Sistema Penitenciário (AGEPEN:
www.agepen.ms. gov.br) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
OPEN ACCESS
Abstract
Background
It has been hypothesized that prisons
serve as amplifiers of general
tuberculosis (TB) epi- demics, but
there is a paucity of data on this
phenomenon and the potential
population-level effects of prison-
focused interventions. This study (1)
quantifies the TB risk for prisoners as
they traverse incarceration and
release, (2) mathematically models the
impact of prison- based interventions
on TB burden in the general population,
and (3) generalizes this model to a wide
range of epidemiological contexts.
Funding: This work was supported by the National reduce TB incidence in prisons by 47.4% (95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI], 44.4%– 52.5%)
Institutes of Health (https://www.nih.gov/) (grant and in the general population by 19.4% (95% BCI 17.9%–24.2%). A generalized model
#R01 AI30058 [JRA]; #DP2 MD010478 [JRA, SB];
#U54 MD010724 [SB]; #R25 TW009338 [AIK];
demonstrates that prison-based interventions would have maximum effectiveness in reducing
#D43 TW010540 [AIK]), the Engineering and community incidence in populations with a high concentration of TB in prisons and greater degrees of
Physical Sciences Research Council (https://epsrc. mixing between ex-prisoners and community members. Study limitations include our focus on a
ukri.org/) (grant #EP/K026003/1 [CC]; #EP/
single Brazilian state and our retrospective use of administrative databases.
N014529/1 [CC]), the Stanford Medical Scholars
Program (http://med.stanford.edu/medscholars. html)
(TSM), and the Infectious Disease Society of America
Medical Scholars Program (http://www.
idsociety.org/Medical_Scholars_Program/) (TSM). The Conclusions
funders had no role in study design, data collection
Our findings suggest that the prison environment, more so than the prison population itself, drives TB
and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of
the manuscript. incidence, and targeted interventions within prisons could have a substantial effect on the broader
Competing interests: I have read the journal’s
TB epidemic.
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Study setting
Brazil has the third-largest incarcerated population in the world [13], and a
rapidly growing proportion of TB cases occur in the correctional system
[5,14–16]. With a population of 2.6 million, the state of Mato Grosso do Sul
lies in central-west Brazil, adjoining Paraguay and Bolivia. The state has the
highest incarceration rate in Brazil (475 prisoners per 100,000 indi- viduals),
driven primarily by drug trafficking across country borders [17].
DATA COLLECTION
We determined the analysis plan prior to the capture of any data and
followed this plan with- out major adjustments. To calculate the annual
incidence of active TB among prisoners and ex-prisoners in Mato Grosso
do Sul, we used two electronic databases: Sistema de Informação de
Agravos de Notificação (SINAN, 2006–2015), the Brazilian Ministry of
Health’s mandatory reporting system for TB; and Sistema Integrado de
Gestão Operacional (SIGO, 2005–2014), the prison record system for Mato
Grosso do Sul. We limited our analysis to the period between January 1,
2007, and December 31, 2013, for which complete data were obtained from
both databases.
SINAN is populated with mandatory reporting forms that are filled out
by healthcare pro- viders on the day a TB diagnosis is determined.
Submitted data comprise a wide range of demographic and clinical
information including name, date of birth, date of death, date of TB
diagnosis, and mother’s name. We had access to SINAN data only for the
state of Mato Grosso do Sul.
SIGO contains the prison records of all individuals incarcerated in Mato
Grosso do Sul. We received permission from the state prison administration
agency to access SIGO within their prison computer network. In general,
information can only be accessed for one prisoner at a time in SIGO, and
only if the prisoner’s name or prison ID number are known; exportation of
the entire database was not feasible given the high sensitivity of the data and
the need to rigor- ously maintain confidentiality. We therefore obtained an
autogenerated report from the SIGO platform, available to certain
administrators, which described comprehensive prisoner move- ment within
the state’s prisons and contained prisoner name, a unique identifier, and all
dates of entry into, transfer between, and release from prison, along with
corresponding prison names.
47
DATABASE LINKAGE
Fig 1. Flow diagram of database linkage and selection of individuals for survival analyses. MS, Mato Grosso do Sul; SIGO,
Sistema Integrado de Gestão Operacional; SINAN, Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação; TB, tuberculosis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002737.g001
The matching process produced 1,258 fuzzy matches between the two
databases. Two investigators independently queried each fuzzy match
48
within the official SIGO database, which allowed for manual comparison
of date of birth, mother’s name, city of birth, and father’s name between
SINAN and SIGO. From the pool of fuzzy matches, we verified 615 cor-
rectly matched individuals who were diagnosed with active TB either
during or after a period of incarceration.
HAZARD ESTIMATION
Fig 2. Incidence of TB among (A) Mato Grosso do Sul prisoners and (B) ex-prisoners based on length of incarceration and length of time following
incarceration, respectively, with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals in blue shading. Histograms of individuals included in each survival analysis are overlaid. TB,
tuberculosis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002737.g002
MODEL
Fig 3. Compartmental model of TB transmission, describing the progression of disease from susceptible (S) to early latent infection (E), late latent infection (L),
infectious (I), and recovery (R) among prisoners (subscript p, pink boxes), ex-prisoners (subscript e, purple boxes), and other community members (subscript c,
blue boxes). Solid arrows represent the dynamics of TB transmission, whereas dotted arrows represent the dynamics of incarceration and release from prison.
The prison environment is shaded blue to distinguish it from the external environment, which comprises ex-prisoners and other community members. TB,
tuberculosis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002737.g003
Table 1. Parameters used to describe TB natural history and epidemiology in a Brazilian state.
Parenthetical values are the ranges used in sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. All rates are annual.
Abbreviations: SIGO, Sistema Integrado de Gestão Operacional; TB, tuberculosis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002737.t001
INTERVENTION STRATEGIES
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
ETHICS STATEMENT
This study was approved by the following bodies: (1) the Stanford
University Institutional Review Board (IRB-34301), (2) the Federal
University of Grande Dourados (Opinion Number 877294), and (3)
Agencia Estadual de Administracao do Sistema Penitenciario (signed
docu- ment from the director of the state prison agency).
RESULTS
the state did not have a significantly higher AHR for active TB upon
release than all other prisons (AHR 1.65, 95% BCI 0.93–2.91, p = 0.09).
However, the hazard for active TB upon release from female prisons was
significantly lower than for male prisons (AHR 0.49, 95% BCI 0.29–0.84,
p = 0.009). The proportional hazards assumption was tested by evaluating
the relationship between Schoenfeld residuals and time for each individual
covariate, which was nonsignificant (p = 0.86 for global test).
Fig 4. Proportionate decrease in TB incidence over 10 years according to various prison-based interventions. Box and whisker plots describe uncertainty in
intervention effectiveness produced by Latin Hypercube Sampling analysis; boxes characterize 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile values; whiskers characterize a range
of values up to 1.5 times the IQR; and dots represent outliers beyond this range. IPT, isoniazid preventive therapy; IQR, interquartile range; TB, tuberculosis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002737.g004
SENSITIVITY ANALYSES
Fig 5. Heatmap of percent decrease in community TB incidence brought about by active diagnosis intervention across ranges of relative TB incidence (prisoner/
community) and proportion of population incarcerated. Assumptions include (A) assortative mixing (3-fold relative rate of contact) for community members and
ex-prisoners and (B) proportionate mixing between community members and ex-prisoners. TB, tuberculosis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002737.g005
DISCUSSION
that occur among prisoners, because of the high turnover of this population
and dynamics of transmission in pri- sons and between prisons and
communities. These findings underscore the importance of identifying and
characterizing high-risk subpopulations for targeting TB control efforts.
A key question is whether the prison environment is the primary
driver of TB risk or whether high TB rates in prisons are primarily a
consequence of a population with preexisting high-risk attributes (e.g.,
HIV, substance abuse). The marked increase in TB risk that occurs upon
incarceration, along with the decline in incidence following release,
implicates the prison environment in driving disease in the population,
whether it is due to transmission or acquired host factors (e.g., malnutrition,
vitamin D deficiency) in the prison [31]. The observed peak of active TB
incidence at 5 years and subsequent decline is consistent with an extremely
high annual risk of infection occurring among a highly susceptible
population, such that the major- ity of inmates would be exposed within 3–
4 years. A recent study conducted in 12 prisons in Mato Grosso do Sul
demonstrated that only 9% of inmates had latent TB at the time of incar-
ceration, but an estimated 80% would be infected after 5 years [32]. The
decline in active TB hazard after 5–6 years of incarceration could be
explained by depletion of susceptible individu- als—the majority of
individuals have been infected and have either progressed to disease or
established latency. However, we note that we had limited data from
prisoners incarcerated over 5 years and caution against overinterpretation of
this finding.
We find an increased rate of TB notifications among ex-prisoners,
which declined steadily in the years following release but remained higher
than that of the general population for sev- eral years. Given low
transmission rates in the community, we believe this finding is driven
primarily by infections acquired within prisons, which manifest in the
years following release. Variability in disease progression and diagnosis
results in a long declining tail of notifications following exit from the high-
transmission prison environment [33]. Our model demonstrates that exit
screening would reduce the burden of disease among ex-prisoners and
therefore spill- over of TB from prisons into the community. Exit
screening could be even more effective in settings with low case-
detection rates in prison.
This is the first analysis to model the impact of prison-focused
interventions on preventing the spillover of TB into the general
population. WHO recently led a systematic review of the evidence on TB
case finding, but the panel was unable to reach consensus on active
screening among prisoners, citing very low-quality evidence [34]. The
conditional recommendation that it “should be considered” has not led to
widespread implementation among LMICs because of the resources and
high number of tests typically required to identify a case of active TB
[35,36]. Of the interventions modeled, we found active screening within
prisons to be the sin- gle most effective strategy in reducing TB incidence.
Whereas passive case detection, provision of IPT, entry screening, and
exit screening would have a more modest impact individually, a
combined intervention including all of these approaches, together with
mass screening, could avert nearly 80% of active TB cases in prisons and
40% of cases in the general population. Any public health interventions
directed toward prisons must consider the unique risks faced by prisoners,
57
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
S1 Text. Description of equations, assumptions, calibration process, intervention scenar- ios, and sensitivity analyses
applied to model of TB transmission dynamics. TB, tuberculo- sis.
(DOCX)
S1 Table. Summary of prison-based interventions implemented in the model.
(DOCX)
(DOC)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization: Tarub S. Mabud, Albert I. Ko, Ted Cohen, Julio Croda, Jason R.
Andrews.
Data curation: Tarub S. Mabud, Maria de Lourdes Delgado Alves,
Everton Lemos, Julio Croda.
Formal analysis: Tarub S. Mabud, Jason R. Andrews.
Funding acquisition: Jason R. Andrews.
Investigation: Tarub S. Mabud, Jason R. Andrews.
Methodology: Tarub S. Mabud, Albert I. Ko, Sanjay Basu, Katharine S.
Walter, Barun Math- ema, Caroline Colijn, Jason R. Andrews.
Project administration: Julio Croda, Jason R. Andrews.
Resources: Tarub S. Mabud, Julio Croda, Jason R. Andrews.
Software: Tarub S. Mabud.
Supervision: Julio Croda, Jason R. Andrews.
Validation: Tarub S. Mabud.
Visualization: Tarub S. Mabud.
Writing – original draft: Tarub S. Mabud.
Writing – review & editing: Tarub S. Mabud, Maria de Lourdes Delgado
Alves, Albert I. Ko, Sanjay Basu, Katharine S. Walter, Ted Cohen,
Barun Mathema, Caroline Colijn, Everton Lemos, Julio Croda, Jason R.
Andrews.
REFERENCES
1. Uplekar M, Weil D, Lonnroth K, Jaramillo E, Lienhardt C, Dias HM, et al. WHO’s new End TB Strategy. Lancet.
Elsevier; 2015; 385(9979): 1799–1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60570-0
2. Stuckler D, Basu S, McKee M, King L. Mass incarceration can explain population increases in TB and
multidrug-resistant TB in European and central Asian countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008; 105(36): 13280–
13285. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801200105 PMID: 18728189
3. Baussano I, Williams BG, Nunn P, Beggiato M, Fedeli U, Scano F. Tuberculosis Incidence in Prisons: A
Systematic Review. Menzies D, editor. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(12): e1000381. https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pmed.1000381 PMID: 21203587
4. Dara M, Acosta CD, Melchers NVSV, Al-Darraji HAA, Chorgoliani D, Reyes H, et al. Tuberculosis con- trol in
prisons: Current situation and research gaps. Int J Infect Dis. 2015; 32: 111–117. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.029 PMID: 25809766
5. Sacchi FÁ VPC, Pra Ç A RM, Tatara MB, Simonsen V, Ferrazoli L, Croda MG, et al. Prisons as reservoir for
community transmission of tuberculosis, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015; 21(3): 452–455. https://doi.
org/10.3201/eid2103.140896 PMID: 25642998
60
6. Jones TF, Woodley CL, Fountain FF, Schaffner W. Increased incidence of the outbreak strain of Myco- bacterium
tuberculosis in the surrounding community after an outbreak in a jail. South Med J. 2003; 96 (2): 155–157.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SMJ.0000053678.62096.6F PMID: 12630640
7. Stead WW. Undetected Tuberculosis in Prison. JAMA. 1978; 240(23): 2544. https://doi.org/10.1001/
jama.1978.03290230036021 PMID: 712956
8. Bur S, Golub JE, Armstrong JA, Myers K, Johnson BH, Mazo D, et al. Evaluation of an extensive tuber- culosis
contact investigation in an urban community and jail. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7(12): S417– S423.
9. Bishara H, Rorman E, Mor Z, Shechter-Amram D, Weiler-Ravell D. Tuberculosis Beijing strain outbreak in an
Israeli Arab rural community linked to an incarcerated immigrant. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014; 18 (12): 1502–
1504. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0429 PMID: 25517819
10. Kimerling ME, Slavuckij A, Chavers S, Peremtin GG, Tonkel T, Sirotkina O, et al. The risk of MDR-TB and
polyresistant tuberculosis among the civilian population of Tomsk city, Siberia, 1999. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis.
2003; 7(9): 866–872. PMID: 12971671
11. Gutierrez MC, Vincent V, Aubert D, Bizet J, Gaillot O, Lebrun L, et al. Molecular Fingerprinting of Myco-
bacterium tuberculosis and Risk Factors for Tuberculosis Transmission in Paris, France, and Surround- ing Area.
Am Soc Microbiol. 1998; 36(2): 486–492.
12. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2013. World Health Organization; 2013 [cited 2018
Aug 11]. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/91355
13. Coyle A, Fair H, Jacobson J, Walmsley R. Imprisonment worldwide: the current situation and an alterna- tive future.
Bristol: Policy Press;2016.
14. Carbone A da SS, Paião DSG, Sgarbi RVE, Lemos EF, Cazanti RF, Ota MM, et al. Active and latent tuberculosis
in Brazilian correctional facilities: A cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015; 15(1): 24.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0764-8 PMID: 25608746
15. Estevan AO, de Oliveira SM do VL, Croda J. Active and latent tuberculosis in prisoners in the Central- West
Region of Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013; 46(4): 515–518. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037- 8682-1441-
2013 PMID: 23904084
16. Lemos ACM, Matos ED, Bittencourt CN. Prevalence of active and latent TB among inmates in a prison hospital
in Bahia, Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2009; 35(1): 63–68. S1806-37132009000100009 PMID: 19219332
17. Bourdillon PM, Gonçalves CCM, Pelissari DM, Arakaki-Sanchez D, Ko AI, Croda J, et al. Increase in Tuberculosis
cases among prisoners, Brazil, 2009–2014. Emerg Infect Dis. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017;
23(3): 496–499. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2303.161006
18. Verborgh R, Max W. Using OpenRefine. Birmingham: Packt Publishing; 2013.
19. Pacheco AG, Saraceni V, Tuboi SH, Moulton LH, Chaisson RE, Cavalcante SC, et al. Validation of a
Hierarchical Deterministic Record-Linkage Algorithm Using Data From 2 Different Cohorts of Human
Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Persons and Mortality Databases in Brazil. Am J Epidemiol. Oxford
University Press; 2008; 168(11): 1326–1332. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn249 PMID: 18849301
20. Fonseca MGP, Coeli CM, de F de A Lucena F, Veloso VG, Carvalho MS. Accuracy of a probabilistic record
linkage strategy applied to identify deaths among cases reported to the Brazilian AIDS surveil- lance database.
Cad Saude Publica. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2010; 26(7): 1431–1438.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2010000700022
21. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput Vienna, Austria.
2014;
22. Therneau T, Lumley T. Survival: Survival analysis, including penalised likelihood. R Package version 2.35–7.
R Found Stat Comput. 2009 [cited 2018 Aug 11]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/
survival/survival.pdf
23. Hess K, Gentleman R. Muhaz: hazard function estimation in survival analysis. R Package version 1.2.6. R Found
Stat Comput. 2015 [cited 2018 Aug 11]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/muhaz/ muhaz.pdf
24. Sgarbi RVE, Da Silva Santos Carbone A, Paião DSG, Lemos EF, Simionatto S, Puga MAM, et al. A cross-
sectional survey of HIV testing and prevalence in twelve brazilian correctional facilities. Yu X-F, editor. PLoS
One. 2015; 10(10): e0139487. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139487 PMID: 26466312
25. Salomon JA, Wang H, Freeman MK, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Lopez AD, et al. Healthy life expectancy for 187
countries, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden Disease Study 2010. Lancet. Elsevier; 2012;
380(9859): 2144–2162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61690-0
61
26. Shea KM, Kammerer JS, Winston CA, Navin TR, Horsburgh CR. Estimated rate of reactivation
of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States, overall and by population subgroup. Am J
Epidemiol. 2014; 179(2): 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt246 PMID: 24142915
27. Sutherland I, Švandová E, Radhakrishna S. The development of clinical tuberculosis following
infection with tubercle bacilli. Tubercle. 1982; 63(4): 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-
3879(82)80013-5 PMID: 6763793
28. Andrews JR, Noubary F, Walensky RP, Cerda R, Losina E, Horsburgh CR. Risk of progression
to active tuberculosis following reinfection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis.
Oxford University Press; 2012; 54(6): 784–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir951 PMID:
22267721
29. Blower SM, McLean AR, Porco TC, Small PM, Hopewell PC, Sanchez MA, et al. The intrinsic
transmis- sion dynamics of tuberculosis epidemics. Nat Med. 1995; 1(8): 815–821.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ nm0895-815 PMID: 7585186
30. Blower SM, Dowlatabadi H. Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Complex Models of
Disease Trans- mission: An HIV Model, as an Example. Int Stat Rev. 1994; 62(2): 229.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1403510
31. Maceda EB, Gonçalves CCM, Andrews JR, Ko AI, Yeckel CW, Croda J. Serum Vitamin D
levels and risk of prevalent tuberculosis, incident tuberculosis and tuberculin skin test
conversion among prison- ers. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-
19589-3 PMID: 29343733
32. Paião DSG, Lemos EF, Carbone A da SS, Sgarbi RVE, Junior AL, da Silva FM, et al. Impact
of mass- screening on tuberculosis incidence in a prospective cohort of Brazilian prisoners.
BMC Infect Dis. BioMed Central; 2016; 16(1): 533. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-
1868-5 PMID: 27716170
33. Behr MA, Edelstein PH, Ramakrishnan L. Revisiting the timetable of tuberculosis. BMJ.
2018; 362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2738 PMID: 30139910
34. World Health Organization. Systematic screening for active tuberculosis: Principles and
Recommenda- tions. World Heal Organ Geneva. 2013; 1–123. WHO/HTM/TB/2013.04
35. Kranzer K, Houben RM, Glynn JR, Bekker LG, Wood R, Lawn SD. Yield of HIV-associated
tuberculosis during intensified case finding in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Lan- cet Infect Dis. 2010; 10(2): 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-
3099(09)70326-3 PMID: 20113978
36. Sekandi JN, Dobbin K, Oloya J, Okwera A, Whalen CC, Corso PS. Cost-effectiveness analysis
of com- munity active case finding and household contact investigation for tuberculosis case
detection in urban Africa. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2): e0117009.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117009 PMID: 25658592
37. Providing comprehensive medical services through a three-phase model in Malawian prisons:
an oper- ational toolkit. Medecins Sans Frontieres. 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 11].
www.msf.org/malawi
38. Glynn JR, Guerra-Assunção JA, Houben RMGJ, Sichali L, Mzembe T, Mwaungulu LK, et al.
Whole genome sequencing shows a low proportion of tuberculosis disease is attributable to
known close con- tacts in rural Malawi. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7): e0132840.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132840 PMID: 26181760
39. Shah NS, Auld SC, Brust JCM, Mathema B, Ismail N, Moodley P, et al. Transmission of
extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa. N Engl J Med. Mass Medical Soc;
2017; 376(3): 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1604544 PMID: 28099825
40. Middelkoop K, Mathema B, Myer L, Shashkina E, Whitelaw A, Kaplan G, et al. Transmission of
tubercu- losis in a South African community with a high prevalence of HIV infection. J Infect
Dis. Oxford Univer- sity Press; 2014; 211(1): 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu403
PMID: 25053739
41. Basu S, Andrews J. Complexity in Mathematical Models of Public Health Policies: A Guide for
Consum- ers of Models. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(10): e1001540.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001540 PMID: 24204214
62
6. DISCUSSÃO
BOURDILLON, P.M. et al. Increase in Tuberculosis Cases among Prisoners, Brazil, 2009–
2014. Emerging infectious diseases, v. 23, n. 3, p. 496, 2017.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de
Vigilância Epidemiológica. Tratamento diretamente observado (TDO) da TB na atenção
básica : protocolo de enfermagem / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em
Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica. – Brasília : Ministério da Saúde, 2011a.
168 p. : il. – (Série F. Comunicação e Educação em Saúde).
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de
Vigilância Epidemiológica. Manual de recomendações para o controle da tuberculose no
Brasil / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância
Epidemiológica. – Brasília : Ministério da Saúde, 2011b.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de
Vigilância das Doenças Transmissíveis. Brasil Livre da Tuberculose : Plano Nacional pelo
Fim da Tuberculose como Problema de Saúde Pública / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria
de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância das Doenças Transmissíveis. – Brasília
: Ministério da Saúde, 2017
FONSECA M.G.P et al.. Accuracy of a probabilistic record linkage strategy applied to identify
deaths among cases reported to the Brazilian AIDS surveillance database. Caderno de
Saúde Pública. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, v.7, n.26, p.
1431–1438, 2010.
MESFIN, M.M. et al. Delayed consultation among pulmonary tuberculosis patients: a cross
sectional study of 10 DOTS districts of Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, v. 9, n. 1, p. 53, 2009.
MOREIRA, T.R.; FÁVERO, J.L.; MACIEL, E.L.N.. Tuberculose no sistema prisional
capixaba. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Saúde/Brazilian Journal of Health
Research, v.12, n.1, p. 26-33, 2010.
72
NOGUEIRA, P. A.; ABRAHAO, R.M.C.M; GALESI, V. M.N. Tuberculosis and latent
tuberculosis in prison inmates. Revista deSaúde Pública, São Paulo , v. 46, n. 1, p. 119-
127, 2012 .
ODUSANYA, O.O.; BABAFEMI, J.O. Patterns of delays amongst pulmonary tuberculosis
patients in Lagos, Nigeria. BMC public health, v. 4, n. 1, p. 18, 2004.
PACHECO A.G et al. Validation of a Hierarchical Deterministic Record-Linkage Algorithm
Using Data From 2 Different Cohorts of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Persons
and Mortality Databases in Brazil. American Journal of Epidemiology. Oxford University
Press. v.168, n.11, p. 1326–1332, 2008.
PELISSARI, D. M. et al. Prevalence and screening of active tuberculosis in a prison in the
South of Brazil. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, v. 22, n.
10, p. 1166-1171, 2018.
PRASAD, B.M. et al. Status of tuberculosis services in Indian prisons. International Journal
of Infectious Diseases, v. 56, p. 117-121, 2017.
RIBEIRO MACEDO, L. et al. Treatment outcomes of tuberculosis patients in Brazilian
prisons: a polytomous regression analysis. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and
Lung Disease, v. 17, n. 11, p. 1427-1434, 2013.
RUDDY, M. et al. Rates of drug resistance and risk factor analysis in civilian and prison
patients with tuberculosis in Samara Region, Russia. Thorax, v. 60, n. 2, p. 130-135, 2005.
SANCHEZ, A. et al. X ray screening at entry and systematic screening for the control of
tuberculosis in a highly endemic prison. BMC public health, v. 13, n. 1, p. 983, 2013
SACCHI, F.PC et al. Prisons as reservoir for community transmission of tuberculosis,
Brazil. Emerging infectious diseases, v. 21, n. 3, p. 452, 2015.
SÁNCHEZ-PÉREZ, H. J. et al. Multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis in Los Altos, Selva
and Norte regions, Chiapas, Mexico. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung
disease, v. 14, n. 1, p. 34-39, 2010.
SCATENA L.M et al. Dificuldades de acesso a services para diagnostic de tuberculose em
municípios do Brasil. Revista de Saúde Pública, v.43, n.3, p.389-97, 2009.
SEKANDI, J.N. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of community active case finding and
household contact investigation for tuberculosis case detection in urban Africa. PLoS One, v.
10, n. 2, p. e0117009, 2015.
SMIEJA, M. et al. Isoniazid for preventing tuberculosis in non‐HIV infected persons. The
cochrane library, n.1, p. 1465-1858, 2000.
STUCKLER, D. et al. Mass incarceration can explain population increases in TB and
multidrug-resistant TB in European and central Asian countries. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, v. 105, n. 36, p. 13280-13285, 2008.
UPLEKAR M, et al. WHO’s new End TB Strategy. The Lancet. v.9979, n. 385, p. 1799–801,
2015.
73
URREGO, J. et al. The impact of ventilation and early diagnosis on tuberculosis transmission
in Brazilian prisons. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, v. 93, n. 4,
p. 739-746, 2015.
VALENÇA, Mariana Soares et al. Prevalence of tuberculosis in prisons: risk factors and
molecular epidemiology. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, v.
19, n. 10, p. 1182-1187, 2015.
WANG, L. et al. Tuberculosis prevalence in China, 1990–2010; a longitudinal analysis of
national survey data. The Lancet, v. 383, n. 9934, p. 2057-2064, 2014.
WARREN, Joshua L. et al. Investigating spillover of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis from a
prison: a spatial and molecular epidemiological analysis. BMC medicine, v. 16, n. 1, p. 122,
2018.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Tuberculosis control in prisons. A manual for
programme managers. Geneva: WHO; 2000.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Bending the curve: ending TB. Annual report
2017 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available in:
http://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/254762
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. Geneva:
WHO; 2018. Acesso em: 03 de novembro de 2018. Disponível em:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274453/9789241565646-eng.pdf?ua=1
YUHARA, L.S; SACCHI, F.P.C.; CRODA, J. Impact of latent infection treatment in indigenous
populations. PloS one, v. 8, n. 7, p. e71201, 2013.
74
ANEXO A – ARTIGO BASE DE LINHA
75
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) rates among prisoners are more than 20 times that of the general population in Brazil, yet
there are limited data available to facilitate the development of effective interventions in this high-transmission setting. We
aimed to assess risk factors for TB infection and evaluate the yield of mass screening for active disease among inmates.
Methods: We administered a questionnaire and tuberculin skin test (TST) to a population-based sample of inmates from
12 prisons in Central-West Brazil and collected sera for HIV testing and two sputum samples for smear microscopy and
culture from participants reporting a cough of any duration. Hierarchical Poisson regression models were used to evaluate
factors associated with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).
Results: We recruited 3,380 inmates, of which 2,861 (84.6%) were males from 8 prisons, and 519 (15.4%) were females from
4 prisons. Among the 1,020 (30%) subjects who reported a cough, we obtained sputum from 691 (68%) and identified 31
cases of active TB for a point prevalence of 917 (95% CI, 623–1302) per 100,000 prisoners. Evaluation of the two sputum
smear samples failed to identify 74% of the TB cases, and 29% of the cases reported less than 2 weeks of symptoms.
Obtaining a second culture identified an additional 7 (24%) cases. The prevalences of LTBI were 22.5% and 11.7% for male
and female prisoners, respectively and duration of incarceration (in years) was associated with LTBI in male and female in
the multivariable model (1.04, 95% CI, 1.01-1.07 and 1.34, 95% CI, 1.06-1.70, respectively). The prevalence of LTBI is
8.6% among newly incarcerated inmates, among whom LTBI prevalence significantly increased by 5% with each year of
incarceration.
Conclusions: Although the overall LTBI prevalence among inmates in Central-West Brazil is low, tuberculosis incidence is
high (>1,800/100,00), likely due to the high force of infection among a largely susceptible inmate population. Efforts to
reduce transmission in prisons may require mass screening for active TB, utilizing sputum culture in case-detection
protocols.
Keywords: Tuberculosis, Prisoners, TST, Infection, Active case detection, Screening cross-sectional study, Brazil,
Epidemiology
* Correspondence: juliocroda@ufgd.edu.br
2
Faculty of Health Sciences, Federal University of Grande Dourados,
Dourados, Brazil
5
Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Campo Grande, Brazil
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2015 Carbone et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The
Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise
stated.
76
subset of the system, in which prisoners do not leave the
Background
prison during their incarceration (in the contrast with the
Worldwide, the prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) among
“open” system for lower-risk offenders), there were a total of
prisoners is frequently an order of magnitude greater than that
9,913 inmates at 22 penal institutions. The popu- lation of the
in the general population [1]. In Brazil, which has the world’s
closed system in the 5 largest cities in the state (Campo
4th largest prisoner population, the incidence of TB in prisons
Grande, Corumbá, Dourados, Ponta Porã and Três Lagoas)
is approximately 20 times greater than that in the general
was included in a cross-sectional study performed between
population (>1,000 per 100,000 versus 46 per 100,000) [2,3].
January 2013 and December 2013 (Figure 1a). Twelve
Previous studies of Brazilian prisons have reported that the
prisons were included in the study, with a total of 7,221
prevalence of active TB and la- tent TB infection (LTBI)
prisoners representing 73% of the prisoners in the closed
range from 2 to 9% and from 40 to 73%, respectively [2-5].
system and 59% of the total prison population in the state. Of
The high incidence of TB in prisons contributes to a high
these 12 prisons, there were 8 male prisons (6,552 prisoners)
rate of TB transmis- sion among inmates, who serve as a
and 4 female prisons (669 prisoners).
persistent reser- voir for spillover TB transmission into the
general population [6,7].
Sample size calculation and study population
International and national guidelines concerning TB control
Prisoners who were 18 years of age and who consented to
in prisons recommend systematic screening using
participate were included in the study. Screening for
standardized symptom assessment and chest radiography to
tuberculosis (reported here) was performed alongside parallel
identify individuals requiring further investigation [8-12]. In
screening studies for HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and
particular, there remain critical questions about: the yield of
syphilis. The sample size was calculated based on the
symptom screening, smear microscopy and culture; the
expected prevalence of HIV, assuming 2% for HIV with a
number of sputum examinations that should be performed;
variation of 1%, power of 80% and alpha-type error of 5%.
and whether demographic attributes or re- ported risk factors
The study population is 7,221 prisoners, and the sample size
can effectively identify high-risk indi- viduals to target for
was 3,159 prisoners. We added 20% more individuals (total,
screening for LTBI and active TB.
3,771 prisoners) to account for an- ticipated loss due to
Few studies conducted in prisons in low- or middle- income
refusal to participate. Proportional stratified sampling was
countries have addressed the performances of smear and
performed using each prison as a unit of randomization. On
culture for screening active TB in the prisons [12-14]. In
the data collection day, the prisoners were ordered
Mato Grosso do Sul state, no control mea- sures other than
numerically in ascending order from the lists provided by the
passive case detection have been imple- mented, wherein
prison and a list of random numbers was generated using the
symptomatic inmates are referred for chest radiography,
Epi-Info 6.04 software (Atlanta, GA, USA).
smear and TB culture, all performed outside of the prisons.
Due to the high tuberculosis incidence, limited prison health
Data collection
budgets, and complex nature of conducting pub- lic health
Data collection for all twelve prisons was carried out over a
interventions in these settings, more evidence for mass
period of one year (01/07/2013 to 10/22/2013), with each
screening for tuberculosis is needed. We imple- mented a
prison being sequentially enrolled over a course of 1 to 3
large campaign in a network of 12 prisons in Central-West
weeks. Each participant underwent an interview util- izing a
Brazil to assess the yield of the mass screen- ing of inmates
standardized questionnaire. The variables obtained during the
for active TB. Furthermore, we evaluated the prevalence of
interview included gender, marital status, edu- cation,
tuberculin skin test (TST) positivity in this population to
smoking history, illicit drug use, diabetes, contact with a TB-
identify risk factors and risk groups for TB infection and to
positive individual (in the household or at other places), the
facilitate future intervention strategies. presence of a Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine scar
(as determined by inspecting the participant’s arm), previous
Methods
incarceration, number of prisoners per cell, TB symptoms in
Study setting and design
the cell and time in prison. The partici- pant’s race/skin color
Mato Grosso do Sul is a state in Central-West Brazil that
(i.e., white, black, indigenous, Asian or mixed) was self-
borders Paraguay and Bolivia. It is home to a popu- lation of
reported.
2.5 million people and has the highest rate of incarceration in
the country, predominately due to drug- trafficking crimes. In
Tuberculin skin testing
2013, there were 12,306 prisoners in the state, including
Two tuberculin units (0.1 ml) of RT23 PPD (Staten Serum
11,152 males and 1,154 females distributed between 37 penal
Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark) were injected
institutions. In the “closed”
intradermally into the volar aspect of the left forearm.
77
After 48 hours, the maximum diameter of the palpable mycobacterial growth. Radiography was not available in the
induration was measured by a trained TST reader. The TST prisons, and a TB case was therefore defined as the presence
was considered to be positive if the induration was ≥10 of at least one positive smear or culture.
mm, except in HIV-positive patients, for whom an
induration of ≥5 mm was considered to be positive. Tuberculosis outcomes
To assess outcomes of tuberculosis cases identified dur- ing
Smear and culture for M. tuberculosis the screening study, we linked data on cases with cases
All patients reporting a cough were asked to provide reported in the National Notifiable Diseases Information
sputum for an assessment of active TB. Two sputum System (SINAN). We classified outcomes according to
samples were collected, including one spot sample after World Health Organization definitions, as utilized by the
the interview and another the next morning. Smear mi- Brazil national tuberculosis programme.
croscopy and solid culture were utilized to test for Myco-
bacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis). The smear was HIV serology
conducted according to the Ziehl-Neelsen technique and All participants were offered HIV testing by serum ELISA,
was read by a trained microscopist. After completing the with positive tests confirmed by Western blot.
smear, the samples were processed using the Swab method
as described by Kudoh and Kudoh (1974) [15] and then Data analysis
decontaminated using the Petroff method, with a 5-minute All questionnaires were entered twice into Research
exposure to 4% NaOH [16]. Culturing was performed Electronic Data Capture (REDCap), which is a secure on- line
using modified Ogawa medium (pH 6.4) [17], inspected database. The questionnaires were compared to search for data
daily for visible evidence of growth, and main- tained for entry errors. SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA)
60 days until it was considered negative Time to culture and the R statistical software, version 3.1.1 (R Foundation
positivity was defined as the days from spu- tum collection for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) were used to
to identification and confirmation of analyze the univariate and multivariate models. The prevalence
of LTBI was expressed as the
78
percentage among inmates screened, and the prevalence of Table 1 Sociodemographics, prison variables and
active TB was expressed as the cases per 100,000 individ- uals, tuberculin skin test results stratified by gender in Mato
consistent with conventional metrics. We estimated the disease Grosso do Sul, Brazil (N = 3,380)
duration by dividing the prevalence to inci- dence of active TB. Gender
Tuberculosis incidence was estimated from notification data (Number/percentage)
obtained from the National Notifi- able Diseases Information Variables Male Female P value
System (SINAN), from which we identified all new cases of N = 2,861 N = 519
active TB reported in the 12 prisons during the study period. TST-positive 620/2752 (22.5) 60/511 (11.7) <0.01
Dichotomized and cat- egorical data were analyzed with the
Active TB 29/2861 (1) 2/519 (0) 0.2
chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. For continuous variables,
Reason for admission <0.01
the t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized.
Univariate ana- lyses were performed to verify the associations Drug trafficking 1142/2360 (48) 383/437 (88)
between the dependent and independent variables. Poissson Theft 741/2360 (31) 30/437 (7)
regression analysis was used to estimate the crude prevalence Homicide 324/2360 (14) 14/437 (3)
ratios (PRs). Those achieving a pre-specified level of Sexual abuse 64/2360 (3) 1/437 (0)
significance (p < 0.05) were included in the multivariable Other 87/2360 (4) 9/437 (2)
analysis. Multi-level mixed Poisson regression models were
Sociodemographics
used to estimate the risks of latent and active TB associated
with sociodemographics and exposure variables for the Age, years, mean ± SD 32 ± 10 32 ± 10 0.52
individ- uals nested within the prisons. Marital status, single 1522/2840 (54) 332/506 (66) <0.01
Race <0.01
White 912/2747 (33) 137/470 (29)
Ethical issues 1366/2747 (50) 283/470 (60)
Mixed
All eligible participants provided written informed con- Black
sent prior to study participation. The study was ap- 370/2747 (14) 34/470 (7)
proved by the Research Ethics Committee at the Federal Indigenous 37/2747 (1) 4/470 (1)
University of Grande Dourados (Number 191,877). Every Asian 62/2747 (2) 12/470 (3)
active TB patient identified during the study was noti- Resides in MS 1889/2861(66) 277/519 (53) <0.01
fied, underwent TB treatment and was provided with re- Less than 4 years 1195/2794 (43) 282/514 (55) <0.01
ferrals. No preventive therapy was provided for LTBI of schooling
because the Brazilian Ministry of Health does not rec- Diabetes 78/2399 (3) 22/494 (5) 0.18
ommend the treatment of LTBI in prisons [8]. Current smoker 1551/2830 (55) 284/519 (55) 0.97
Drug use over 1543/2861(54) 199/519 (38) <0.01
Results
Among the 3,771 prisoners recruited for the study, 391 the last year 176/2817 (6) 14/518 (3) <0.01
Previous TB
HIV-positive 45/2847 (1.6) 10/518 (1.9) 0.56
matesrefused
(10%) refusing to participate
to participate, and had similar
3,380 characteristics
were enrolled. In-
such as age, sex and reason for admission compared to Prison
those who screened. All enrolled participants completed Previously incarcerated 1758/2836 (62) 207/517 (40) <0.01
the study protocol (Figure 1b). The mean age of the par- Knows someone with TB 1196/2784 (43) 124/511 (24) <0.01
ticipants was 33.2 years (range, 18–80 years). The major- ity Prisoners per cell, mean 16 ± 12 22 ± 15 <0.01
of these individuals was from the state of Mato Grosso do ± SD
Sul (64%) and were men (85%). The prisoners’ self-reported Duration of 20 ± 27 12 ± 13 <0.01
racial groups included white (33%), mixed (51%), black incarceration, months,
(13%), indigenous (1%) and Asian (2%) (Table 1). There was mean ± SD
considerable variation between prisons with respect to prior Other prisoners 845/2830 (30) 211/517 (41) <0.01
coughing in the cell
history of drug use during the previous year (17-70%) and
TB (1-11%), inmates reporting knowing someone with TB
(11-63%), previous
incarceration (28 -75%) and mean duration of incarcer- ation incarcerated for drug trafficking (87%), theft (7%) and
(4.4-29.9 months) (Additional file 1: Tables S1a and b). The homicide (3%). Compared with women, men were more
most common reasons for the incarceration for men were likely to have used drugs during the past year (54% ver- sus
drug trafficking (48%), theft (30%) and homicide (14%). 38%, p < 0.01), have a positive history of TB (6% ver- sus
Women were also most frequently 3%, p < 0.01), know someone with TB (43% versus
79
24%, p < 0.01), or have been previously incarcerated (62% associated with increasing age (APR, 1.03, 95% CI, 1.00-1.06),
versus 40%, p < 0.01), and their duration of incar- ceration previous TB diagnosis (APR, 3.79, 95% CI,
was longer (20 months versus 12 months, p < 0.01) 1.52-9.48), previous incarceration (APR, 2.05, 95% CI, 1.16-
(Additional file 1: Tables S1a and b). 5.96), number of prisoners per cell (APR, 1.02, 95% CI, 1.01-
Of the 3,380 study participants, 1,020 reported a cough of 1.04), knowing someone with TB (APR, 2.05, 95% CI, 1.16-
any duration, and 691 (68%) were able to produce spu- tum. 3.52) and years of incarceration, among those without
Thirty-one participants had bacteriologically con- firmed TB, incarceration history (APR, 1.34, 95% CI, 1.06-1.70) (Table
corresponding to a point prevalence of 917 (95% CI, 623– 2).
1302) per 100,000 prisoners. Among the 31 cases, 29 (93%)
were culture-positive, and two were posi- tive by smear only.
Six cases were positive by both culture and smear, and Discussion
twenty-three of the 31 cases (74%) were culture-positive and Previous studies in Brazilian prisons have found preva-
smear-negative (Figure 1b). The me- dian time to culture lences of LTBI ranging from 49% to 73% [2-4,18]. This
positivity was 34 days (range, 18–66 days). Among the multicenter study, which was conducted in 12 prisons with
smear-positive cases, 75% were positive according to the first 3,360 inmates of both genders in Mato Grosso do Sul,
smear, and a second smear identified the remaining 25%. For revealed a comparatively low prevalence of LTBI that varied
the culture-positive cases, 76% of the first specimens tested from 15-33% in the male prisons and from 3- 16% in the
positive, with an additional 24% positive by the second female prisons. In particular, during the first month of
culture only. incarceration, the prevalence was very low (7.9% in males
Among the TB patients, 29 (96.2%) were men (median age, and 8.3% in females), which indicates that a large number of
32 years; range, 22–55 years), and 16 (51.6%) were from a individuals who enter prison are sus- ceptible to TB infection.
single prison (EPJFC) (Additional file 1: Tables S1a and b). The low prevalence of LTBI combined with the high point
Of the 27 patients notified and identified in the SINAN prevalence and incidence (951 and 1839 per 100,000,
electronic database, 21 (78%) completed the treatment and respectively) highlight the urgent need for new interventions
were cured, 2 (7%) died, 2 (7%) defaulted, in these settings to reduce TB transmission.
and 2 (7%) was transferred. Among the 31 patients, 1 patient In this study, previous incarceration was a significant in-
had already been diagnosed with TB 6 months ago and four dependent risk factor for LTBI among women, and trended
reported having had prior TB (48 months, 36 months, 24 towards significance as a risk factor for men. A number of
months and 12 months ago). In 2013, 142 TB cases from studies in prisons have demonstrated that pre- vious
12 prisons were reported to SINAN, which represented an incarceration [19,20] is associated with TST positiv- ity. In
incidence of 1,839 per 100,000 in- habitants. Comparing TB São Paulo, 55.1% of detainees have been identified as
notifications for 2013 with the point prevalence estimated infected individuals with previous arrests, and 75.6% have
here, the estimated duration of TB prior to diagnosis was 6 LTBI [21]. Previous incarceration has been strongly
months. associated with TB among the urban population, and
The prevalence of TST positivity among the different prisons genotypic data indicate that there is a considerable spill- over
ranged from 3.0% (EPFTL prison) to 32.0% (EPJFC prison) into the Dourados general urban population [22]. Moreover,
and was higher among men (22.5%) than women (11.7%) (p duration of incarceration was associated with TST positivity,
< 0.01). In a subset of 144 prisoners with ≤1 month of current controlling for other demographic risk fac- tors, which
incarceration and no prior his- tory of imprisonment, the further implicates prisons as the source of tu- berculosis
prevalence of TST positivity was 7.6%. Its prevalence infection rather than high-risk characteristics of the inmate
increased significantly by 5% per year with time spent in population.
prison for the entire prisoner population, with a greater slope Taken together, the low prevalence of TB among indi- viduals
of increase for women than for men (Figure 2). who were new to the prison system and the asso- ciation
Among the male prisoners, TST positivity was inde- between the duration of incarceration and LTBI positivity
pendently associated with increasing age (adjusted preva- imply that prisons are critical to TB transmis- sion. This
lence ratio [APR], 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01- finding underscores the need to implement mea- sures to
1.02), race (with white race as the reference; mixed: APR, control TB in this setting. This goal may require a combination
1.34, 95% CI, 1.10-1.63; black: APR, 1.43, 95% CI, 1.10- of biomedical interventions (improving diag- nostic capacity,
1.86; Asian: APR, 1.80, 95% CI, 1.16-2.90; indigenous: implementing active case detection strat- egies) and structural
APR, 1.25, 95% CI, 0.85-1.85), drug use within the past year interventions (reducing crowding, improving ventilation and
(APR, 1.29, 95% CI, 1.08-1.54), and years of incarcer- ation prison conditions) to achieve a substantial impact on the
(APR, 1.04, 95% CI, 1.01-1.07) (Table 2). Among the female extraordinary burden of TB in Brazilian prisons [23].
prisoners, TST positivity was independently
80
We found a lower prevalence of TST-positive inmates in the Estabelecimento de Segurança Máxima prison (EPJFC =
Centro de Triagem (CTAL = 16%) and Presidio de Trânsito 32%); these prisons also had higher TB notification rates
(PTCG = 15%) prisons, where prisoners are typic- ally held (Additional file 1: Tables S1a and b). In these initial, more
temporarily; these facilities generally serve as en- trances into temporary prisons, TB screening may be instituted using
the prison system. The highest prevalence rates were smear and culture in symptomatic inmates, and an initial TST
observed in the prisons in which the inmates remained for should be conducted in asymptomatic individuals, who
longer periods of time, such as the should potentially be monitored during incarceration.
Table 2 Risk factors associated with LTBI among male and female prisoners
Male (N = 2752) Female (N = 511)
Variables Crude PR Adjusted PR Crude PR Adjusted PR
Sociodemographics
Age, per year 0.99 (0.98-0.99) 1.02 (0.67-1.53) 1.03 (1.00-1.05) 1.03 (1.01-1.06)
Marital status, single 0.89 (0.76-1.04) 0.84 (0.48-1.48)
Race
White
Mixed 1.31 (1.08-1.59) 1.34 (1.10-1.63) 1.36 (0.69-2.71)
Black 1.40 (1.08-1.81) 1.43 (1.10-1.86) 2.32 (0.89-6.04)
Indigenous 1.28 (0.63-2.60) 1.25 (0.59-2.68)
Asian 1.72 (1.07-2.76) 1.80(1.12-2.90)
Resides in MS 0.83 (0.71-0.98) 1.13 (0.67-1.89)
No education 0.82 (0.69-0.96) 0.68 (0.41-1.13)
Diabetes 1.14 (0.71-1.82) 0.34 (0.05-2.41)
Current smoker 1.21 (1.03-1.42) 1.74 (1.01-2.98)
Drug use over the last year 1.21 (1.02-1.42) 1.29 (1.08-1.54) 1.05 (0.62-1.75)
BCG scar
Previous TB 1.50 (1.14-1.98) 3.14 (1.42-6.91) 3.79 (1.52-9.47)
HIV-positive 1.34 (0.79-2.27) 0.90 (0.13-6.44)
Prison
Previously incarcerated 1.24 (1.05-1.48) 1.39 (0.83-2.33) 2.44 (1.17-5.10)*
Knows someone with TB 1.16 (0.98-1.37) 2.55 (1.54-4.24) 2.02 (1.16-3.52)
Prisoners per cell, per person 0.99 (0.98-1.00) 1.02 (1.01-1.04) 1.02 (1.01-1.04)
Duration of incarceration, years 1.04 (1.01-1.07) 1.04 (1.01-1.07) 1.06 (0.87-1.31) 1.34 (1.06-1.70)*
Other prisoners coughing in the cell 1.04 (0.88-1.24) 1.05 (0.61-1.78)
*Adjusted for significant interaction term between these variables (p = 0.01).
81
Currently, the Brazilian Ministry of Health does not tuberculosis prevalence is likely low. The majority of cases
recommend treating LTBI in inmates with a positive TST were detected in just one prison, and it is unclear whether this
[8]. Our findings of the low LTBI prevalence upon prison was a higher-burden prison or whether these were point-
entry and high risk thereafter suggest that indi- viduals may source outbreaks. Genotyping of iso- lates may further clarify
be screened upon incarceration and periodic- ally thereafter this issue.
to detect the development of infections. Recent infection,
rather than late reactivation, likely drives the majority of Conclusions
tuberculosis in this setting. Thus, periodic screening, either The combination of the high TB prevalence identified in the
annually or among cellmates of a de- tected case, combined prisons evaluated, which is similar to reports from other
with isoniazid preventive therapy may be an effective prisons in Brazil and in other countries [1-5], with the large
intervention. proportion of susceptible individuals initially entering into
In the prisons examined in this study, as is common the prison system contribute to a high force of infection in
throughout Brazil, TB diagnoses are made when inmates this setting. Recent transmission, ra- ther than reactivation,
present to the prison clinic with relevant symptoms (i.e., likely is driving the tuberculosis epidemic in these prisons,
passive case finding). Actively searching for TB cases may and interventions will need to be focused towards
prove effective, as demonstrated by this study, which interrupting ongoing transmission. This situation represents
detected 31 cases of active TB among 3,380 pris- oners a social justice crisis, and mass screening for active and latent
screened. We observed that the two smears failed to detect TB infections must be implemented in Brazilian prisons.
74% of cases. This observation may indicate that individuals
were diagnosed earlier in their course of illness, but it also Additional file
suggests that a smear is insufficient for active case detection
in this setting. Additionally, be- cause a quarter of the cases
were only diagnosed follow- ing a second culture, we
advocate the collection of at least two specimens when
performing mass screening in prisons. Further studies are Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
needed to evaluate various diagnostic strategies, the yields
of various intervals of screening, and their cost- Authors’ contributions
effectiveness. ASSC, DSGP, RVE, and EFL were involved in the study conception and
The prevalence of LTBI in our study was lower than that design, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript drafting. RFL, MMO,
ALJ, JVBB and VPFE were involved in the data collection and manuscript
identified in other studies [2,18]. This difference is likely due drafting. SS, ASCMC, SMVLO, AIK, JRA and JC were involved in the study
to the low incidence of TB in the general population of the design and manuscript review. All authors have read, edited and approved
state of Mato Grosso do Sul. Only two studies have estimated the manuscript.
the prevalence of TST in two prisons located in the first and
Acknowledgments
third most populous cit- ies in Brazil (São Paulo and The authors are grateful to the State Agency of the Administration of Prisons for
Salvador, respectively), in which the majority of prisoners their full support during the study period. We thank the prisoner participants,
without whom this study could not have been performed. Our appreciation also
are former residents of slums, which are areas with high LTBI
extends to the staff of the UFGD TB study group for their support during the
rates. study, including Junio Pereira Pardins, Vinícius Neonato de Oliveira, Guilherme
The results of this study should be interpreted within the de Freitas Bezerra, and Sylka Rebelato Toppan. We would also like to extend
our gratitude to Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e
context of the limitations of the data. We screened all
Tecnologia do Estado do Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT, 0067/2012), the
individuals who reported cough of any duration, which while Ministry of Education (PROEXT), the Brazilian National Research Council
a more liberal screening definition than the WHO symptom (Ciências sem Fronteiras Program) and the Fogarty Global Health Equity
criteria (cough > 2 weeks), may never- theless fail to identify Scholars Program (NIH 1 R25 TW009338).
References
1. Baussano I, Williams BG, Nunn P, Beggiato M, Fedeli U, Scano F. Tuberculosis incidence in prisons: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(12):e1000381.
2. Lemos AC, Matos ED, Bittencourt CN. Prevalence of active and latent TB among inmates in a prison hospital in Bahia, Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2009;35(1):63–8.
3. Estevan AO, Oliveira SM, Croda J. Active and latent tuberculosis in prisoners in the Central-West Region of Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46(4):515–8.
4. Abrahão RM, Nogueira PA, Malucelli MI. Tuberculosis in county jail prisoners in the western sector of the city of São Paulo, brazil. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10(2):203–8.
5. Kuhleis D, Ribeiro AW, Costa ER, Cafrune PI, Schmid KB, Costa LL, et al. Tuberculosis in a southern Brazilian prison. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107(7):909–15.
6. Moreira TR, Fávaro JL, Maciel EL. Tuberculose no sistema prisional capixaba. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Saúde. 2010;12(1):26–33.
7. Stuckler D, Basu S, McKee M, King L. Mass incarceration can explain population increases in TB and multidrug-resistant TB in European and central Asian countries. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 2008;105(36):13280–5.
8. Brasil: Manual de recomendações para o controle da tuberculose no Brasil. In: Ministério da Saúde SdVeS, editor. Brasília: Departamento de Vigilância Epidemiológica; 2011.
9. Bone A, Aerts A, Grzemska M, Kimerling M, Kluge H, Levy M, et al. Tuberculosis control in prisons. A manual for programme managers. In: Edited by Organization WH; 2000.
10. Dara M, Grzemska M, Kimerling ME, Reyes H, Zagorskiy A. World Health Organization: Guidelines for control of tuberculosis in prisons. In: Edited by Cross TCfTAaICotR; 2009.
11. WHO: Status Paper on Prisons and Tuberculosis. In. Edited by Europe WHOaROf. Copenhagen; 2007.
12. Sanchez A, Gerhardt G, Natal S, Capone D, Espinola A, Costa W, et al. Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis and comparative evaluation of screening strategies in a
Brazilian prison. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9(6):633–9.
13. Sanchez A, Larouzé B, Espinola AB, Pires J, Capone D, Gerhardt G, et al. Screening for tuberculosis on admission to highly endemic prisons? The case of Rio de Janeiro State
prisons. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13(10):1247–52.
14. Fournet N, Sanchez A, Massari V, Penna L, Natal S, Biondi E, et al. Development and evaluation of tuberculosis screening scores in Brazilian prisons. Public Health.
2006;120(10):976–83.
15. Kudoh S, Kudoh T. A simple technique for culturing tubercle bacilli. Bull World Health Organ. 1974;51(1):71–82.
16. Salem JI, Marója MF, Carvalho FF, Lima MO, Litaiff LRL, L. Cardoso MS, et al. Valor relativo do exame direto, após concentração e por cultivo de escarro no diagnóstico
bacteriológico da tuberculose pulmonar no Amazonas.
J Pneumol. 1990;16:133–6.
17. David HL, Levy-Frebault V, Thorel MF: Mèthodes de Laboratoire pour Mycobactériologie Clinique. In. Edited by Pasteur I. Paris; 1989: 39–58.
18. Nogueira PA, Abrahão RM, Galesi VM. Tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis in prison inmates. Rev Saude Publica. 2012;46(1):119–27.
19. Nava-Aguilera E, Andersson N, Harris E, Mitchell S, Hamel C, Shea B, et al. Risk factors associated with recent transmission of tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13(1):17–26.
20. Margolis B, Al-Darraji HA, Wickersham JA, Kamarulzaman A, Altice FL. Prevalence of tuberculosis symptoms and latent tuberculous infection among prisoners in northeastern
Malaysia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17(12):1538–44.
21. Nogueira PA, Abrahão RMCM. A infecção tuberculosa e o tempo de prisão da população carcerária dos Distritos Policiais da zona oeste da cidade de São Paulo. Rev Bras
Epidemiol. 2009;12(1):30–8.
22. Sacchi FPC, Praça RM, Tatara MB, Simonsen V, Ferrazoli L, Gomes HM, et al. Incarceration is associated with tuberculosis in urban community. In: Dourados: Federal University
of Grande Dourados; 2014.
23. White MC, Nelson RW, Kawamura LM, Grinsdale J, Goldenson J. Changes in characteristics of inmates with latent tuberculosis infection. Public Health. 2012;126(9):752–9.
Resumos Internacionais
Resumos Nacionais
“High incidence of tuberculosis infection and disease in twelve Brazilian prisons” - Congresso
Brasileiro de Medicina Tropical (Maceió – AL, 2016), sendo premiado em 3º lugar, na categoria
Doutorado, recebendo o título de Jovem Pesquisador de 2016 da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina
Tropical;
“Estratégias para controle da tuberculose nas prisões do Brasil” publicado na revista PECIBES
(UFMS) recebeu as premiações: 1º lugar no III Prêmio de Pós-Graduação stricto sensu Dr Durval
Batista Palhares (Consulpit – Humap) e o 3º lugar no I Prêmio painel Maria Elizabeth Moraes
Cavalheiros Dorval (Consulpit – Humap) (
“Identificação de estratégias para o controle da tuberculose em prisões brasileiras” no Boletim da
Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia (SBI), premiado como um dos cinco melhores trabalhos
“Prêmio Manoel de Barros”
84
85
86
87
88
89
1
Pós Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias – UFMS
2
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados – UFGD
3
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz – Mato Grosso do Sul - FIOCRUZ
4
Yale University – USA
5
Stanford University - USA
No Brasil, um dos 22 países com a maior taxa da tuberculose, a incidência de tuberculose (TB)
nas prisões, segundo a OMS, é 25-50 vezes maior do que a população em geral. Até o momento,
não há dados sistemáticos sobre estratégias de triagem eficazes para o diagnóstico precoce e
prevenção da tuberculose no contexto de alta taxa como as prisões de países de renda baixa e
média. Assim o presente estudo identificou intervenções efetivas de controle da tuberculose nas
prisões do Brasil. Trata-se de um estudo prospectivo de coorte entre os indivíduos encarcerados
de prisões no estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Etapa 1. Realizamos uma coorte no período
de 2013 - 2015 de 12 prisões nas 5 maiores cidades do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, com o
objetivo de avaliar as taxas de infecção e doença e avaliar o impacto da triagem anual nas prisões
brasileiras. Etapa 2. Iremos exibir uma coorte com a realização da radiografia de tórax,
baciloscopia/cultura e Gene Xpert. A TB pulmonar será identificada por meio da radiografia de
tórax, cultura anual e Gene Xpert. Na etapa 1. de 7.221 presos nas 12 prisões, recrutamos 3.771
para o estudo, e 3.380 (90%) consentiram participar e foram inseridos. Após 1 ano, 1.422
participantes permaneceram encarcerados na mesma prisão. Este subconjunto compreende a
coorte prospectiva em que as conversões de Teste Tuberculínico (TT) e a incidência de TB foram
avaliadas. Realizou-se um questionário e aplicação do TT. Os indivíduos foram acompanhados
durante um ano no estudo de coorte e realizou um novo TT. Utilizamos Cox Proportional Hazards
para estimar os índices de risco bruto e de risco ajustado para TB ativa. Encontramos um risco
anual de infecção tuberculosa de 26% (IC 95%: 23 ± 29%) e incidência de TB ativa de 1.771 (IC
95%: 1.115 ± 2.614) por 100.000 habitantes. Os casos identificados através do rastreio ativo eram
menos susceptíveis de serem baciloscopia positiva do que os detectados passivamente (10% vs
51%, p <0,01), sugerindo a detecção precoce dos casos. No entanto, não houve redução da
incidência da doença entre os indivíduos rastreados ativamente versus aqueles não rastreados
(1,77% vs. 1,69%, p = 0,95). A conversão de TT e a incidência de TB ativa foram maiores no
sexo masculino do que nas mulheres (28% versus 10%, p <0,01 e 1,94% versus 0,53%,
respectivamente, p = 0,18). A tosse produtiva relatada no início do estudo (AHR 2,63; IC 95%:
1,13-6,15) e o uso de drogas ao longo de um ano (AHR 3,93; IC 95%: 1,31-11,79) foram
associados com TB ativa durante um ano de seguimento. Etapa 2. Vamos utilizar uma Unidade
Móvel, adaptada com as instalações apropriadas para realização dos Raio X e Gene Xpert móvel.
Com os testes de radiografia de tórax, baciloscopia, cultura e Gene Xpert, permitirá a identificação
da melhor estratégia de diagnóstico e controle da TB nas prisões
90
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
The transmission parameter, β was calculated for each population group in the model
using the following formula,
Equation 1:
β = λ/I
Equation 2:
1
λ=− ln(1 − 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑)
𝑡
97
where t is time. In this equation, t is set to 25 years, the average age of first
incarceration, and cumulative risk of infection at age 25 is 10%, yielding a force of
infection of 0.0042. With the prevalence of TB disease in Brazil obtained from WHO
surveillance data [3], it is possible to then solve for β.
Because prisoners, ex-prisoners, and community members can all experience the same
disease states, the set of differential equations for these three groups is largely identical.
The equations differ in that ex-prisoners and community members can be incarcerated
at rate q, while prisoners can be released at rate r. Additionally, while prisoners are only
infected (and reinfected) at a rate proportional to the imprisoned infectious population,
ex-prisoners and community members are susceptible to infection (and reinfection)
through contact with any infectious individual outside of the prison.
Annual release rates were derived from the SIGO report. We solved the following
system of equations using known values from Mato Grosso do Sul to determine the
incarceration rates for community members and ex-prisoners (qc and qe) at model
equilibrium:
Equation 3:
dC/dt = μN - qcC - μC
dP/dt = qcC + qeE - rP -
μP dE/dt = rP - qeE - μE
Individuals are born into the model as either susceptible, early latent, or late latent
community members, at a rate proportional to the overall population of the model. Birth
and death are equilibrated to maintain a fixed population. Upon introduction into the
model, individuals are assumed to be adults and of incarcerable age (15 years old). The
proportion of susceptible, early latent, and late latent individuals born into the population
(at age 15) are governed by the following exponential equations:
Equation 4:
Proportion S = 1-(1-e-
rt
) Proportion E = ⅓(1-
e-rt) Proportion L =
⅔(1-e-rt)
Here, the rate (r) is equivalent to the per capita force of infection for a community
member, β(Ic/Nc), and the time (t) is 15 years. We assume that the ratio of late latent to
early latent individuals born into the population at age 15 is 2:1.
98
We structured the model such that the total population is equal to 1, and each
compartment in the model is a proportion. For both the infectious and susceptible
individuals at the initiation of the model, we assumed that 0.5% were prisoners, 0.5%
were ex-prisoners and 99% were community members, and brought it to equilibrium as
governed by incarceration, release, birth and death rates.
Equation 5.
Np =
Sp+Ep+Lp+Ip+Rp Ne
= Se+Ee+Le+Ie+Re
Nc =
Sc+Ec+Lc+Ic+Rc
Prisoners
dSp/dt = -βp(Ip/Np)Sp - μpSp + qcSc + qeSe - rSp
dEp/dt = βp(Ip/Np)Sp - wpEp - τpEp - μpEp + qcEc + qeEe - rEp + α1βp(Ip/Np)Lp + α2Rp
dLp/dt = wpEp - vpLp - μpLp +qcLc + qeLe - rLp - α1βp(Ip/Np)Lp
dIp/dt = τpEp + vpLp - dpIp - μpIp +qcIc +qeIe + γRp - rIp
dRp/dt = dpIp - μpRp + qcRc + qeRe - rRp - α2Rp - γRp +qcIc +qeIe
Ex-prisoners
dSe/dt = -βe(Ie/(Ne+Nc))Se - βc(Ic/(Nc+Ne))Se - μeSe + rSp -qeSe
dEe/dt = βe(Ie/(Ne+Nc))Se + βc(Ic/(Nc+Ne))Se - weEe - τeEe - μeEe + rEp - qeEe +
α1(βe(Ie/(Ne+Nc))Le
+ βc(Ic/(Nc+Ne))Le) + α2Re
dLe/dt = weEe - veLe - μeLe + rLp - qeLe - α1(βe(Ie/(Ne+Nc))Le + βc(Ic/(Nc+Ne))Le)
96
Community
dSc/dt = ((1-(1-e(-βc(Ic/Nc)15)))μN - βe(Ic/(Nc+Ne))Sc - βc(Ie/(Ne+Nc))Sc - μcSc -qcSc
dEc/dt = (1/3)(1-e(-βc(Ic/Nc)15))μN + βe(Ic/(Nc+Ne))Sc + βc(Ie/(Ne+Nc))Sc - wcEc - τcEc -
μcEc - qcEc + α1(βe(Ic/(Nc+Ne))Lc + βc(Ie/(Ne+Nc))Lc) + α2Rc
dLc/dt = (2/3)(1-e(-βc(Ic/Nc)15))μN + wcEc - vcLc - μcLc - qcLc - α1(βe(Ic/(Nc+Ne))Lc +
βc(Ie/(Ne+Nc))Lc)
dIc/dt = τcEc + vcLc - dcIc - μcIc + γRc - qcIc
dRc/dt = dcIc - μcRc - qcRc - α2Rc - γRc
Model calibration
We calibrated the model to our calculated TB incidence data from Mato Grosso
do Sul. We fitted only a small set of model parameters which was not well
characterized by past studies or our data (Table 1); attempting to fit all of the
parameters in our model would generate specious values which would nicely fit
data points, but lack real-world validity [9]. Parameter fitting allowed us to
characterize epidemiological parameters for which there is currently a poor
understanding, such as the rate of TB progression from high-risk early latency to
lower-risk late latency among prison inmates, as well as the rate of TB diagnosis
in the prisons.
Equation 6:
A = Sum squared error prisoners= Sum(Calculated incidence - model incidence)2
B = Sum squared error ex-prisoners and community = X*Sum(Calculated
incidence - mode incidence)2
Combined sum squared error = A+B
Intervention scenarios
Various administrative interventions were implemented in the model, as
described in S1 Table, to explore the effects of prison-based intervention on
97
community TB burden. Each of the interventions was applied after the base
model reached equilibrium, and each intervention was run for a period of 10
years.
Equation 7.
pp*RI*Ic + (1-pp)*Ic = 140/100k
The incidence in prisons (Ip) is then calculated as the product of Ic and RI for
each point in the matrix. Thereafter, the prevalence in the community (Pc) and
in prisons (Pp) is calculated from each of the Ic,Ip values, as the product of
incidence and duration of infection (d).
We then fit the model to each Pc,Pp value set (with β terms fitted as described in
Methods, and with qc coming from the values solved as described), to get the
model prevalence for the active diagnosis intervention, allowing us to calculate a
percent decrease for each point on the pp vs RI matrix of Pc,Pp values.
REFERENCES
_______________________________________________________
Julio Henrique Rosa Croda
Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde.
Rodovia Dourados Itaum Km 12, 79804-970 - Dourados, MS - Brasil - Caixa-
Postal: 322
Telefone: (067) 34102320
Nome:_______________________________________.
RG: _________________________________________.
103
APENDICE B – QUESTIONÁRIO
UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA GRANDE DOURADOS
FACULDADE DE CIEÊNCIAS DA SAÚDE
INFORMAÇÕES GERAIS
1. Número do questionário __ __ __ __
4. Digitador: ____________________
6. Cidade: ________________
7. Presídio: ____________________________
8. Pavilhão: __________________________
11. Sexo: __
17. Você fumou no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não. Se não, pular para a questão 41.
Você usou Quantas vezes você a usou? Durante: Em: Você usou na
no último (1) Menos de uma vez na (1) Dia (1) Dias de prisão?
ano? semana (2) Noite semana (1) Sim
(1) Sim (2) 1-2 vezes na semana (3) Os (2) Finais (2) Não
(2) Não (3) + de 3 vezes na semana dois de semana
(4) Todos os dias (3) Os dois
Álcool 19. 28. 37. 46. 55.
Maconha 20. 29. 38. 47. 56.
104
TB
64. Você teve TB no ultimo ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não (3) Não sabe. Se não vá para a questão 70.
69. Tipo de alta (a última): __ (1) Cura (2) Abandono (3) Não sabe
70. Você conheceu alguém com TB no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não (3) Não sabe. Se não, vá
para a questão 72
71. Você tem contato com essa pessoa? __ (1) Menos de uma vez na semana (2) 1-2 vezes na
semana
(3) + de 3 vezes na semana (4) Todos os dias
72. Há pessoas na sua cela com tosse, febre ou emagreceu? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
73. Você tem tosse? (1) Sim (2) Não. Se não vá para a questão 75.
75. Você tem expectoração? __ (1) Sim (2) Não. Se não vá para a questão 78.
80. Você emagreceu neste último ano ou está emagrecendo? __ (1) Sim (2) Não.
81. Você tem sudorese noturna? __ (1) Sim (2) Não. Se não vá para a questão 83
105
91. Você fez alguma transfusão sanguínea no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
93. Você fez tatuagem no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
96. Você fez piercing no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
98. Você tem ou teve corrimento uretral no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
99. Você tem ou teve verruga no pênis ou vagina no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
100. Você tem ferida no pênis ou vagina? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
101. Você teve relação sexual com parceiro usuário de droga ilícita não-injetável no último ano? __ (1)
Sim (2) Não
102. Você teve relação sexual com usuário de droga injetável no último ano? (1) Sim (2) Não
103. Você teve relação sexual com parceiro com HIV no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
108. Se for heterossexual, você já teve alguma relação homossexual? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
109. Você usou camisinha nas relações sexuais no último ano? __ (1) Sempre (2) Ás vezes (3) Nunca
110. Você fez compartilhamento de seringas/agulhas no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
106
111. Você compartilhou no último ano objetos para realizar tatuagem, alicate, aparelho de barbear, para
uso de droga inalatória? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
112. Realizou alguma cirurgia no último ano? __ (1) Sim (2) Não
EXAMES REALIZADOS
Prova tuberculínica
Avaliação:
Sorologias