UNIVERSIDADE DE SO PAULO

FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, LETRAS E CINCIAS HUMANAS DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA

TICA E FILOSOFIA POLTICA II 1 semestre de 2012 Disciplina Optativa Destinada: alunos de filosofia e de outros departamentos Cdigo: FLF0389 Pr-requisito: FLF0113 e FLF0114 Prof. Alberto Ribeiro G. de Barros Carga horria: 120 horas Crditos: 06 Nmero mximo de alunos por turma: 80

TTULO: Dois conceitos de liberdade: Hobbes e Harrington

I OBJETIVO

A disciplina tem a inteno de analisar a noo de liberdade nos escritos polticos de Thomas Hobbes e James Harrington. O intuito mostrar como a concepo de cada um desses filsofos est na origem de duas maneiras distintas de entender a liberdade poltica na modernidade: a liberdade no sentido negativo, que vai caracterizar a idia de liberdade no pensamento liberal, e a liberdade como no-dominao, que vai caracterizar a idia de liberdade no pensamento republicano.

II - CONTEDO

1. Introduo: por que rever a noo de liberdade em Hobbes e Harrington? 2. A liberdade negativa em Hobbes 2.1. A questo da obrigao poltica

UNIVERSIDADE DE SO PAULO
FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, LETRAS E CINCIAS HUMANAS DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA

2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 2.5.

A noo de liberdade nos Elementos da Lei Natural e Poltica A noo de liberdade em Do cidado A noo de liberdade no Leviat Liberdade dos sditos e liberdade do Estado

3. A liberdade republicana em Harrington 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 3.4. A excelncia do regime republicano A noo de liberdade na Repblica de Oceana Liberdade como no-dominao Liberdade e lei

4. Concluso III - MTODOS UTILIZADOS

Aulas expositivas e seminrios de anlise de texto. IV - ATIVIDADES DISCENTES

1. Seminrio acompanhado de relatrio a ser entregue no dia da apresentao. 2. Dissertao a ser entregue at o ltimo dia de aula.

V - CRITRIOS DE AVALIAO

A nota final ser a nota do seminrio ou da dissertao.

VI - BIBLIOGRAFIA

Fontes primrias Harrington, James. The commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics (ed. J. G. A. Pocock). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

UNIVERSIDADE DE SO PAULO
FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, LETRAS E CINCIAS HUMANAS DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA

_________. La Republica de Oceana (trad. Enrique Canedo). Mxico: Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1996. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. London: Penguin Classics, 1985. __________. The Elements of Law Natural and Politic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. __________. Leviat (trad. Joo Paulo Monteiro). So Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2004. __________. Do Cidado (trad. Renato J. Ribeiro). So Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1992.

Fontes secundrias Andrew , Edward G. Hobbes on Conscience within the Law and without. In: Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Jun., 1999), pp. 203-225. Blitzer, Charles. An immortal commonwealth: the political thought of James Harrington. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960. Carlyle, A. J. Political Liberty: a history of the conception in the middle ages and modern times. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1941 Cotton, James. James Harrington as Aristotelian. In: Political Theory, Vol. 7, No. 3 (Aug., 1979), pp. 371-389. Cragg, Gerald R. Freedom and Authority: a study of English thought in the early seventeenth century. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1975 Cromartie, Alan. Harringtonian virtue: Harrington, Machiavelli, and the method of the moment. In: The Historical Journal, v.41, n.4, 1998, p.987-1009. Fink, Z. S. The classical republicans: an essay in the recovery of a pattern of thought in seventeenth-century England. Northwestern University Press, 1962 Forster, Greg. Divine law and human law in Hobbess Leviathan. In: History of Political Thought. Vol. XXIV. No. 2, 2003, p.189-217 Freeman, David A. The science of republicanism: Hobbes and Publius. In The Social Science Journal 42, 2005, p.351-358 Fukuda, Arihiro. Sovereignty and the sword. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1997 Goldie, Mark. The civil religion of James Harrington. In: The languages of political theory in early-modern Europe, (ed. Anthony Pagden). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987, p.197-222. Goldsmith, M. M. Hobbess Science of Politics . New York: Columbia University Press, 1966. Goyard-Fabre, S. Le droit et la loi dans la philosophie de Thomas Hobbes. Paris: Klinsksieck, 1975. King, Preston (ed.) Thomas Hobbes: critical assessments . London: Routledge, 2000. Macpherson, C. B. The political theory of possessive individualism, Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970

UNIVERSIDADE DE SO PAULO
FACULDADE DE FILOSOFIA, LETRAS E CINCIAS HUMANAS DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOSOFIA

Oakeshott, Michael. Hobbes on Civil Association. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2000. Pettit, Philip. Liberty and Leviathan. In: politics, philosophy & economics 4(1), p.131-151. Pocock, J. G. A. (ed.) The varieties of British political thought, 1500-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. _______. James Harrington and the Good Old Cause: A Study of the Ideological Context of His Writings. In: The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Nov., 1970), pp. 30-48 Remer, Gary. James Harringtons new deliberative rhetoric: reflection of an anticlassical republicanism. In: History of political thought. Vol. XVI. No. 4. Winter 1995, pp. 532-557 Ribeiro, Renato J. A marca do Leviat. So Paulo: tica, 1978 __________. Ao leitor sem medo. So Paulo: Brasiliense, 1984 Skinner, Quentin. Liberdade antes do liberalismo. So Paulo: Unesp, 1998. _________. The Ideological Context of Hobbes's Political Thought. In: The Historical Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3 (1966), pp. 286-317 _________. Razo e retrica na filosofia de Hobbes. So Paulo: Ed. Unesp/ Cambridge University Press, 1997. _________. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 Smith, H. F. Russell. Harrington and his Oceana: a study of a 17th century utopia and its influence in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1914 Sorel, Tom. The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 Strauss, Leo. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes . Chicago : Chicago University Press, 1963. Sullivan, Vickie B. Machiavelli, Hobbes, and the Formation of a Liberal Republicanism in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Tuck, Richard. Natural rights theories. Their origin and development. Cambridge: University Press, 1995 Vaughan Geoffrey M. The audience of Leviathan and the audience of Hobbes political philosophy . In: History of Political Thought. Vol. XXII. No. 3, 2001, p.448-471 Worden, Blair. James Harrington and The Commonwealth of Oceana. In: Republicanism, Liberty, and Commercial Society (ed. David Wootton). California: Stanford University Press, 1994, p.82-110 Wootton, David (ed.) Republicanism, Liberty and Commercial Society, 16491776. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994. Zarka, Yves C. (ed). Hobbes et la pense politique moderne. Paris: PUF, 1995