Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Note
ABSTRACT: A number of important factors may affect seed priming response, including seed quality. Effects
of seed vigor on seed priming response were investigated using seed lots of two muskmelon (Cucumis melo
L.) cultivars. Seeds of muskmelon, cvs. Mission and Top Net SR were artificially aged at 43°C for 0, 20 and
40 hours. Seeds were primed for six days in darkness at 25°C in KNO3 (0.35 mol L-1) aerated solution. Aged
seeds germinated poorly at 17°C. Priming increased germination rate at 17 and 25°C and germination percentage
at 17°C. An interaction effect on germination performance between vigor and priming was observed, especially
at low temperature. Priming increased germination performance in seeds of low vigor, and the response was
cultivar dependent.
Key words: germination, osmoconditioning, cultivars, stand establishment
RESUMO: A resposta do condicionamento osmótico pode ser afetada por importantes fatores, incluindo a
qualidade das sementes. Efeitos no vigor de sementes em resposta ao condicionamento osmótico foram
investigados utilizando diferentes lotes de duas cultivares de melão (Cucumis melo L.). Sementes de melão
cvs. Mission e Top Net SR foram artificialmente envelhecidas a 43°C por 0, 20 e 40 horas. Sementes foram
osmoticamente condicionadas por seis dias no escuro a 25°C em solução aerada de KNO3 (0.35 mol L-1).
Sementes envelhecidas apresentaram uma baixa germinação a 17°C. O condicionamento osmótico aumentou
a velocidade de germinação a 17 e 25°C e a porcentagem de germinação a 17°C foi observada interação
significativa na germinação entre o vigor das sementes e o condicionamento especialmente em condições de
baixas temperaturas. O condicionamento osmótico melhorou o desempenho da germinação das sementes de
baixo vigor, e a resposta foi dependente da cultivar.
Palavras-chave: germinação, cultivares, estabelecimento de plântulas
Table 1 - ‘Mission’ muskmelon unprimed and primed seed germination (GT) and germination rate (GR) at two temperatures
and different seed aging levels.
Te mp e r a tur e ( º C )
17 25
F a c to r Tr e a tme nt GR GT GR GT
d a ys % d a ys %
0 4.3 c 95 a 1.4 b 99 a
Aging ( ho ur s ) 20 6.1 b 62 b 1.5 a 100 a
40 7.1 a 48 c 1.5 a 100 a
LS D * 0.55 6.40 0.07 1.52
P r ime d ( P ) 3.6 b 97 a 1.0 b 99 a
Seeds
Unp r ime d ( U) 8.1 a 41 b 1.9 a 100 a
LS D * 1.57 30.67 0.07 1.28
0 xP 3.4 d 98 a 1.0 b 98 a
0 xU 5.2 b 92 a 1.9 a 100 a
20 x P 3.2 d 95 a 1.1 b 100 a
I nte r a c tio n
20 x U 9.0 a 30 b 2.0 a 100 a
40 x P 4.2 c 97 a 1.0 b 100 a
40 x U - 0 c 2.0 a 100 a
LS D * 0.78 9.04 0.10 2.14
*Means within a column followed by the same letter were not different by Least Significant Difference (LSD) test, at α = 0.05.
‘Mission’ cultivar. At 25°C, germination and germination response of priming was cultivar-dependent; using the
rate of unprimed seeds reduced with aging treatments ‘Persia 202’ cultivar the beneficial effects of low tempera-
(Table 2). Priming increased germination rate at 25°C. ture germination were maintained, whereas using ‘Noy
Seeds from all treatments germinated poorly at 17°C and Yizre’el’, the germination was reduced. In another study,
seeds aged for 40 hours and untreated failed to germi- priming affected muskmelon seeds differently, depending
nate (Table 2). Priming increased germination of aged on their stage of development (Welbaum & Bradford,
seeds, but not as high as for the unaged seeds. For ex- 1991).
ample, unaged seeds germinated 92%, whereas 20- and However, Nascimento & West (2000) reported
40- hour-aged primed seeds germinated 62 and 68%, re- the importance of drying conditions during seed prim-
spectively. ing and that the main benefits of using muskmelon
Aged (low vigor) seeds germinated poorly at primed seeds (i.e, germination at low temperature) may
17°C. These results support the fact that high seed vigor be lost following unfavorable drying conditions. In ad-
is responsible for tolerance to environmental stress dition, Oluoch & Welbaum (1996a; 1996b) found that
(Heydecker, 1972), including low temperatures. The re- priming was deleterious for ‘Top Mark’ muskmelon
sponse of aging might be related to not only the cultivar seed longevity. For tomato, the enhancement of seed
differences but also to seed quality; a greater reduction germination rate by priming treatments lowered the re-
in seed quality due to aging occurred for ‘Top Net SR’ sistance of seeds in relation to deterioration (Argerich
seeds in relation to ‘Mission’. Differences observed in the et al., 1989). However, priming may unchange, reduce
germination rate from the two cultivars suggest that the or improve seed quality, depending on the seed vigor
seed quality of the ‘Mission’ cultivar could explain this criteria used in these studies (Argerich & Bradford,
(Tables 1 and 2). 1989).
Priming increased seed performance and reduced The improvement in germination performance re-
differences in seed quality. Priming increased germina- sulting from priming treatments has been suggested as a
tion rate of aged seeds at both temperatures and the total result of repair mechanisms that occur during soaking
germination at 17°C. In general, the effects of seed prim- (Burgass & Powell, 1984); the seeds during the matura-
ing on muskmelon seed germination have been mainly tion process and/or during storage deteriorate and need
observed for sub-optimal conditions (Bradford, 1985; repair during imbibition in order to germinate (Osborne,
Bradford et al., 1988), and this was confirmed in this 1983). Thus, aged (more deteriorated) seeds could ben-
study. However, Nerson & Govers (1986) found that the efit more from priming treatments.
Table 2 - ‘Top Net’ muskmelon unprimed and primed seed germination (GT) and germination rate (GR) at two temperatures
and different seed aging levels.
Te mp e r a tur e ( º C )
17 25
F a c to r Tr e a tme nt GR GT GR GT
d a ys % d a ys %
0 6.1 c 67 a 1.7 b 93 a
Aging ( ho ur s ) 20 7.0 b 32 b 2.0 a 87 ab
40 8.0 a 34 b 2.1 a 84 b
LS D * 0.33 7.40 0.20 6.95
P r ime d ( P ) 4.9 b 74 a 1.5 b 87 a
Seeds
Unp r ime d ( U) 9.2 a 15 b 2.4 a 89 a
LS D * 1.05 8.54 0.16 5.80
0 xP 4.6 d 92 a 1.3 d 90 ab
0 xU 7.6 b 43 c 2.2 b 97 a
20 x P 4.1 e 62 b 1.7 c 87 b
I nte r a c tio n
20 x U 10.0 a 2 d 2.4 a 88 ab
40 x P 6.1 c 68 b 1.6 c 85 b
40 x U - 0 d 2.6 a 83 b
LS D * 0.47 10.46 0.29 9.83
*Means within a column followed by the same letter were not different by Least Significant Difference (LSD) test, at α = 0.05.