Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
PPGE 2023.3
Prof. Danilo Freitas Ramalho da Silva
e-mail: danilo.ramalho@ufabc.edu.br
Objetivos
O objetivo do curso é discutir a evolução da ciência econômica moderna e o
estabelecimento da teoria neoclássica como sua corrente principal no pós-guerra. Para
tal, serão analisados episódios determinantes na história do pensamento econômico do
século XX, principalmente relacionados ao desenvolvimento da macroeconomia
neoclássica moderna. Serão discutidas, também, as principais ideais da macroeconomia
neoclássica moderna de forma a analisar alguns dos seus conceitos fundamentais.
Avaliação
Artigo a ser entregue no final do curso.
Hicks, J. (1937). Mr. Keynes and the Classics. Econometrica 5 (2): 147-159.
Hoover, K. D., De Vroey, M. (2004). Introduction: Seven Decades of the IS-LM Model.
In: Hoover, K. D., De Vroey, M. (eds.) The IS-LM Model: Its Rise, Fall, and Strange
Persistence. Suplemento anual, HOPE 36: 1-11.
(*) De Vroey, M. (2016). A History of Macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and
Beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press. Caps. 2 e 3.
5. Monetarismo (17/10)
Friedman, M. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy. American Economic Review 58 (1):
1-17.
(*) De Vroey, M. (2016). A History of Macroeconomics from Keynes to Lucas and
Beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cap. 4.
Phillips, A. W. (1958). The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of
Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957. Economica 25 (100): 283-299.
Samuelson, P. A., Solow, R. M. (1960). Analytical Aspects of Anti-Inflation Policy.
American Economic Review 50 (2): 177-194.
Forder, J. (2014). Macroeconomics and the Phillips Curve Myth. Oxford: Oxford
University Press. Introdução e Caps. 7 e 8.
Lucas Jr., R. E. (1972). Testing the Natural Rate Hypothesis. In Robert E. Lucas Jr.,
Studies in Business Cycle Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981: 90-103.
Lucas Jr., R. E. (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A Critique. Carnegie-Rochester
Conference Series on Public Policy 1 (1): 19-46.
Gordon, R. J. (1976). Can Econometric Policy Evaluations Be Salvaged? A Comment.
Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1 (1): 47-61.
Lucas Jr., R. E. (1976). Reply. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy
1 (1): 62.
Mankiw, N. Gregory (1985). Small menu costs and large business cycles: a
macroeconomic model of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics 100 (2): 529-37.
Mankiw, N.G. and Romer D, (1991). New Keynesian Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Shapiro, Carl; Stiglitz, Joseph (1984). Equilibrium unemployment as a worker
discipline device. Quarterly Journal of Economics 74 (3): 433–444.
Akerlof, G. Yellen, J., (1985). A near-rational model of the business cycle with wage
and price inertia. Quarterly Journal of Economics 100 (supl.): 823-838.
Blanchard, Olivier Jean; Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro (1987). Monopolistic competition and the
effects of aggregate demand. American Economic Review 77 (4): 647–666.
Ball, L, Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D. (1988). The New Keynesian Economics and the
Output-Inflation Trade-Off. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988 (1): 1-82.
Goodfriend, M., King, R. (1997). The New Neoclassical Synthesis and the Role of
Monetary Policy. In Bernanke, B., Rotemberg, J. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual
1997. Cambridge: MIT Press, págs. 231–283.
(*) De Vroey, M. e Duarte, P. G. (2013). In Search of Lost Time: the neoclassical
synthesis. The B. E. Journal of Macroeconomics. Vol. 13. Issue 1. 965 – 995.