Você está na página 1de 26

A fabricação do Antigo Testamento que os

israelitas eram escravos no Egito


3/22/2015 02:20:00 AM

Parece que os judeus ter mentido sobre a sua história


no Antigo Testamento. Nova evidência esmagadora por
estudiosos egípcios e israelenses top mostra que os
judeus nunca foram escravos no Egito.
Pictures e legendas por Darkmoon
Se os judeus tivessem vivido no Egito durante séculos como escravos,
certamente eles teriam notado as pirâmides e da Esfinge?
Estranhamente, nenhum desses grandes maravilhas arquitetônicas do
mundo são mencionados mesmo uma vez no Antigo Testamento!
Judeus mentem. Os judeus sempre mentiu. E com toda a certeza, os judeus
ainda estão mentindo hoje sobre tudo o que tem a ver com eles mesmos e sua
história sórdida.

Assim, considerando como eles destruíram os Estados Unidos, Rússia,


Alemanha e muitos outros países por vestimenta lobotomizante mentalmente e
castrar todos eles financeiramente, deve vir como nenhuma surpresa que os
judeus têm falsificado sua própria história desde o início.

Ou, dito de forma mais concisa, nas palavras de um médico egípcio chamado
Ashraf Ezzat:

"A verdade é que o antigo Egito nunca soube nenhum Faraós nem
quaisquer israelitas. Egito nunca foi a terra do Êxodo e da Palestina
nunca foi à Terra Prometida. "

Apoiado por cada especialista respeitável no mundo conhecido, Ezzat


argumenta que a história antiga hebraico como a conhecemos hoje, é baseado
em uma mentira colossal - que os eventos descritos como acontecendo no
Egito, se eles aconteceu em tudo, realmente aconteceu na Arábia. O que
significa que de acordo com sua versão, os contos de José, Moisés e do êxodo
ainda pode ser verdade, mas o local em que eles são acusados de ter
acontecido são falsas.

Para a pessoa média, isto parece uma afirmação absurda, se não fosse o
testemunho solidário dos melhores egiptólogos do mundo, de James Henry
Breasted para Donald Redford para Israel Finkelstein. Mesmo alguns
especialistas israelenses concordam, incluindo o chefe de arqueologia na
Universidade de Tel Aviv. Prof. Ze'ev Herzog, em um artigo de 1999 no Ha'aretz,
disse:

"Os israelitas nunca estavam no Egito, não caminhar no deserto, não


conquistaram a terra em uma campanha militar e não passá-lo para as
12 tribos de Israel."
A Travessia do Mar Vermelho ROSSELLI (1439 - 1507)

[LD: O Velho Testamento nos diz que Deus ajudou a separar as ondas
do Mar Vermelho, permitindo que o seu povo escolhido para
atravessar milagrosamente para o outro lado enquanto fugiam do
exército de Faraó perseguindo. Assim que o exército egípcio desceu
na mesma trincheira, Deus permitiu que as ondas de voltar em um
enorme muro que desaba sobre as cabeças dos maus egípcios que
estavam todos se afogaram.

Titbit divertido. "peões Mar Vermelho" = eufemismo politicamente


incorreto do Monty Python para "judeus". [LD]
§

Escusado será dizer que esta revelação tem profundas implicações para todas
as principais religiões monoteístas do mundo: o judaísmo, o cristianismo eo
islamismo, que toda a base da sua legitimidade profundamente falho sobre
essas lendas questionáveis do Antigo Testamento.

Para Dr. Ezzat, a desentocar da verdadeira história dos judeus é uma questão
de defender a reputação de seu ilustre terra natal, a mais antiga conhecida
civilização humana, a misteriosa terra das pirâmides e da Esfinge. Ezzat visa
simplesmente para descobrir a verdade enterrada debaixo de dois mil anos de
deturpação deliberada e caluniosa de uma cultura que forneceu a base das
religiões monoteístas que "emprestados" fortemente a tradição egípcia, mas
esqueceu de mencionar a fonte, alegando estas bem conhecidas rituais como
seus próprios.

Ezzat tem trabalhado nessa tarefa por


vários anos em seu website
Pyramidion , mas agora deu um grande
passo em frente com a publicação de "O
Egito não conheceu Pharaohs Nem
israelitas" ( na foto ). O livro está
disponível em uma edição Kindle por
meros US $ 5 e contém grande
quantidade de links ao vivo muito
valiosos, incluindo a famosa "Dawn of
Conscience" de Breasted ensaio e
instrutivo material de fundo do escritor
romano Plutarco, egiptólogo Donald
Redford e repórter contemporâneo Juan
Cole usando arquivista os dados de fundo enciclopédicas Peter Myers.

O livro é um verdadeiro tesouro da história bíblica objetiva, um contrapeso


essencial para a superabundância de material de proselitismo religioso não
confiável que as prejudicam estudiosos históricas objetivas em todos os
lugares com desinformação auto-absorvida.

Defender a tradição honrosa do Egito

Muitos fatores definir Ezzat nesta fuga detetive da decepção bíblica que castiga
o Egito Antigo como uma sociedade de manutenção de escravo imoral.

A primeira pista foi a de que o Antigo Testamento nunca mencionou as


pirâmides, fazendo com que os escritores desse documento a primeira
e, provavelmente, os únicos visitantes do Egito, que nunca mencionou
estas estruturas imponentes.

A alegação de Ezzat, apoiado por estudos empíricos sólidos, é que os


acontecimentos do Antigo Testamento ocorreu no sudoeste da Arábia, em uma
província chamada Mizraim, ou Misr, uma localização agora próximo dia
moderno Iêmen, que é onde ele diz que a tribo de Israel foi realmente nascido.

A segunda tipoff era o terreno, que no OT mais se assemelha montanhosa


Saudita, em vez de plano Egito. Além disso, a Bíblia narra as secas, que o Egito
nunca tiveram, somente as flutuações no inundações do Nilo. Muitos dos
eventos atribuídos à área da atual Palestina realmente ocorreu muito mais ao
sul ao longo da costa do Mar Vermelho, Ezzat insiste. Além disso, um detalhe
ainda mais revelador da história Joseph foi a caravana de camelos
transportando "Goma, bálsamo e mirra", que eram produtos do comércio
árabe, e não do Egito.

A terceira e mais reveladora pista foi a noção de escravidão, que


reivindicações Ezzat nunca foi praticada no Egito até os gregos e
persas trouxe a prática com eles mil anos mais tarde do que o suposto
tempo de Moisés e José.

Algumas histórias indicar as pirâmides foram construídas por escravos, mas a


história mostra-nos os construtores das pirâmides eram voluntários
dispostos,como a vila dos construtores das pirâmides atesta .

E o quarto aspecto desta fraude milenar Antigo Testamento era o rótulo de


faraó, que nenhum documento egípcio nunca usa. Mas o líder da tribo Mizraim
foi chamado Faraon, que fez a mudança do hebraico para o grego e para a
criação de um faraó vilão muitos séculos depois um truque fácil de retirar.
Egito, um dos mais bem documentados de todas as civilizações antigas, nunca
uma vez usou o termo faraó.

Este é realmente um conto de dois Egypts: Egito foi mencionado na Bíblia em


torno de 700 vezes; os israelitas não foram mencionados uma vez nos registros
egípcios.

O historiador do século 5 aC Heródoto, vulgarmente conhecido como "o pai da


história", nunca mencionou faraós, só os reis. Heródoto também nunca
mencionou Israel, repetidamente mencionado Palestina, Síria e os fenícios,
nunca mencionou judeus ou cananeus, e nunca mencionou qualquer templo
sagrado judaico.

Mas mais do que qualquer outra coisa, que era o insulto à filosofia religiosa
extremamente iluminada do Egito Antigo - práticas morais que nunca foi
igualado pelas civilizações que vieram depois - que obrigaram Ezzat para
defender a honra de uma cultura notável que sobreviveu durante a maior parte
do três milênios, mais tempo - você faz tomar nota - do que qualquer outra
cultura na história do mundo.

"Enganosamente que liga a história de Moisés e seu Faraó manchou a imagem


de uma das maiores civilizações da humanidade", escreve Ezzat. "Antigo Egito
foi apunhalado no coração por este dois mil anos duplicidade. E esse engano é
provável que continue, se não expor a verdade sobre as histórias de Israel e
sua origem árabe e da fraude Septuaginta. "
"
Antigo Egito foi esfaqueado nas costas por uma duplicidade de dois mil anos!"
Tradutores judeus corruptos

No século 2 aC, o hebraico Bíblia foi traduzida do aramaico para o grego no


lendário Biblioteca de Alexandria. Setenta escribas judeus, daí a designação da
Bíblia Septuaginta, foram distribuídos nesta tarefa pelo Ptolomeus em que
astuciosamente substituiu este obscuro líder tribal Faraon com o poderoso
Egito e seu rei. A versão grega, com essa distorção maliciosa da história antiga,
tem sido a fonte de todas as traduções da Bíblia em todo o mundo desde
então.

A decepção Septaguint tinha sido o resultado de um vínculo greco-judaica


muito semelhante ao hoje em dia "um americano-israelense. (Controlar e
manipular superpotências do mundo - antigo e moderno - é obviamente uma
proficiência judaica velho também demonstrável no antigo arranjo judaico /
persa que levou à libertação de cativeiro babilônico e da cumplicidade com o
Império Romano para controlar e conter o cristianismo.)

Substituindo a cidade árabe de Mizraim / Misr com Egito faraônico nas histórias
dos Patriarcas não só distorceu as histórias de Israel, mas a historiografia do
conjunto antigo Oriente Próximo.

Os perigos esta deturpação apresenta para os tempos modernos são


numerosos.

Número um, os egípcios modernos foram destacados de sua própria cultura.

Número dois, as mentiras apresentadas na Bíblia que têm filtrados em outras


religiões representam um perigo violento com base em informações erradas.

Por exemplo, os salafistas, endurecido islamistas e jihadistas, querem demolir


todos monumento e templos do antigo Egito, incluindo as pirâmides e da
Esfinge, porque acreditam que estes são os ídolos adorados Faraó, rejeitando a
verdadeira palavra de Deus entregou por Moisés.

Então aqui vai uma trama de assassinato em massa de mente fechada


baseado no conto de fadas de escravos judeus construção das pirâmides

O conto Exodus é de cerca de escravos, trabalhando em 400 anos de


escravidão contínua. O fracasso de seus irmãos para assassinar Joseph é
contada tanto no Alcorão e da Bíblia. Os irmãos o venderam aos ismaelitas, e
não os egípcios, por 20 moedas de prata (Gênesis 37: 26-28).

A decepção Septaguint repetido através cinema contemporâneo foi evidente


no recente filme de Ridley Scott Êxodo (que fracassou na bilheteria!): Deuses e
Reis.

Egito proibiu este filme por sua "visão sionista da história". O mesmo golpe
perpetrado pelos judeus por 3000 anos - mudar a história para enganar o
público - ainda está sendo executado hoje em Hollywood.

Embora Êxodo: Gods and Kings é definido no Egito, você não vai realmente ser
capaz de vê-lo ali. Segundo a revista Deadline (e relatado por Ezzat),
adaptação de Scott da história bíblica de Moisés entrar em conflito com os
censores egípcias. Abdul Sattar Fathi, o chefe do conselho de censura estatal
egípcia, criticou duramente o filme, citando "erros históricos" como
reivindicando os judeus construíram as pirâmides e retratar Moisés como um
general, não um profeta.

"Além disso", disse Fathi, "isso mostra antigos egípcios como um grupo mob
perseguir judeus pacíficos. Nosso conselho recusou-se isso por respeito pelos
sentimentos dos egípcios. "

(Judeus pacíficas, eu gosto disso. Poderia ser o único exemplo na história dos
judeus pacíficos. Nenhuma surpresa que só Hollywood poderia vir com um
conceito como judeus pacíficos, o que é certamente um tipo de ser humano
que nunca antes visto na história. Vá dizer aos palestinos sobre judeus
pacíficos.)

Diz Ezzat, que continua a ser escrupulosamente imparcial quando se trata de


política contemporânea, o Egito não é simplesmente onde esta história
aconteceu.

Na época, Israel não estava lá

Judeus mentir. Quantos exemplos moderno que você precisa? Seis milhões de
mortos em um Holocausto que nunca aconteceu? Pessoas de todo o mundo
pagando reparações por crimes que não cometeram e que estão sendo jogados
na prisão quando eles pedem para a prova desses crimes. A comida veneno
empresa judaica produção e um governo judeu forçando as pessoas a comê-
lo.Judeus assassinando milhares de camponeses desarmados e chamando-o de
auto-defesa, desencadeando guerras em todo o mundo através da
manipulação secreta dos governos tenha comprado.

Atual rouser ralé israelense Binyamin Netanyahu disse recentemente em um


discurso que o povo judeu estava construindo Jerusalém 3.000 anos atrás. No
entanto, outra mentira judaica.

Ezzat diz que não.


"O povo judeu não estavam construindo Jerusalém 3.000 anos atrás,
ou seja, de 1000 aC. . . Não houve invasão da Palestina geográfica do
Egito por ex-escravos no BCE 2200s. . . A crônica de eventos do
reinado de Ramsés II na parede em Luxor não sabe sobre qualquer um
dos principais resultados de escravos ou voos por mesmo na
península do Sinai. Fontes egípcias nunca ouvi falar de Moisés ou as
12 pragas ".

Jerusalém não só não estava sendo construída pelos prováveis então


inexistentes "povo judeu", em 1000 aC, mas Jerusalém provavelmente nem
sequer foi habitada naquele ponto da história. Jerusalém parece ter sido
abandonada entre 1000 aC e 900 aC, as datas tradicionais para o reino unido
sob Davi e Salomão.

Então Jerusalém não era "a cidade de David, 'já que não havia nenhuma cidade
lá quando ele disse ter vivido lá. Nenhum sinal de magníficos palácios ou
grandes estados foi encontrado na arqueologia desse período, e os
comprimidos assírios, que registrou até mesmo eventos menores em todo o
Oriente Médio, como as ações de rainhas árabes, não sei nada sobre qualquer
grande reino de Davi e Salomão na Palestina geográfica.

Não é uma coisa.

Palestina não era a terra natal para o reino de Israel e as histórias de seus
primeiros patriarcas. O início do judaísmo e as histórias de Abraão, Isaac, José e
Moisés aconteceu em Saudita e Iêmen, Ezzat escreve. A falha gritante da
arqueologia bíblica, na terra da Palestina é principalmente devido a uma
premissa completamente falho e uma Bíblia (Septaguint) astuciosamente
adulterado (pelos mesmos arrepios malignos que manipulam nossas notícias e
materiais educativos hoje).

Registros escritos do Egito datam de 1870 aC. Nenhum vestígio dos


israelitas.

A escravidão era uma tradição comum na Arábia, mas não no Egito. A


escravidão não veio para o Egito "até o dia 7 de século 4 aC, com a influência
dos persas / invasões gregas."

Esta tradição de escravidão persiste no Iêmen, onde os estrangeiros não estão


autorizados a conseguir um emprego sem o patrocínio de um nativo chamado
de Kafeel que controlam todos os aspectos de suas vidas.

Em sua teoria revolucionária "Bíblia veio da Arábia" Dr. Kamal Salibi descobriu
mais de uma centena de nomes de lugares em Saudita e Iêmen do Norte, que
surpreendentemente combinava os mencionados na Torá, Ezzat escreve.

"Colocar os israelitas de volta em sua terra nativa árabe deixará de fazer o


futuro pervasive da escravidão nas histórias de José e Moisés alienígena ou
inexplicável, ou os muros e fortificações de aldeias montanhosas tombado pelo
Joshua irreal e não verificável.

"A terra Josué conquistou foi um pequeno território no norte do Iêmen. O Egito
da Bíblia não é o Egito do Vale do Nilo, mas uma pequena cidade obscura no
deserto do sudoeste da Arábia antiga chamado Mizraim, ou Misr em hebraico e
árabe.

"O êxodo ocorreu de uma forma muito mais humilde e em uma escala muito
mais estreito em uma pequena aldeia obscura na antiga Arábia do Sul",
escreve Ezzat.

"Se o Egito não conhecia faraós, então não é preciso dizer que o Egito nunca
soube Moisés, também. E se Moisés nunca pôs os pés no Egito, em seguida,
roteiro do Exodus 'para a Terra Prometida tem que ser redesenhado. "

A concepção de harmonia mundial

As mentiras começou há muito tempo. De acordo com o Antigo Testamento,


escritos por judeus, antigo Egito é a terra da idolatria, da tirania e da
escravidão.

É essa calúnia em que Ezzat cerdas, porque os preceitos da religião do antigo


Egito foram plagiados por seus sucessores cristãos e muçulmanos, Trapaças e
barril.

"Maat é o conceito egípcio de harmonia mundial baseada na justiça, equilíbrio


e verdade. Maat, ou a senhora da verdade, personificada pelos antigos egípcios
na forma de uma senhora que veste a pena da verdade em sua cabeça e
segurando a balança da justiça, é o código de ética pelo qual todos os egípcios,
incluindo monarcas, deve seguir, "Ezzat escreve.

O falecido Prof. Breasted, em uma bela introdução de seu clássico 1933 Dawn
of Conscience , escreve em um link ao vivo a partir do livro:

"Os egípcios possuíam um padrão de moral muito superior à do


Decálogo (os Dez Mandamentos) mais de mil anos antes de o
Decálogo foi escrito."
Famoso egiptólogo Professor James Henry Breasted
em seu escritório no Instituto Oriental de 1929
Então Ezzat não está fazendo essas coisas para cima. Breasted é um
dos historiadores mais respeitados de todos os tempos. E a insistência
de Ezzat que grande parte do material no Antigo Testamento é
fabricado, distorcida e plagiado é verdade.

Por exemplo, a sabedoria de Amenemope, preservada em um papiro egípcio no


Museu Britânico, foi traduzido para o hebraico em tempos antigos e, circulando
na Palestina, foi a fonte para uma seção inteira do Testamento velho livro de
Provérbios.

"Nossa herança moral deriva de um passado humano mais amplo


enormemente mais velho do que os hebreus, e chegou até nós, em vez através
dos hebreus do que com eles. O homem levantou-se para alta visão moral dois
mil anos antes da nação hebraica nasceu ", escreve Ezzat.

Assim como nos tempos modernos, quando, na Segunda Guerra Mundial, a


Alemanha foi apresentado como o cara mau, enquanto os países judaicas os
EUA, Grã-Bretanha e União Soviética foram apresentados como os mocinhos,
os hebreus apresentado interlopers israelitas como os bravos heróis e egípcios
inocentes como o vilões, que, como a justaposição de assassinos israelenses e
palestinos vítimas em lutadores da liberdade judeus e terroristas islâmicos é
uma injustiça histórica e mentira imperdoável do tipo que assim debilita nossa
existência hoje.

Judeus mentir. Eles sempre têm, e eles sempre será.

FONTE: http://www.darkmoon.me/2015/the-first-jewish-lie-the-old-
testament-fabrication-that-the-israelites-were-slaves-in-egypt/

DA FONTE ORIGINAL

The First Jewish Lie: The Old Testament


fabrication that the Israelites were slaves in
Egypt — John Kaminski
John Kaminski Other Writers, Recommended Reading
It seems that Jews have lied about their history in the Old Testament. Overwhelming new
evidence by top Egyptian and Israeli scholars shows that Jews were never slaves in Egypt.

Pictures and captions by Darkmoon


If the Jews had been living in Egypt for centuries as slaves,
surely they would have noticed the pyramids and the Sphinx?
Strangely, neither of these great architectural wonders of the world
are mentioned even once in the Old Testament!
Jews lie. Jews have always lied. And most assuredly, Jews are still lying today about everything
that has to do with themselves and their sordid history.
So considering how they have wrecked the United States, Russia, Germany and so many other
countries by mentally lobotomizing and financially castrating all of them, it should come as no
surprise that Jews have falsified their own history from the very beginning.
Or to put it more concisely in the words of an Egyptian medical doctor named Ashraf Ezzat:
“The truth is that ancient Egypt never knew any Pharaohs nor any Israelites.
Egypt was never the land of Exodus and Palestine was never the Promised Land.”

Backed by every reputable expert in the known world, Ezzat argues that ancient Hebrew history as
we know it today is based on one colossal lie — that events described as happening in Egypt, if they
happened at all, really happened in Arabia. Which means that according to his version, the tales of
Joseph, Moses and the Exodus might still be true, but the location in which they are alleged to have
happened are false.
To the average person, this would seem a farfetched assertion were it not for the supportive
testimony of the world’s top Egyptologists, from James Henry Breasted to Donald Redford to Israel
Finkelstein. Even some Israeli experts agree, including the head of archeology at Tel Aviv
University. Prof. Ze’ev Herzog, in a 1999 article in Ha’aretz, said:
“The Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer
the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel.”
The Crossing of the Red Sea ROSSELLI (1439 – 1507)

[LD: The Old Testament tells us that God helped to part the waves of the Red Sea, allowing
his Chosen People to cross over miraculously to the other side as they fled from Pharaoh’s
pursuing army. As soon as the Egyptian army descended into the same trench, God let the
waves return in a huge collapsing wall onto the heads of the evil Egyptians who were all
drowned.

Amusing titbit. “Red Sea pedestrians” = Monty Python’s politically incorrect euphemism for
“Jews”. [LD]
§
Needless to say, this revelation has profound implications for all of the world’s major monotheistic
religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam, which all base their deeply flawed legitimacy on these
questionable Old Testament legends.
For Dr. Ezzat, the ferreting out of the real story of the Jews is a matter of defending the reputation
of his illustrious homeland, the oldest known human civilization, the mysterious land of the
pyramids and the Sphinx. Ezzat seeks merely to uncover the truth buried beneath two thousand
years of deliberate and slanderous misrepresentation of a culture that provided the foundation of the
monotheistic religions which have “borrowed” heavily from Egyptian tradition but neglected to
mention the source as they claimed these well-known rituals as their own.
Ezzat has labored at this task for several years on his Pyramidion website, but now has taken a big
step forward with the publication of “Egypt Knew No Pharaohs Nor Israelites” (pictured). The book
is available in a Kindle edition for a mere $5 and contains lots of very valuable live links, including
Breasted’s famous “Dawn of Conscience” essay and instructive background material from the
Roman writer Plutarch, Egyptologist Donald Redford and contemporary reporter Juan Cole using
archivist Peter Myers’ encyclopedic background data.
The book is a real treasure trove of objective Biblical history, an essential counterweight to the
overabundance of unreliable religious proselytization material that handicaps objective historical
scholars everywhere with self-absorbed misinformation.
Defending Egypt’s honorable tradition
Many factors set Ezzat on this detective trail of the Biblical deception that castigates Ancient Egypt
as an immoral, slave-keeping society.
The first clue was that the Old Testament never mentioned the pyramids, making
the writers of that document the first and probably the only visitors to Egypt who
never mentioned these awe-inspiring structures.

Ezzat’s contention, backed by solid empirical scholarship, is that the events of the Old Testament
occurred in southwestern Arabia, in a province called Mizraim, or Misr, a location now near modern
day Yemen, which is where he says the tribe of Israel was really born.
The second tipoff was the terrain, which in the OT more resembles hilly Arabia rather than flat
Egypt. Also, the Bible recounts droughts, which Egypt never had, only fluctuations in the flooding
of the Nile. Many of the events ascribed to the area of present day Palestine actually occurred much
further south down the coast of the Red Sea, Ezzat insists. Furthermore an even more telling detail
in the Joseph story was the camel caravan carrying “gum, balm and myrrh”, which were products of
Arabian trade, not Egypt’s.
The third and most revealing clue was the notion of slavery, which Ezzat claims
was never practiced in Egypt until the Greeks and Persians brought the practice
with them a thousand years later than the supposed time of Moses and Joseph.

Some stories state the pyramids were built by slaves, but history shows us the pyramid builders
were willing volunteers, as the village of the pyramid builders attests.
And the fourth aspect of this millennia-old Old Testament fraud was the label of pharaoh, which no
Egyptian document ever uses. But the leader of the Mizraim tribe was called Faraon, which made
the switch from Hebrew to Greek and the creation of a villainous pharaoh many centuries later an
easy trick to pull off. Egypt, one of the best documented of all ancient civilizations, never once used
the term pharaoh.
This is truly a tale of two Egypts: Egypt was mentioned in the Bible around 700 times; the Israelites
were not mentioned once in the Egyptian records.
The 5th century BC historian Herodotus, commonly known as “the father of history”, never
mentioned pharaohs, only kings. Herodotus also never mentioned Israel, repeatedly mentioned
Palestine, Syria and the Phoenicians, never mentioned Jews or Canaanites, and never mentioned any
Jewish holy temple.
But more than anything else, it was the insult to Ancient Egypt’s extremely enlightened religious
philosophy — moral practices that have never been equalled by the civilizations that came later —
that compelled Ezzat to defend the honor of a remarkable culture that survived for the better part of
three millennia, longer – you make take note — than any other culture in world history.
“Deceitfully linking the story of Moses and his Pharaoh has tarnished the image of one of
humanity’s greatest civilizations,” Ezzat writes. “Ancient Egypt has been stabbed in the heart by
this two-thousand year duplicity. And this deception is likely to continue if we don’t expose the
truth about the Israelite stories and their Arabic origin and the Septuagint fraud.”

“Ancient Egypt has been stabbed in the back by a two-thousand year duplicity!”
Corrupt Jewish translators
In the 2nd century BC, the Hebrew bible was translated from Aramaic to Greek at the legendary
Library of Alexandria. Seventy Jewish scribes, hence the designation of the Septuagint Bible, were
assigned this task by the Ptolemies in which they cunningly replaced this obscure tribal leader
Faraon with the mighty Egypt and its king. The Greek version, with this malicious distortion of
ancient history, has been the source for all translations of the Bible worldwide ever since.
The Septaguint deception had been the result of a Greek-Jewish bond very similar to nowadays’
American-Israeli one. (Controlling and manipulating world superpowers — ancient and modern —
is obviously an old Jewish proficiency also demonstrable in the old Jewish/Persian arrangement that
led to the release from Babylonian Captivity and the complicity with the Roman Empire to control
and contain Christianity.)
Replacing the Arabic town of Mizraim/Misr with pharaonic Egypt in the stories of the Patriarchs
has not only distorted the Israelite stories but the historiography of the whole ancient Near East.
The dangers this misrepresentation presents to modern times are numerous.
Number one, modern Egyptians have been detached from their own culture.
Number two, the lies presented in the Bible that have filtered into other religions present a violent
danger based on mistaken information.
For instance, the Salafis, hardened Islamists and jihadists, want to demolish all of ancient Egypt’s
monument and temples, including the Pyramids and the Sphinx, because they believe these are the
idols Pharaoh worshipped while rejecting the true word of God delivered by Moses.
So here is a closed-minded mass murder plot based on the fairy tale of Jewish slaves building the
Pyramids
The Exodus tale is about slaves, toiling in 400 years of continuous bondage. The failure of his
brothers to murder Joseph is told both in the Qu’ran and the Bible. The brothers sold him to the
Ishmaelites, not the Egyptians, for 20 shekels of silver (Genesis 37:26-28).
The Septaguint deception repeated through contemporary filmmaking was evident in the recent
Ridley Scott film (which flopped at the box office!) Exodus: Gods and Kings.
Egypt banned this movie for its “Zionist view of history”. The same scam perpetrated by the Jews
for 3000 years — changing history to dupe the public — is still being run today in Hollywood.
Although Exodus: Gods and Kings is set in Egypt, you won’t actually be able to see it there.
According to Deadline magazine (and reported by Ezzat), Scott’s adaptation of the biblical story of
Moses has run afoul of Egyptian censors. Abdul Sattar Fathi, the head of the Egyptian state
censorship board, harshly criticized the film, citing “historical mistakes” such as claiming the Jews
built the pyramids and portraying Moses as a general, not a prophet.
“Furthermore,” Fathi said, “it shows ancient Egyptians as a mob group persecuting peaceful Jews.
Our board has refused this out of respect for Egyptians’ feelings.”
(Peaceful Jews, I like that. Could be the only example in history of peaceful Jews. No surprise that
only Hollywood could come with a concept like peaceful Jews, which is surely a type of human
being that has never before been seen in history. Go tell the Palestinians about peaceful Jews.)
Says Ezzat, who remains scrupulously impartial when it comes to contemporary politics, Egypt is
simply not where this story took place.
At the time, Israel wasn’t there
Jews lie. How many modern examples do you need? Six million dead in a Holocaust that never
happened? People all over the world paying reparations for crimes they didn’t commit and being
thrown in jail when they ask for proof of these crimes. A Jewish company producing poison food
and a Jewish government forcing people to eat it. Jews murdering thousands of unarmed peasants
and calling it self defense, triggering wars all over the world through covert manipulation of
governments it has bought.
Current Israeli rabble rouser Binyamin Netanyahu said recently in a speech that the Jewish people
were building Jerusalem 3000 years ago. Yet another Jewish lie.
Ezzat says no.
“The Jewish people were not building Jerusalem 3000 years ago, i.e. 1000 BC . . .
There was no invasion of geographical Palestine from Egypt by former slaves in
the 2200s BCE . . . The chronicle of events of the reign of Ramses II on the wall in
Luxor does not know about any major slave results or flights by same into the
Sinai peninsula. Egyptian sources never heard of Moses or the 12 plagues.”

Jerusalem not only was not being built by the likely then non-existent “Jewish people” in 1000
BCE, but Jerusalem probably was not even inhabited at that point in history. Jerusalem appears to
have been abandoned between 1000 BCE and 900 BCE, the traditional dates for the united kingdom
under David and Solomon.
So Jerusalem was not ‘the city of David,’ since there was no city there when he is said to have lived
there. No sign of magnificent palaces or great states has been found in the archeology of this period,
and the Assyrian tablets, which recorded even minor events throughout the Middle East, such as the
actions of Arab queens, don’t know anything about any great kingdom of David and Solomon in
geographical Palestine.
Not a thing.
Palestine was not the homeland for the kingdom of Israel and the stories of its early patriarchs. The
inception of Judaism and the stories of Abraham, Isaac, Joseph and Moses happened in Arabia and
Yemen, Ezzat writes. The blatant failure of Biblical archeology in the land of Palestine is primarily
due to a premise completely flawed and a Bible (Septaguint) cunningly tampered with (by the same
evil creeps who manipulate our news and educational materials today).
Egypt’s written records date back to 1870 BC. No trace of the Israelites.

Slavery was a common tradition in Arabia but not in Egypt. Slavery didn’t come to Egypt “until 7th
to 4th century BC, with the influence of the Persian/Greek invasions.”
This tradition of slavery lingers on in Yemen, where foreigners aren’t allowed to get a job without
the sponsorship of a native called a kafeel who control all aspects of their lives.
In his breakthrough theory “Bible Came from Arabia” Dr. Kamal Salibi has discovered more than
one hundred place names in Arabia and North Yemen that amazingly matched the ones mentioned
in the Torah, Ezzat writes.
“Placing the Israelites back in their native Arabic land will no longer make the pervasive future of
slavery in the stories of Joseph and Moses alien or inexplicable, or the walls and fortifications of
mountainous villages tumbled by Joshua unreal and unverifiable.
“The land Joshua conquered was a small territory in North Yemen. The Egypt of the Bible is not the
Egypt of the NIle Valley but an obscure little town in the southwestern desert of ancient Arabia
called Mizraim, or Misr in Hebrew and Arabic.
“The Exodus took place in a much humbler way and on a much narrower scale in an obscure little
village in ancient South Arabia,” Ezzat writes.
“If Egypt knew no Pharaohs, then it goes without saying that Egypt never knew Moses, either. And
if Moses never set foot in Egypt, then the Exodus’ road map into the Promised Land has to be
redrawn.”
A conception of world harmony
The lies began a long time ago. According to the Old Testament, written by Jews, ancient Egypt is
the land of idolatry, tyranny and slavery.
It is this slander at which Ezzat bristles, because the precepts of the ancient Egyptian religion were
plagiarized by its Christian and Muslim successors lock, stock and barrel.
“Maat is the Egyptian concept of world harmony based on justice, balance and truth. Maat, or the
lady of truth, as personified by ancient Egyptians in the shape of a lady wearing the feather of truth
on her head and holding the balance of justice, is the code of ethics by which all Egyptians,
including monarchs, should follow,” Ezzat writes.
The late Prof. Breasted, in a beautiful introduction to his 1933 classic Dawn of Conscience, writes
in a live link from the book:
“The Egyptians possessed a standard of morals far superior to that of the
Decalogue (the Ten Commandments) over a thousand years before the Decalogue
was written.”
Famous Egyptologist Professor James Henry Breasted
in his office at the Oriental Institute, 1929
So Ezzat is not making this stuff up. Breasted is one of the most respected historians ever. And
Ezzat’s insistence that much of the material in the Old Testament is fabricated, distorted and
plagiarized is true.
For instance, the wisdom of Amenemope, preserved in an Egyptian papyrus in the British Museum,
was translated into Hebrew in ancient times and, circulating in Palestine, was the source for a whole
section of the Old Testament Book of Proverbs.
“Our moral heritage derives from a wider human past enormously older than the Hebrews, and it
has come to us rather through the Hebrews than from them. Man arose to high moral vision two
thousand years before the Hebrew nation was born,” Ezzat writes.
Just like in modern times, when in World War II Germany was presented as the bad guy while the
Jewish countries the U.S., Britain and Soviet Union were presented as the good guys, the Hebrews
presented Israelite interlopers as the brave heroes and innocent Egyptians as the villains, which like
the juxtaposition of Israeli murderers and Palestinian victims into Jew freedom fighters and Islamic
terrorists is a historical injustice and unforgivable lie of the type that so debilitates our existence
today.
Jews lie. They always have, and they always will.
It seems that Jews have lied about their history in the Old Testament.
Overwhelming new evidence by top Egyptian and Israeli scholars shows that
Jews were never slaves in Egypt.
Pictures and captions by Darkmoon

If the Jews had been living in Egypt for centuries as slaves,


surely they would have noticed the pyramids and the Sphinx?
Strangely, neither of these great architectural wonders of the world
are mentioned even once in the Old Testament!
Jews lie. Jews have always lied. And most assuredly, Jews are still lying today about everything
that has to do with themselves and their sordid history.
So considering how they have wrecked the United States, Russia, Germany and so many other
countries by mentally lobotomizing and financially castrating all of them, it should come as no
surprise that Jews have falsified their own history from the very beginning.
Or to put it more concisely in the words of an Egyptian medical doctor named Ashraf Ezzat:
“The truth is that ancient Egypt never knew any Pharaohs nor any Israelites.
Egypt was never the land of Exodus and Palestine was never the Promised Land.”

Backed by every reputable expert in the known world, Ezzat argues that ancient Hebrew history as
we know it today is based on one colossal lie — that events described as happening in Egypt, if they
happened at all, really happened in Arabia. Which means that according to his version, the tales of
Joseph, Moses and the Exodus might still be true, but the location in which they are alleged to have
happened are false.
To the average person, this would seem a farfetched assertion were it not for the supportive
testimony of the world’s top Egyptologists, from James Henry Breasted to Donald Redford to Israel
Finkelstein. Even some Israeli experts agree, including the head of archeology at Tel Aviv
University. Prof. Ze’ev Herzog, in a 1999 article in Ha’aretz, said:
“The Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer
the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel.”

The Crossing of the Red Sea ROSSELLI (1439 – 1507)

[LD: The Old Testament tells us that God helped to part the waves of the Red Sea, allowing
his Chosen People to cross over miraculously to the other side as they fled from Pharaoh’s
pursuing army. As soon as the Egyptian army descended into the same trench, God let the
waves return in a huge collapsing wall onto the heads of the evil Egyptians who were all
drowned.

Amusing titbit. “Red Sea pedestrians” = Monty Python’s politically incorrect euphemism for
“Jews”. [LD]
§
Needless to say, this revelation has profound implications for all of the world’s major monotheistic
religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam, which all base their deeply flawed legitimacy on these
questionable Old Testament legends.
For Dr. Ezzat, the ferreting out of the real story of the Jews is a matter of defending the reputation
of his illustrious homeland, the oldest known human civilization, the mysterious land of the
pyramids and the Sphinx. Ezzat seeks merely to uncover the truth buried beneath two thousand
years of deliberate and slanderous misrepresentation of a culture that provided the foundation of the
monotheistic religions which have “borrowed” heavily from Egyptian tradition but neglected to
mention the source as they claimed these well-known rituals as their own.

Ezzat has labored at this task for several years on his


Pyramidion website, but now has taken a big step forward with the publication of “Egypt Knew
No Pharaohs Nor Israelites” (pictured). The book is available in a Kindle edition for a mere $5 and
contains lots of very valuable live links, including Breasted’s famous “Dawn of Conscience” essay
and instructive background material from the Roman writer Plutarch, Egyptologist Donald Redford
and contemporary reporter Juan Cole using archivist Peter Myers’ encyclopedic background data.
The book is a real treasure trove of objective Biblical history, an essential counterweight to the
overabundance of unreliable religious proselytization material that handicaps objective historical
scholars everywhere with self-absorbed misinformation.
Defending Egypt’s honorable tradition
Many factors set Ezzat on this detective trail of the Biblical deception that castigates Ancient Egypt
as an immoral, slave-keeping society.
The first clue was that the Old Testament never mentioned the pyramids, making
the writers of that document the first and probably the only visitors to Egypt who
never mentioned these awe-inspiring structures.

Ezzat’s contention, backed by solid empirical scholarship, is that the events of the Old Testament
occurred in southwestern Arabia, in a province called Mizraim, or Misr, a location now near modern
day Yemen, which is where he says the tribe of Israel was really born.
The second tipoff was the terrain, which in the OT more resembles hilly Arabia rather than flat
Egypt. Also, the Bible recounts droughts, which Egypt never had, only fluctuations in the flooding
of the Nile. Many of the events ascribed to the area of present day Palestine actually occurred much
further south down the coast of the Red Sea, Ezzat insists. Furthermore an even more telling detail
in the Joseph story was the camel caravan carrying “gum, balm and myrrh”, which were products of
Arabian trade, not Egypt’s.
The third and most revealing clue was the notion of slavery, which Ezzat claims
was never practiced in Egypt until the Greeks and Persians brought the practice
with them a thousand years later than the supposed time of Moses and Joseph.

Some stories state the pyramids were built by slaves, but history shows us the pyramid builders
were willing volunteers, as the village of the pyramid builders attests.
And the fourth aspect of this millennia-old Old Testament fraud was the label of pharaoh, which no
Egyptian document ever uses. But the leader of the Mizraim tribe was called Faraon, which made
the switch from Hebrew to Greek and the creation of a villainous pharaoh many centuries later an
easy trick to pull off. Egypt, one of the best documented of all ancient civilizations, never once used
the term pharaoh.
This is truly a tale of two Egypts: Egypt was mentioned in the Bible around 700 times; the Israelites
were not mentioned once in the Egyptian records.
The 5th century BC historian Herodotus, commonly known as “the father of history”, never
mentioned pharaohs, only kings. Herodotus also never mentioned Israel, repeatedly mentioned
Palestine, Syria and the Phoenicians, never mentioned Jews or Canaanites, and never mentioned any
Jewish holy temple.
But more than anything else, it was the insult to Ancient Egypt’s extremely enlightened religious
philosophy — moral practices that have never been equalled by the civilizations that came later —
that compelled Ezzat to defend the honor of a remarkable culture that survived for the better part of
three millennia, longer – you make take note — than any other culture in world history.
“Deceitfully linking the story of Moses and his Pharaoh has tarnished the image of one of
humanity’s greatest civilizations,” Ezzat writes. “Ancient Egypt has been stabbed in the heart by
this two-thousand year duplicity. And this deception is likely to continue if we don’t expose the
truth about the Israelite stories and their Arabic origin and the Septuagint fraud.”

“Ancient Egypt has been stabbed in the back by a two-thousand year duplicity!”
Corrupt Jewish translators
In the 2nd century BC, the Hebrew bible was translated from Aramaic to Greek at the legendary
Library of Alexandria. Seventy Jewish scribes, hence the designation of the Septuagint Bible, were
assigned this task by the Ptolemies in which they cunningly replaced this obscure tribal leader
Faraon with the mighty Egypt and its king. The Greek version, with this malicious distortion of
ancient history, has been the source for all translations of the Bible worldwide ever since.
The Septaguint deception had been the result of a Greek-Jewish bond very similar to nowadays’
American-Israeli one. (Controlling and manipulating world superpowers — ancient and modern —
is obviously an old Jewish proficiency also demonstrable in the old Jewish/Persian arrangement that
led to the release from Babylonian Captivity and the complicity with the Roman Empire to control
and contain Christianity.)
Replacing the Arabic town of Mizraim/Misr with pharaonic Egypt in the stories of the Patriarchs
has not only distorted the Israelite stories but the historiography of the whole ancient Near East.
The dangers this misrepresentation presents to modern times are numerous.
Number one, modern Egyptians have been detached from their own culture.
Number two, the lies presented in the Bible that have filtered into other religions present a violent
danger based on mistaken information.
For instance, the Salafis, hardened Islamists and jihadists, want to demolish all of ancient Egypt’s
monument and temples, including the Pyramids and the Sphinx, because they believe these are the
idols Pharaoh worshipped while rejecting the true word of God delivered by Moses.
So here is a closed-minded mass murder plot based on the fairy tale of Jewish slaves building the
Pyramids
The Exodus tale is about slaves, toiling in 400 years of continuous bondage. The failure of his
brothers to murder Joseph is told both in the Qu’ran and the Bible. The brothers sold him to the
Ishmaelites, not the Egyptians, for 20 shekels of silver (Genesis 37:26-28).
The Septaguint deception repeated through contemporary filmmaking was evident in the recent
Ridley Scott film (which flopped at the box office!) Exodus: Gods and Kings.
Egypt banned this movie for its “Zionist view of history”. The same scam perpetrated by the Jews
for 3000 years — changing history to dupe the public — is still being run today in Hollywood.
Although Exodus: Gods and Kings is set in Egypt, you won’t actually be able to see it there.
According to Deadline magazine (and reported by Ezzat), Scott’s adaptation of the biblical story of
Moses has run afoul of Egyptian censors. Abdul Sattar Fathi, the head of the Egyptian state
censorship board, harshly criticized the film, citing “historical mistakes” such as claiming the Jews
built the pyramids and portraying Moses as a general, not a prophet.
“Furthermore,” Fathi said, “it shows ancient Egyptians as a mob group persecuting peaceful Jews.
Our board has refused this out of respect for Egyptians’ feelings.”
(Peaceful Jews, I like that. Could be the only example in history of peaceful Jews. No surprise that
only Hollywood could come with a concept like peaceful Jews, which is surely a type of human
being that has never before been seen in history. Go tell the Palestinians about peaceful Jews.)
Says Ezzat, who remains scrupulously impartial when it comes to contemporary politics, Egypt is
simply not where this story took place.
At the time, Israel wasn’t there
Jews lie. How many modern examples do you need? Six million dead in a Holocaust that never
happened? People all over the world paying reparations for crimes they didn’t commit and being
thrown in jail when they ask for proof of these crimes. A Jewish company producing poison food
and a Jewish government forcing people to eat it. Jews murdering thousands of unarmed peasants
and calling it self defense, triggering wars all over the world through covert manipulation of
governments it has bought.
Current Israeli rabble rouser Binyamin Netanyahu said recently in a speech that the Jewish people
were building Jerusalem 3000 years ago. Yet another Jewish lie.
Ezzat says no.
“The Jewish people were not building Jerusalem 3000 years ago, i.e. 1000 BC . . .
There was no invasion of geographical Palestine from Egypt by former slaves in
the 2200s BCE . . . The chronicle of events of the reign of Ramses II on the wall in
Luxor does not know about any major slave results or flights by same into the
Sinai peninsula. Egyptian sources never heard of Moses or the 12 plagues.”

Jerusalem not only was not being built by the likely then non-existent “Jewish people” in 1000
BCE, but Jerusalem probably was not even inhabited at that point in history. Jerusalem appears to
have been abandoned between 1000 BCE and 900 BCE, the traditional dates for the united kingdom
under David and Solomon.
So Jerusalem was not ‘the city of David,’ since there was no city there when he is said to have lived
there. No sign of magnificent palaces or great states has been found in the archeology of this period,
and the Assyrian tablets, which recorded even minor events throughout the Middle East, such as the
actions of Arab queens, don’t know anything about any great kingdom of David and Solomon in
geographical Palestine.
Not a thing.
Palestine was not the homeland for the kingdom of Israel and the stories of its early patriarchs. The
inception of Judaism and the stories of Abraham, Isaac, Joseph and Moses happened in Arabia and
Yemen, Ezzat writes. The blatant failure of Biblical archeology in the land of Palestine is primarily
due to a premise completely flawed and a Bible (Septaguint) cunningly tampered with (by the same
evil creeps who manipulate our news and educational materials today).
Egypt’s written records date back to 1870 BC. No trace of the Israelites.

Slavery was a common tradition in Arabia but not in Egypt. Slavery didn’t come to Egypt “until 7th
to 4th century BC, with the influence of the Persian/Greek invasions.”
This tradition of slavery lingers on in Yemen, where foreigners aren’t allowed to get a job without
the sponsorship of a native called a kafeel who control all aspects of their lives.
In his breakthrough theory “Bible Came from Arabia” Dr. Kamal Salibi has discovered more than
one hundred place names in Arabia and North Yemen that amazingly matched the ones mentioned
in the Torah, Ezzat writes.
“Placing the Israelites back in their native Arabic land will no longer make the pervasive future of
slavery in the stories of Joseph and Moses alien or inexplicable, or the walls and fortifications of
mountainous villages tumbled by Joshua unreal and unverifiable.
“The land Joshua conquered was a small territory in North Yemen. The Egypt of the Bible is not the
Egypt of the NIle Valley but an obscure little town in the southwestern desert of ancient Arabia
called Mizraim, or Misr in Hebrew and Arabic.
“The Exodus took place in a much humbler way and on a much narrower scale in an obscure little
village in ancient South Arabia,” Ezzat writes.
“If Egypt knew no Pharaohs, then it goes without saying that Egypt never knew Moses, either. And
if Moses never set foot in Egypt, then the Exodus’ road map into the Promised Land has to be
redrawn.”
A conception of world harmony
The lies began a long time ago. According to the Old Testament, written by Jews, ancient Egypt is
the land of idolatry, tyranny and slavery.
It is this slander at which Ezzat bristles, because the precepts of the ancient Egyptian religion were
plagiarized by its Christian and Muslim successors lock, stock and barrel.
“Maat is the Egyptian concept of world harmony based on justice, balance and truth. Maat, or the
lady of truth, as personified by ancient Egyptians in the shape of a lady wearing the feather of truth
on her head and holding the balance of justice, is the code of ethics by which all Egyptians,
including monarchs, should follow,” Ezzat writes.
The late Prof. Breasted, in a beautiful introduction to his 1933 classic Dawn of Conscience, writes
in a live link from the book:
“The Egyptians possessed a standard of morals far superior to that of the
Decalogue (the Ten Commandments) over a thousand years before the Decalogue
was written.”
Famous Egyptologist Professor James Henry Breasted
in his office at the Oriental Institute, 1929
So Ezzat is not making this stuff up. Breasted is one of the most respected historians ever. And
Ezzat’s insistence that much of the material in the Old Testament is fabricated, distorted and
plagiarized is true.
For instance, the wisdom of Amenemope, preserved in an Egyptian papyrus in the British Museum,
was translated into Hebrew in ancient times and, circulating in Palestine, was the source for a whole
section of the Old Testament Book of Proverbs.
“Our moral heritage derives from a wider human past enormously older than the Hebrews, and it
has come to us rather through the Hebrews than from them. Man arose to high moral vision two
thousand years before the Hebrew nation was born,” Ezzat writes.
Just like in modern times, when in World War II Germany was presented as the bad guy while the
Jewish countries the U.S., Britain and Soviet Union were presented as the good guys, the Hebrews
presented Israelite interlopers as the brave heroes and innocent Egyptians as the villains, which like
the juxtaposition of Israeli murderers and Palestinian victims into Jew freedom fighters and Islamic
terrorists is a historical injustice and unforgivable lie of the type that so debilitates our existence
today.
Jews lie. They always have, and they always will.