JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN & EAST EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGY

2021, VOL. 58, NOS. 3–4, 232–235

https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2021.1933838

Selected References

V.A. Petrovsky

(1) Ackoff, R., and F. Emery. 1974. “O tseleustremlennykh sistemakh.”

Moscow: Soviet Radio.
(2) Asmolov, A.G. 1982. “Osnovnye poniatiia psikhologicheskogo ana­
liza v teorii deiatel’nosti.” Voprosy psikhologii, no. 2, pp. 14 – 28.
(3) ______. 2007. Psikhologiia lichnosti: kul’turno-istoricheskoe ponima­
niie razvitiia cheloveka. Moscow: Smysl; Akademiia.
(4) Asmolov, A.G., and V.A. Petrovsky. 1978. “O dinamicheskom pod­
khode k psikhologicheskomu analizu deiatel’nosti.” Voprosy psikho­
logii, no. 1, pp. 70 – 80.
(5) Bakhtin, M.M. 1975. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Moscow:
Khudozh. lit.
(6) Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundation of thought and action.
Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
(7) Basov, M.Ia. 1928. Obshchie osnovy pedologii. Moscow, Leningrad:
GIZ.
(8) Bernstein, N.A. 1990. Fiziologiia dvizhenii i aktivnost. Moscow: Nauka.
(9) Bogoiavlenskaia, D.B. 1983. Intellektual’naia aktivnost’ kak pro­
blema tvorchestva. Rostov-on-Don: Izd-vo Rostovskogo gosudarst­
vennogo universiteta.
(10) Borodenko, M.V. 1996. Dva litsa Ianusa-smekha. Rostov-on-Don:
Fenix.
(11) Bourbaki, N. 1965. Teoriia mnozhestv. Moscow: Mir.
(12) Bourbaki, N. 1966. Obshchaia topologiia. Основные структуры.
Moscow: Mir.
(13) Brehm, J.W. 1966. A theory of psychological reactance. New York:
Academic Press.
(14) Brehm, J.W., and E. Rosen. 1972. Attractiveness of old alterna­
tives. When a new attractive alternative is introduced. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, no. 3, vol. 20, pp. 261 – 66.

English translation © 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, from the Russian text, V.A. Petrovsky,
“Bibliografiia,” in Chelovek nad Situatsiei (Moscow: Smysl, 2010), pp. 547–557.
Translated by Susan Welsh. References have been renumbered for this edition.—Ed. Published with the
publisher’s permission.
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
 JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN & EAST EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGY 233

(15) Csiksentmihalyi, M. 1975. Beyond boredom and anxiety. San

Francisco: Jossey Bass.
(16) DeCharms, R. 1968. Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.
(17) Deci, E.L. 1975. Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
(18) Davydov, V.V. 1979. “Psikhologiia obraza.” Vestnik Moskovskogo
universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiia. no. 4, pp. 3 – 13.
(19) Ehrenburg, I. 1928 – 1929. Sobr. soch., V 9 t. Moscow, Leningrad,
vol. 1.
(20) Ershov, P.M. 1972. Rezhissura kak prakticheskaia psikhologiia.
Moscow: Isskustvo.
(21) Tsaregorodtseva, G.I., ed. 1975. Filosofskie problemy teorii adaptat­
sii. Moscow: Meditsina.
(22) Heckhausen, H. 1986. Motivatsiia i deiatel’nost’: V 2 t. Moscow:
Pedagogika.
(23) Hegel, G.W.F. 1972. Nauka logiki. Moscow: Mysl, vol. 3.
(24) Ishkova, M.A. 1998. Fenomen granitsy v determnatsii aktivnosti
rebenka: Dis. . . . cand. psikhol. nauk. Moscow.
(25) Iudin, E.G. 1978. Sistemnyi podkhod i printsip deiatel’nosti.
Metodologicheskie problemy sovremennoi nauki. Moscow: Nauka.
(26) Ivannikov, V.A. 1985. K sushchnosti volevogo povedeniia. Psikhol.
zhurn, no. 3, vol. 6. pp. 47–55.
(27) James, W. 1991. Psikhologiia. [Russian translation of Psychology].
Moscow: Pedagogika.
(28) Kanfer, F.H. 1970. Self-regulation: Research, issues and specula­
tions. In Behavior modification in clinical psychology, ed.
C. Neuringer and J.L. Michael. New York: Appleton-Century-
Crofts, pp. 178 – 220.
(29) Karpenko, L.A. Motiv. 1985. In Kratkii psikhologicheskii slovar’, ed.
A.V. Petrovskii and M.G. Yaroshevsky. Moscow: Politizdat.
(30) Kharash, A.U. 1980. “Printsip deiatel’nosti v issledovanii mezhlich­
nostnogo vospriiatiia.” Voprosy Psikhologii, no. 3, pp. 86 – 96.31
(31) Klimov, E.A. 2004. Psikhologiia professional’nogo samoopredeleniia,
2nd ed. Moscow: Akademiia, p. 32.
(32) Kornilova, T.V. 1994. Diagnostika “lichnostnykh faktorov” prinia­
tiia reshenii. Vopr.psikhol., no. 6. pp. 99 – 109.
(33) Kozielecki, J. 1991. Chekovek mnogomernyi (Psikhologicheskie esse).
Kiev.
(34) Kuz’mina, E.V. 1994. Psikhologiia svobody. Moscow: Izd-vo
Moskovskogo universiteta.
(35) Leontiev, A.A. 1969. Iazyk, rech’, rechevaia deiatel’nost’. Moscow:
Prosveshchenie.
(36) Leontiev, A.N. 1975. Deiatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’. Moscow:
Politizdat.
234 V.A. PETROVSKY

(37) Lindsay, P.H., and D.A. Norman, 1972. Human information proces­
sing: An introduction to psychology. Cambridge, MA: Academic
Press.
(38) Lotman, Iu.M. 1970. Stat’’i po tipologii kul’tury. Tartu.
(39) Luria, A.R. 1962. Vysshie korkovye funktsii cheloveka i ikh narush­
enie pri likal’nykh porazheniiakh mozga. Moscow: Izdv-vo Mosk.
Un-ta.
(40) Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1985. Izbr. proizvedeniia. Moscow:
Politizdat, vol. 1.
(41) Petrovsky, A.V. 1967. Istoriia sovetskoi psikhologii. Formirovanie
osnov psikhologicheskoi nauki. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
(42) Petrovsky, V.A. 1971. “Eksperimental’noe izuchenie riska kak ten­
dentsii lichnosti,” Materialy IV s″ezda Vsesoiuznogo obshchestva
psikhologov. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, pp. 429 –30.
(43) ______. 1974a. “Tendentsiia k svobodnomu risku
i samoutverzhdenie lichnosti.” Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskie aspekti
obshchestvennoi deiatel’nosti v formirovanii lichnosti. Moscow.
(44) ______. 1974b. “Povedenie cheloveka v situatsii opasnosti (k psi­
khologii riska).” Novye issledovaniia v psikhologii, no. 1, pp. 23 – 24.
(45) ______. 1975. “K psikhologii aktivnosti lichnosti.” Voprosy
Psikhologii, no. 3, pp. 26 – 38.
(46) ______. 1976a. “Aktivnosti lichnosti na etape postanovki problem.”
In Problemnoe obuchenie pri podgotovke inzhenerov. Riga.
(47) ______. 1976b. “Aktivnost’ kak ‘nadsituativnaia deiatel’nost’.” In
Tez. nauchnykh soobshchenii sovetskikh psikhologov k XXI
Mezhdunarodnomu psikhologicheskomu kongressu. Moscow.
(48) ______. 1977. Aktivnost’ sub″ekta v usloviiakh riska. Avtoref. dis. . ..
cand. Psikhologii nauk. Moscow.
(49) 34. ______. 1978. “Issledovanie aktivnosti myshleniia
v poznavatel’noi deiatel’nosti.” In NII problem vysshei shkoly.
Spravochno-informatsionnyi fond. Moscow.
(50) ______, V.A. 1990. “Adaptivnost’–Neadaptivnost’, “Aktivnost’,”
“Aktivnost’ lichnosti,” “Individ,” “Sub’’ekt,” “Aktivnost’ nadsitua­
tivnaia.” In Psikhologiia. Slovar’, 2nd ed., ed. A.V. Petrovskii.
Moscow: Politizdat.
(51) ______. 1992. Psikhologiia neadaptivnoi aktivnosti. Moscow:
Gorbunok.
(52) ______. 1996a. Aktivnost’. In Vvedenie v psikhologiiu: Ucheb. dlia
ped. Vuzov, ed. A.V. Petrovskii. Moscow: Akademiia.
(53) ______. 1996b. Lichnost’ v psikhologii: paradigma sub″ektnosti.
Rostov-on-Don: Fenix.
(54) ______. 2000. “Filosofiia ‘Ia’: Tranzaktnyi podkhod. In E. Berne.
Gruppovaia psikhoterapiia. Moscow, pp. 423 – 56.
 JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN & EAST EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGY 235

(55) Petrovsky, V.A., and E.M. Cherepanova. 1987. “Individual’nye oso­

bennosti samokontrolia pri organizatsii vnimaniia.” Voprosy
Psikhologii, no. 5, pp. 48 – 56.
(56) Ribot, T. 2001. Psikhologiia vnimaniia. Khrestomatiia po psikhologii,
ed. Iu.B. Gippenreiter, V.Ia. Romanov. Moscow: CheRo, pp. 297 –
300.
(57) Ross, L., and R. Nisbett. 1999. Chelovek i situatsiia. [Translation of
The Person and the Situation.] Moscow: Aspekt-Press.
(58) Rubinstein, S.L. 1973. Problemy obshchei psikhologii. Moscow:
Pedagogika.
(59) Slovar’ inostrannykh slov. 1979. Moscow.
(60) Shchedrovitsky, G.P. 1977. “K kharakteristike kategorial’nykh opre­
delenii deiatel’nosti,” Problema deiatel’nosti vi sovetskoi psikhologii.
Tezisy dokladov k V Vsesoiuznomu s″ezdu obshchestva psikhologii.
Moscow, vol. 1.
(61) Simonov, P.V. 1975. Vysshaia nervnaia deiatel’nost’ cheloveka.
Motivatsionno-emotsional’nye askpekty. Moscow: Nauka.
(62) Tagliagambe, S. 1985. “Zritel’noe vospriiatie kak metafora.” Vopr.
filos, no. 10, pp. 123 – 31.
(63) Tolstoy, L.N. 1956. Poln. sobr. soch.: V. 90 t., Moscow:
Khudozhestvennaia literatura, vol. 26.
(64) White, R.W. 1959. “Motivation reconsidered. The concept of com­
petence.” Psychological Review, vol. 66, pp. 297 – 333.
(65) Yaroshevsky, M.G. 1974. Psikhologiia v XX stoletii, 2nd ed. Moscow:
Politizdat.
(66) Zinchenko, V.P., and S.D. Smirnov. 1983. Metodologicheskie
voprosy. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta.
Copyright of Journal of Russian & East European Psychology is the property of Taylor &
Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.