Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
EDUCAÇÃO FÍSICA
Nº 130 ABRIL DE 2005
COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF decreasing training, with three sets at 90, 75 and 60%
NEUROMUSCULAR TRAINING, SPECIFICALLY of the number of repetitions done in the pre-test,
FOR FIXED-BAR FLEXIONS rounded down, presenting pre-test results of 5,96 ±
1,77 repetitions. In both cases body density was
Abstract evaluated by the three skinfold protocol (Jackson &
Pollock, 1978), and body fat (G%) was evaluated by
The Brazillian Army submits its military Siri's equation (1961). The rest time between sets was
personnel to a Physical Assessment Test (PAT) three two minutes, and the training was realized three days
times a year, to check individual physical standards. a week. After the third week of training, an intermediate
The pull-up on the fixed-bar, a test of PAT, assesses test was realized, with the same conditions as the
the physical qualities of strength and localized pre-test, to carry out the overloading evaluation based
muscular endurance of the upper limbs (Brasil, 1997), on the new performance. After the seventh week of
and it has been one of the causes of insufficiency training, a post-test was realized, with the same
results in PAT. The aim of this study was to compare conditions as the pre-test, with a result of 10,06 ± 2,65
the multiple sets method with the decreasing for GS and of 10,35 ± 2,28 for GD. The two way ANOVA
pyramidal sets method of neuromuscular training, statistic test was used and presented significant
specifically for the pull-up exercise. Taking part in this differences between the groups (F= 37,29 to p= 0,00).
study were 58 male, physically active military The Tukey test was used to check which groups
personnel from the Reserve Officers Preparation showed significant difference. It was seen that
Center of Rio de Janeiro (CPOR-RJ). A pre-test of between pre-test and post-test, intra-groups,
maximum pull-up repetitions with all the sample was significant differences did not occur (p= 0,956). Both
realized. Based on performance, the individuals were applied neuromuscular training methods seemed
split into two homogeneous groups, according to the effective for the sample considered, according to the
Levene Test (F= 0,55 to p= 0,45). The first group (GS), pre-test, not presenting significant differences in the
aged 18,29 ± 0,53 years, body mass 62,58 ± 8,18 Kg, post-test. It is suggested that both methods be
height 1,72 ± 0,07 m and body fat percentual (G%) included in the Manual of Military Physical Training (C-
6,72 ± 5,03, performed training of three sets, that 20-20), as a complementary activity to neuromuscular
consisted of making three sets at 75% of the number training, in order to obtain a better performance in the
of repetitions done in the pre-test, rounded down, pull-up exercise in the PAT.
presenting pre-test results of 6,00 ± 1,76 repetitions.
The second group (GD), aged 18,53 ± 0,78 years,
body mass 63,62 ± 9,22 Kg, height 1,72 ± 0,06 m and Keywords: Neuromuscular training, pull-up exercise,
body fat percentual (G%) 8,01 ± 4,33, realized localized muscular endurance.
Procedimentos
RESULTADOS
O segundo grupo, com idade de 18,53 ± 0,78
anos, massa corporal de 63,62 ± 9,22 Kg, estatura Verificou-se a normalidade das variáveis por meio
de 1,72 ± 0,06 m, G% de 7,43 ± 4,27 % e resultado no do teste K-S, apresentando distribuição normal (GS
pré-teste de 5,96 ± 1,77 repetições, realizou o inicial = 0,941, para p = 0,338 e GD inicial= 0,847, para
treinamento piramidal decrescente (GD), constituído p = 0,469; GS final = 0,605, para p = 0,858 e GD final =
por três séries de repetições equivalentes a 90, 75 e 0,587, para p = 0,881). Os resultados dos testes de
60%, respectivamente, dos valores alcançados no flexão na barra fixa, no pré-teste, no teste intermediário
TRM, arredondados para os valores inteiros inferiores. e no pós-teste, são apresentados na TABELA 4.
A TABELA 2 apresenta o programa de treinamento
(número de repetições por série) para o GD. TABELA 4:
Resultados dos testes de FBBF em diferentes
TABELA 2: fases do treinamento
Programa de treinamento inicial para o GD
REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE CARPINELLI RN, OTTO RM. Strength training.
POSITION STAND. The recommended quantity Single versus multiple sets. Sports Med 1998;26
and quality of exercise for developing and (2): 74-84.
maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular
fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci DOCHERTY D, SPORER B. A proposed model
Sports Exerc 1998; 30( 6): 916-20. for examining the interference phenomen between
concurrent aerobic and strength training. Sports
BERGER RA. Effect of varied weight training Med 2001; 30(6): 386-94.
programs on strength. Res Q 1962; 33(2): 168-81.
FERNANDES FILHO J. A prática da avaliação
______. Comparative effects of three weight física. Rio de Janeiro: Shape, 2003.
training programs. Res Q 1963; 34(3):396-8.
LINCOLN AT. Treinamento de exaustão de flexão SILVA EB, GOMES PSC. Confiabilidade do teste de
na barra fixa. in press. campo “puxada na barra” em militares com 18 anos
de idade”. Artus – Revista de Educação Física e
LIPPERT MAM, ARAÚJO JR FTC, MENDONÇA CP,
Desportos (UGF)1999; 19( 1)
SOSTER H, CARNEIRO EC, SILVA ELP, COSTA FA,
NASCIMENTO SS, PINHEIRO-DaCUNHA RS, LA
PORTA JÚNIOR MAM, SILVA EB. Treinamento SIRI WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and
neuromuscular e testes de flexão de braços e puxada densitiv. Techiniques for measuring body
na barra fixa de militares recém incorporados ao composition. Washington (DC): National Academy
Exército Brasileiro. Revista de Educação Física 2003; of Science 1961; 233-244.
127:104.
MATVEEV L. Fundamentos do treino desportivo. THOMAS JR, NELSON JK. Métodos de pesquisa
Lisboa: Livros Horizonte, 1986. em atividade física. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2002.