Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
● Originária do México e do
Sul dos Estados Unidos;
Fig. 1. Distribuição atual do peixe mosquito a nível mundial (Dave Fryxell and Travis Apgar).
Características invasivas
Aumento da
agressividade
Alteração do
intra e inter
nicho ecológico
espécie Rhadinocentrus ornatus
Níveis de stress
elevados e maior
vulnerabilidade a
predadores Suscetibilidade a
(Gunther Schmida)
infecções secundárias.
Provocam
Impactos negativos
gggdfgdfgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
gggggggggg
Fig. 14. Mapa da evolução da distribuição geográfica da espécie Sus scrofa. (Wehr, 2020)
Fig. 13. Porcos selvagens (Sus Scrofa). (“Feral pig -
Wikiwand,” n.d.)
Sucesso adaptativo
Omnívoro oportunista
Fig. 15. Sus scrofa alimentando-se de vegetação. Fig. 16. Sus scrofa caçando.
(“Experto Universitario en Gestión Cinegética,” 2021) (“Deer hunters face unwanted competition as feral hog explosion thins
herds,” 2016)
… em ambientes antropogênicos
este também se adapta
Impactos
HERE IS THE negativos
SLIDE TITLE!
Casuar (Casuarius
casuarius)(Southernms, 2019)
Fig. 18. Os Sus scrofa conseguem danificar e modificar o solo. (“Managing invasive
species in wetlands,” 2019)
HERE IS THE SLIDE TITLE!
Impactos económicos
● Predação de cordeiros;
● Transmitir doenças para o gado; “According to a local rancher, his estate lost
1,800 lambs to the mouths of wildboars in
● Dano nos campos de cultivo. just two years” (Sordi, 2020)
Conclusão
HERE IS THE SLIDE TITLE!
● Andrew, J. B., Matthew, N., MITCHELL, J. L., PEARSON, H. E., & SAUNDERS, G. R. (2014). Impacts and management of wild pigs Sus
scrofa in Australia.
● Bowman, D. M. J. S., & McDonough, L. (1991). Feral pig (Sus scrofa) rooting in a monsoon forest-wetland transition, northern Australia.
Wildlife Research, 18(6), 761-765.
● Darrigran, G. (2002). Potential impact of filter-feeding invaders on temperate inland freshwater environments. Biological invasions, 4(1), 145-
156.
● Grosholz, E. (2002). Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends in ecology & evolution, 17(1), 22-27.
● Fan, X., Lin, Z., Li, X., Wei, L., & Ding, G. (2016). Effects of predation by invasive western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) on survival of
eggs, embryos and tadpoles of Pelophylax nigromaculatus and Duttaphrynus melanostictus in South China. Asian Herpetological Research, 7,
46-52.
● Hancock, G. R., Lowry, J. B. C., Dever, C., & Braggins, M. (2015). Does introduced fauna influence soil erosion? A field and modelling
assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 518, 189-200.
● Innal, D., & Giannetto, D. (2020). Occurrence of Gambusia holbrooki Girard, 1859 (Poeciliidae) in four Mediterranean river estuaries of
Turkey, nursery habitats of several native and threatened species. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 72(4), 553-560.
● Keller, K., & Brown, C. (2008). Behavioural interactions between the introduced plague minnow Gambusia holbrooki and the vulnerable native
Australian ornate rainbowfish Rhadinocentrus ornatus, under experimental conditions. Journal of Fish Biology, 73(7), 1714-1729.
● Kolar, C. S., & Lodge, D. M. (2001). Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in ecology & evolution, 16(4), 199-204.
● Koutika, L. S., & Rainey, H. J. (2015). A review of the invasive, biological and beneficial characteristics of aquatic species Eichhornia
Crassipes and Salvinia molesta. Applied ecology and environmental research, 13(1), 85-97.
● Managing invasive species in wetlands. (2019, December 17). Retrieved from Arthur Rylah Institute website:
https://www.ari.vic.gov.au/research/pests-weeds-and-overabundant-species/managing-invasive-species-in-wetlands
Referências
● Natusch, D. J., Mayer, M., Lyons, J. A., & Shine, R. (2017). Interspecific interactions between feral pigs and native birds reveal both positive
and negative effects. Austral Ecology, 42(4), 479-485.
● Pereira, C. Z., Rosa, C. A., & Zanzini, A. C. (2019). Perception of the presence, impacts and control of the invasive species Sus scrofa in the
local community living near the Itatiaia National Park, Brazil. Ethnobiology and Conservation, 8.
● Pyke, G. H. (2005). A review of the biology of Gambusia affinis and G. holbrooki. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 15(4), 339-365.
● Salvador, C. H., & Fernandez, F. (2018). Biological invasion of wild boar and feral pigs Sus scrofa (Suidae) in South America: review and
mapping with implications for conservation of peccaries (Tayassuidae). Ecology, conservation and management of wild pigs and peccaries.
Cambridge Univ. Press.
● Sordi, C. (2020). Bicho bandido: wild boars, biological invasions and landscape transformations on the Brazilian–Uruguayan border (Pampas
region). Social Anthropology, 28(3), 614-628.
● Sousa, R., Antunes, C., & Guilhermino, L. E. D. P. S. (2008). Ecology of the invasive Asian clam Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774) in aquatic
ecosystems: an overview. In Annales de Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology (Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 85-94). EDP Sciences.
● Vannini, A., Bruni, G., Ricciardi, G., Platania, L., Mori, E., & Tricarico, E. (2018). Gambusia holbrooki, the ‘tadpolefish’: The impact of its
predatory behaviour on four protected species of European amphibians. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 28(2),
476-484.
● Villamagna, A. M., & Murphy, B. R. (2010). Ecological and socio‐economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a
review. Freshwater biology, 55(2), 282-298.
● Wehr, N. H. (2020). Historical range expansion and biological changes of Sus scrofa corresponding to domestication and feralization. Mammal
Research, 1-12.
● Yan, S. H., Song, W., & Guo, J. Y. (2017). Advances in management and utilization of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in aquatic
ecosystems–a review. Critical reviews in biotechnology, 37(2), 218-228.