GPTI – GESTÃO DE PROJETOS DE TI

PROFESSORES JOÃO MELLO DA SILVA, EDISON ISHIKAWA

SUMÁRIO
APÊNDICE AO5–DETALHAMENTO PRONTIDÃO EM INOVAÇÃO ..................................................................... 1
APÊNDICE AO5–DETALHAMENTO PRONTIDÃO EM INOVAÇÃO
A Prontidão em Inovação é a síntese de componentes de Produto, Processo e Mercado. Por seu turno, a dimensão Prontidão
(Readiness) em Inovação está conceitualmente associada aos 5 primeiros TRLs da NASA: TRL1-Basic principles observed and
reported; TRL2-Technology concept and/or application; TRL3-Analytical and experimental critical function and/or proof of
concept; TRL4-Component and/or breadboard validation in laboratory environment; and TRL5-Component and/or breadboard
validation in relevant environment. Vale também ressaltar duas concentrações de 3 TRLs em Academia: Knowledge creation
(A-Basic technology research: TRLs 1,2,3; e B-Research to prove feasibility: TRLs 2,3,4), como também uma concentração em
Government and Civil Society Representative Entities: Incentive and support to collaboration (C-Technology demonstration:
TRLs 3,4,5). A face do triângulo e suas arestas na Figura AO5.1 mostram graficamente os relacionamentos direcionados entre
esses componentes.

PRODUTO

PRONTIDÃO EM
INOVAÇÃOγ1

PC→MC X PC←MC

FIGURA AO5.1–TRIÂNGULO SÍNTESE DE PRONTIDÃO EM INOVAÇÃO

Tomando como premissa que Prontidão em Inovação está diretamente associada a Sistemas Sustentáveis, Inovadores e
Garantidores de Privacidade (SAH.SIP), cabe descrever a arquitetura de um SAH.SIP em termos de (i) Stakeholders Internos
(Quem); (ii) Segmentação de objetos que criam valor (Capitais/Objetos de Valor – OVs: O Que); (iii) Espaços de relacionamentos
internos e externos (Onde); e (iv) fluxos de capitais/OVs (Como), conforme a Figura AO5.2.
SISTEMA SUSTENTÁVEL E INOVADOR DE ATIVIDADES HUMANAS (SSIAH)
SÍNTESE
CONJUNTO DE ELEMENTOS INTER-RELACIONADOS

QUEM? O QUE? ONDE? COMO?

PODER TANGIBILIDADE OBTENÇÃO FUNÇÃO

URGÊNCIA FORMAS TRANSFORMAÇÃO ESTRUTURA ANÁLISE

LEGITIMIDADE MÉTRICAS PROVISÃO PROCESSO

INTERESSES CONTABILIZAÇÃO ENCADEAMENTO DINÂMICA

FINALIDADE
FINALIDADE ESTABELECER
RELACIONAMENTOS
APLICAR MÉTRICAS DE INTERNOS E EXTERNOS
VALORAÇÃO ENVOLVENDO FR
FORMAS E TANGIBILIDADE
FACES DE
RELACIONAMENTO FINALIDADE
FINALIDADE
DISPONIBILIZAR PROCESSOS QUE
IDENTIFICAR E CARACTERIZAR CONSOLIDEM FUNÇÕES E
INTERESSADOS INTERNOS ESTRUTURAS EM MOVIMENTAÇÕES
OVs DE OBJETOS DE VALOR
II OBJETOS DE MO
INTERESSADOS VALOR
INTERNOS MOVIMENTAÇÕES DE
(STAKEHOLDERS) OBJETOS DE VALOR

SSIAH

SÍNTESE

FIGURA AO5.2–ARQUITETURA DE SISTEMAS SUSTENTÁVEIS, INOVADORES E PROTETORES DE PRIVACIDADE

1
A Figura AO5.3 mostra os ambientes natural e social, bem como os macrossistemas sociais com interesses delimitando suas
macrofronteiras. Além dos contextos específicos que, juntamente com as bordas e o escopo configuram a coesão do SSIG, as
setas da parte central da Figura AO5.3 explicitam os seguintes relacionamentos associados a seus quatro constituintes:
 Relacionamentos Externos
 Entradas de Capitais de Contextos de Entradas, compostos por Provedores e Outros Interessados Externos;
 Saídas de Capitais para Contextos de Saídas, compostos por Clientes e Outros Interessados Externos.
 Relacionamentos Internos
 Os capitais que entraram via Entrada de Capitais são combinados com as disponibilidades internas, visando à adição
interna de valor e à alocação do valor total adicionado;
 Os Stakeholders Internos interagem de acordo com os seus interesses em fluxos de Capitais que resultarão em adição
interna de valor e à alocação do valor total adicionado. Vale ressaltar que entre os Stakeholders Internos ocorrem
interações em três níveis de convivência: pessoal, institucional e em rede.
 Os capitais resultantes da valorização interna são encaminhados para as Saídas de Capitais.

AMBIENTE NATURAL
PROCURA MONITORAMENTO OFERTA
AMBIENTE SOCIAL
ECOSSISTEMAS SOCIAIS E NATURAIS PRÓXIMOS
CONTEXTOS DE ENTRADAS: PROVEDORES E INFLUÊNCIA CONTEXTOS DE SAÍDAS: CLIENTES E
OUTROS STAKEHOLDERS OUTROS STAKEHOLDERS

CONTROLE
PRODUTOS E
INSUMOS E FR SAÍDAS DE CAPITAIS
ENTRADAS DE CAPITAIS FACES DE
RESULTADOS
RESULTADOS RELACIONAMENTO

INDUSTRIALIZAÇÃO & SOLUÇÃO

CP
II CAPITAIS FV
INTERESSADOS FLUXOS DE
INTERNOS VALORIZAÇÃO
(STAKEHOLDERS) DE CAPITAIS

COLETIVO HUMANO SUSTENTÁVEL E INOVADOR

PROXIMIDADES CONFLUÊNCIA

FIGURA AO5.3–VALORIZAÇÃO EM SISTEMAS SUSTENTÁVEIS E INOVADORES DE ATIVIDADES HUMANAS

Como 4 títulos geram maiores possibilidades de interseções para as buscas bibliométricas, ao invés de consolidar Prontidão
em Inovação em 3 títulos (Produto, Processo, Mercado), uma possibilidade é levar em conta os 2 principais processos
(Customer Relationship Management – CRM e Supplier Relationship Management – SRM) vinculados a Mercados de
Obtenção/Procura e Provisão/Oferta da Gestão da Cadeia de Suprimento (Supply Chain Management – SCM) e dividir Mercado
em 2 componentes (Obtenção e Provisão), o que cria 4 grandes títulos: (i) Obtenção/Procura; (ii) Processo/Industrialização;
(iii) Produto/Solução; e (iv) Provisão/Oferta.
Conforme a Figura AO5.4, as concentrações de Prontidão em Inovação são tratadas como resultante das concentrações
Research&Experimental Development=α; Innovation=β; Readiness Levels=γ; e Readiness Assessment= δ).

2
 FRASCATI & OSLO MANUALS →CONCENTRATIONS OF RESEARCH & INNOVATION
RESEARCH AND EXPERIMENTAL DEVELOPMENT: α=RE
PRODUCTS/R: α1=DR
PROCESSES/R: α2=PR
COLLABORATION/R: α3=LR
INNOVATION: β=IN READINESS LEVELS: Ƴ=RL READINESS ASSESSMENT: δ=RA
PRODUCTS/I: β1=DI TRL/MRL: Ƴ1=TL TRA: δ1=TA
PROCESSES/I: β2=PI IRL/SRL: Ƴ2=SL SRA: δ2=SA
COLLABORATION/I: β3=LI CR: Ƴ3=CL CRA: δ3=CA

FIGURA AO5.4–CONCENTRAÇÕES DE PRONTIDÃO EM INOVAÇÃO

AO5.1–TRLs DA NASA
Em uma adaptação da Tabela “Technology Readiness Level Definitions”
(https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/458490main_TRL_Definitions.pdf), os 9 Níveis de Prontidão Tecnológica/Technology Readiness
Levels – TRLs da NASA’s podem ser combinados em 6 Concentrações (A a F). Essas Concentrações delimitam os principais
Participantes (1-Academia/Academia; 2-Governo e Entidades Representativas da Sociedade Civil/Government and Civil
Society Representative Entities; and 3-Setor Privado, Entidades Estatais e ONGs/Private Sector, State Entities and NGOs) e
respectivos papéis (1-Criação de Conhecimento/Knowledge Creation; 2-Incentivo e Suporte à Colaboração/Incentive and
Support to Collaboration; and 3-Produtos Comerciais e Sucesso na Implementação de Serviços Públicos/Commercial
Products and Public Services Implementation Success).
É possível gerar definições operacionais em inglês para os Papéis dos Principais Participantes em termos de seus components,
que servem de base para caracterização das atividades relacionadas:
(1) The Academia Role of Knowledge Creation encompasses TRL Concentrations A and B
A-Basic Technology Research: TRL1-Basic Principles Observed and Reported; TRL2-Technology Concept and/or
Application; TRL3-Analytical and Experimental Critical Function and/or Characteristic Proof of Concept;
B-Research to Prove Feasibility: TRL2-; TRL3-; TRL4-Component and/or Breadboard Validation Laboratory Environment);
TRL Overlays: Concentrations A and B: TRL2 and TRL3.
(2) The Government and Civil Society Representative Entities Role of Incentive and Support to Collaboration
encompasses TRL Concentrations C and D
C-Technology Demonstration: TRL3-; TRL4-; TRL5-Component and/or Breadboard Validation in Relevant Environment;
D-Technology Development and Prototype: TRL5-; TRL6- System/Sub-System Model or Prototype Demonstration in an
Operational Environment); TRL overlays: (i) Concentrations C and D: TRL5;
(ii) Concentrations C and B: TRL3 and TRL4; (iii) Concentrations C and A: TRL3.
(3) The The Private Sector, State Entities and NGOs Role of Commercial Products and Public Services Implementation
Success encompasses TRL Concentrations E and F
E-Pilot Plan and Scale Up: TRL6-; TRL7-System Prototype Demonstration in an Operational Environment; TRL8-Actual
System Completed and "Flight Qualified" Through Test and Demonstration;
F-Market Launch and Commercialization: TRL7-; TRL8-; TRL9-Actual System Flight Proven through Successful Mission
Operations). TRL overlays: (i) Concentrations E and F: TRL7 and TRL8; (ii) Concentrations E and D: TRL6.
Tomando os Critérios de Saída de TRL/TRL Exit Criteria como base, a Figura AO5.5 mostra as possíveis Entregas dos Principais
Participantes vinculadas às Concentrações de TRLs:
ACADEMIA
A. TRL1-Peer Reviewed Publication of Research Underlying the Proposed Concept/Application; TRL2-Documented
Description of the Application/Concept that Addesses Feasibility and Benefit; TRL3-Documented Analytical/Experimental
Results Validating Predictions of Key Parameters.
B. TRL2-; TRL3-; TRL4-Documented Test Performance Demonstrating Agreement with Analytical Predictions. Documented
Definition of Relevant Environment.
GOVERNMENT AND CIVIL SOCIETY REPRESENTATIVE ENTITIES
C. TRL3-; TRL4-; TRL5-Documented Test Performance Demonstrating Agreement with Analytical Predictions. Documented
Definition of Scaling Requirements.
D. TRL5-; TRL6-Documented Test Performance Demonstrating Agreement with Analytical Predictions.
PRIVATE SECTOR, STATE ENTITIES AND NGOs
E. TRL6-; TRL7-Documented Test Performance Demonstrating Agreement with Analytical Predictions; TRL8-Documented
Test Performance Verifying Agreement with Analytical Predictions.
F. TRL7-; TRL8-; TRL9-Documented Mission Operational Results.

3
TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVELS (Reference: https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/458490main_TRL_Definitions.pdf)
MAJOR PLAYERS AND ROLES
GOVERNMENT PRIVATE SECTOR
ACADEMIA & CIVIL SOCIETY STATE ENTITIES
REPRESENTATIVE ENTITIES NGOs
COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS
TRL DEFINITION HARDWARE DESCRIPTION SOFTWARE DESCRIPTION EXIT CRITERIA
KNOWLEDGE INCENTIVE & SUPPORT TO & PUBLIC SERVICES
CREATION COLLABORATION IMPLEMENTATION
SUCCESS
CONCENTRATIONS OF TRLs
1, 2, 3 2, 3, 4 3, 4, 5 5, 6 6, 7, 8 7, 8, 9
A B C D E F
PEER REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE GENERATED PUBLICATION OF
BASIC PRINCIPLES SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE GENERATED
UNDERPINNING BASIC PROPERTIES OF RESEARCH
1 OBSERVED AND UNDERPINNING HARDWARE
SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE AND UNDERLYING THE
REPORTED TECHNOLOGY CONCEPTS/APPLICATIONS.
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION. PROPOSED CONCEPT

A-BASIC TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH

/APPLICATION.

PRACTICAL APPLICATION IS IDENTIFIED

BUT IS SPECULATIVE, NO EXPERIMENTAL DOCUMENTED
INVENTION BEGINS, PRACTICAL PROOF OR DETAILED ANALYSIS IS DESCRIPTION OF THE

TRLs 1, 2, 3
TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION IS IDENTIFIED BUT IS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT THE CONJECTURE. APPLICATION
2 CONCEPT AND/OR SPECULATIVE, NO EXPERIMENTAL PROOF BASIC PROPERTIES OF ALGORITHMS, /CONCEPT THAT
APPLICATION OR DETAILED ANALYSIS IS AVAILABLE TO REPRESENTATIONS AND CONCEPTS ADDESSES

B-RESEARCH TO PROVE FEASIBILITY

SUPPORT THE CONJECTURE. DEFINED. BASIC PRINCIPLES CODED. FEASIBILITY AND
EXPERIMENTS PERFORMED WITH BENEFIT.
SYNTHETIC DATA.

ANALYTICAL AND ANALYTICAL STUDIES PLACE THE DOCUMENTED

TRLs 2, 3, 4
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNOLOGY IN AN APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT OF LIMITED FUNCIONALITY ANALYTICAL
CRITICAL FUNCTION CONTEXT AND LABORATORY TO VALIDADTE CRITICAL PROPERTIES AND /EXPERIMENTAL
3
AND/OR DEMONSTRATIONS, MODELING AND PREDICTIONS USING NON-INTEGRATED RESULTS VALIDATING
CHARACTERISTIC SIMULATION VALIDATE ANALYTICAL SOFTWARE COMPONENTS. PREDICTIONS OF KEY
PROOF OF CONCEPT PREDICTION. PARAMETERS.

A LOW FIDELITY SYSTEM/COMPONENT
COMPONENT BREADBOARD IS BUILT AND OPERATED
AND/OR TO DEMONSTRATE BASIC
BREADBOARD FUNCTIONALITY AND CRITICAL TEST
4 VALIDATION IN ENVIRONMENTS, AND ASSOCIATED
C-TECHNOLOGY DEMONSTRATION
KEY, FUNCTIONALLY CRITICAL, SOFTWARE
COMPONENTS ARE INTEGRATED, AND
DOCUMENTED TEST PERFORMANCE
FUNCTIONALLY VALIDATED, TO ESTABLISH
DEMONSTRATING AGREEMENT WITH
INTEROPERABILITY AND BEGIN
ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT.
ANALYTICAL PREDICTIONS.

LABORATORY PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS ARE
ENVIRONMENT DEFINED RELATIVE TO THE FINAL
OPERATING ENVIRONMENT.
TRLs 3, 4, 5
DOCUMENTED DEFINITION OF
ENVIRONMENT DEFINED AND
RELEVANT ENVIRONMENT.
PERFORMANCE IN THIS ENVIRONMENT
PREDICTED.

D-TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND PROTOTYPES

A MEDIUM FIDELITY
SYSTEM/COMPONENT BRASSBOARD IS
BUILTAND OPERATED TO DEMONSTRATE
COMPONENT OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN A
AND/OR SIMULATED OPERATIONAL
BREADBOARD ENVIRONMENT WITH REALISTIC
5 AGREEMENT WITH ANALYTICAL PREDICTIONS.
VALIDATION IN SUPPORT ELEMENTS THAT
RELEVANT DEMONSTRATES OVERALL
ENVIRONMENT PERFORMANCE IN CRITICAL AREAS.
PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS ARE MADE
FOR SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT
PHASES.
END-TO-END SOFTWARE ELEMENTS
IMPLEMENTED AND INTERFACED WITH
EXISTING SYSTEMS/SIMULATIONS
CONFORMING TO TARGET ENVIRONMENT.
DOCUMENTED TEST PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATING
END-TO-END SOFTWARE SYSTEM, TESTED
IN RELEVANT ENVIRONMENT, MEETING
DOCUMENTED DEFINITION OF SCALING REQUIREMENTS.
PREDICTED PERFORMANCE. OPERATIONAL
ENVIRONMENT PERFORMANCE TRLs 5, 6
PREDICTED. PROTOTYPE
IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOPED.

A HIGH FIDELITY SYSTEM/COMPONENT PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

SYSTEM/SUB-SYSTEM PROTOTYPE THAT ADEQUATELY SOFTWARE DEMONSTRATED ON FULL-
MODEL OR ADDRESSES ALL CRITICAL SCALING SCALE REALISTIC PROBLEMS. PARTIALLY
PROTOTYPE ISSUES IS BUILT AND OPERATED IN A INTEGRATE WITH EXISTING DOCUMENTED TEST PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATING AGREEMENT WITH
6
DEMONSTRATION IN RELEVANT ENVIRONMENT TO HARDWARE/SOFTWARE SYSTEMS. LIMITED ANALYTICAL PREDICTIONS.
AN OPERATIONAL DEMONSTRATE OPERATIONS UNDER DOCUMENTATION AVAILABLE.
ENVIRONMENT CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY FULLY
CONDITIONS. DEMONSTRATED.
E-PILOT PLAN AND SCALE UP

A HIGH FIDELITY ENGINEERING UNIT PROTOTYPE SOFTWARE EXISTS HAVING

THAT ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES ALL
CRITICAL SCALING ISSUES IS BUILT AND
SYSTEM PROTOTYPE
OPERATED IN A RELEVANT
DEMONSTRATION IN
ALL KEY FUNCTIONALITY AVAILABLE FOR
DEMONSTRATION AND TEST. WELL
INTEGRATED WITH OPERATIONAL
TRLs 6, 7, 8

7 AN OPERATIONAL
ENVIRONMENT TO DEMONSTRATE HARDWARE/SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DOCUMENTED TEST PERFORMANCE DEMONSTRATING AGREEMENT WITH ANALYTICAL PREDICTIONS.
PERFORMANCE IN THE ACTUAL DEMONSTRATING OPERATIONAL
ENVIRONMENT
F-MARKET LAUNCH AND COMMERCIALIZATION

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND FEASIBILITY. MOST SOFTWARE BUGS

PLATFORM (GROUND, AIRBORNE, OR REMOVED. LIMITED DOCUMENTATION
SPACE). AVAILABLE.

ALL SOFTWARE HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY

DEBUGGED AND FULLY INTEGRATED WITH
THE FINAL PRODUCT IN ITS FINAL ALL OPERATIONAL HARDWARE AND
TRLs 7, 8, 9

ACTUAL SYSTEM CONFIGURATION IS SUCCESSFULLY SOFTWARE SYSTEMS. ALL USER

COMPLETED AND DEMONSTRATED THROUGH TEST AND
8 "FLIGHT QUALIFIED" ANALYSIS FOR ITS INTENDED
THROUGH TEST AND OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AND
DEMONSTRATION PLATAFORM (GROUND, AIRBORNE, OR
SPACE).
DOCUMENTATION, TRAINING
DOCUMENTATION, AND MAINTENANCE DOCUMENTED TEST PERFORMANCE VERIFYING AGREEMENT WITH ANALYTICAL PREDICTIONS.
DOCUMENTATION COMPLETED. ALL
FUNCTIONALITY SUCCESSFULLY
DEMONSTRATED IN SIMULATED
OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS. VERIFICATION
AND VALIDATION (V&V) COMPLETED.

ALL SOFTWARE HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY

DEBUGGED AND FULLY INTEGRATED WITH
ACTUAL SYSTEM ALL OPERATIONAL HARDWARE AND
FLIGHT PROVEN SOFTWARE SYSTEMS. ALL
THE FINAL PRODUCT IS SUCCESSFULLY
9 THROUGH
OPERATED IN AN ACTUAL MISSION.
DOCUMENTATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. DOCUMENTED MISSION OPERATIONAL RESULTS.
SUCCESSFUL MISSION SUSTAINING SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
OPERATIONS SUPPORT IS IN PLACE. SYSTEM HAS BEEN
SUCCESSFULLY OPERATED IN THE
OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT.

FIGURA AO5.5–NÍVEIS PRONTIDÃO TECNOLÓGICA DA NASA: NÍVEIS, PARTICIPANTES, PAPÉIS E CONCENTRAÇÕES

4