Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Oral Comunitária
C - Administração profissional
1. Gel
2. Verniz
3. Outras formas
Métodos de auto aplicação do flúor
30.000
USO PROFISSIONAL
10.000
1.000
USO DOMÉSTICO
100
10
ÁGUA DE CONSUMO
0,7-1.2 ppm 1
A escovagem com o uso do dentrifico tem
maior vantagem de diminuição de incidência
Métodos de auto aplicação - Den7fricos de caries de que somente uma delas usadas
individualmente
Método mais amplo de uPlização de flúor na prevenção da cárie
dentária
o Fluoreto de sódio monofluorfosfato de sódio;
Fluoreto de amina, Fluoreto estanhoso, Flúor
Fosfato acidulado usado em quadros
de sensibilidade
dentinária
o Outros compostos
Antes dos 2 anos as crianças deglutem 50% do dentifrico.
Maior risco de deglutição de fluor antes dos 6 anos é de fluorose (11% de probabilidade da sua existencia)
O beneYcio dos denBfricos fluoretados está amplamente
documentada na literatura —> por isso muitos paises optam por não fluoretar a agua
—> individuos com higiene baixa nao se deve usar fluor sistemico
Métodos de auto aplicação do flúor – UPlização racional
dos denBfricos fluoretados
INVITED REVIEW
Supervised tooth brushing is more effective than non-s
There is inconclusive evidence that the use of fluorida
paste in
Guidelines on the use of fluoride for caries prevention young children is associated with an increas
in children:
an updated EAPD policy document fluorosis
K. J. Toumba1 · S. Twetman2 · C. Splieth3 · C. Parnell4 · C. van Loveren5 · N. Α. Lygidakis6
Dada a importância desta medida para a prevenção das doenças orais, é também
recomendada a sua realização, diariamente, em ambiente escolar. “
—> diminuindo a desigualdade
Fonte: h]ps://nocs.pt/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/PNPSO-MAIO2021.pdf
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00464-2
INVITED REVIEW
Abstract
Aim To update the exisitng European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) 2009 fluoride guidelines.
Methods Experts met in Athens, Greece duirng November 2018 for the following groups: I Fluoride toothpastes, II Fluoride
gels, rinses and varnishes, III Fluoridated milk, fluoridated salt, tablets/lozenges and drops, IV Water fluoridation. Systematic
reviews and meta-analyses were reviewed and discussed for each of the groups. The GRADE system was used to assess the
quality of evidence which was judged as HIGH, MODERATE, LOW or VERY LOW based on the assessment of eight criteria
which can influence the confidence of the results. Following the quality assessment, GRADE was then used to indicate the
strength of recommendation for each fluoride agent as STRONG or WEAK/CONDITIONAL.
Results Parents must be strongly advised to apply an age-related amount of toothpaste and assist/supervise tooth brushing
until at least 7 years of age. The EAPD strongly endorses the daily use of fluoride as a major part of any comprehensive
programme for the prevention and control of dental caries in children. Regardless of the type of programme, community
or individually based, the use of fluoride must be balanced between the estimation of caries-risk and the possible risks of
adverse effects of the fluorides. Fluoride use is considered safe when the manufacturer’s instructions are followed. Preventive
programmes should be re-evaluated at regular intervals and adapted to a patient’s or population’s needs and risks.
Conclusions For the majority of European Countries, the EAPD recommends the appropriate use of fluoride toothpaste in
conjunction with good oral hygiene to be the basic fluoride regimen.
Background considerations
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00464-2
INVITED REVIEW
Abstract
Aim To update the exisitng European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) 2009 fluoride guidelines.
Methods Experts met in Athens, Greece duirng November 2018 for the following groups: I Fluoride toothpastes, II Fluoride
gels, rinses and varnishes, III Fluoridated milk, fluoridated salt, tablets/lozenges and drops, IV Water fluoridation. Systematic
reviews and meta-analyses were reviewed and discussed for each of the groups. The GRADE system was used to assess the
quality of evidence which was judged as HIGH, MODERATE, LOW or VERY LOW based on the assessment of eight criteria
which can influence the confidence of the results. Following the quality assessment, GRADE was then used to indicate the
strength of recommendation for each fluoride agent as STRONG or WEAK/CONDITIONAL.
Results Parents must be strongly advised to apply an age-related amount of toothpaste and assist/supervise tooth brushing
until at least 7 years of age. The EAPD strongly endorses the daily use of fluoride as a major part of any comprehensive
programme for the prevention and control of dental caries in children. Regardless of the type of programme, community
or individually based, the use of fluoride must be balanced between the estimation of caries-risk and the possible risks of
adverse effects of the fluorides. Fluoride use is considered safe when the manufacturer’s instructions are followed. Preventive
programmes should be re-evaluated at regular intervals and adapted to a patient’s or population’s needs and risks.
Conclusions For the majority of European Countries, the EAPD recommends the appropriate use of fluoride toothpaste in
conjunction with good oral hygiene to be the basic fluoride regimen.
Background considerations
ü Grão de arroz
< 2 anos
ü Aproximadamente 1 cm de denBfrico
Caries (dental decay) is a disease of the hard ;ssues of the teeth caused by an
imbalance, over ;me, in the interac;ons between cariogenic bacteria in dental
plaque and fermentable carbohydrates (mainly sugars). Regular toothbrushing
with fluoride toothpaste is the principal non-professional interven;on to
prevent caries, but the caries-preven;ve effect varies according to different
concentra;ons of fluoride in toothpaste, with higher concentra;ons associated
with increased caries control. Toothpastes with higher fluoride concentra;on
increases the risk of fluorosis (enamel defects) in developing teeth. This is an
update of the Cochrane Review first published in 2010.
ObjecPves
Authors' conclusions
This Cochrane Review supports the benefits of using fluoride
toothpaste in prevenPng caries when compared to non-fluoride
toothpaste. Evidence for the effects of different fluoride
concentraPons is more limited, but a dose-response effect was
observed for D(M)FS in children and adolescents. For many
comparisons of different concentraPons the caries-prevenPve
effects and our confidence in these effect esPmates are uncertain
and could be challenged by further research. The choice of fluoride
toothpaste concentraPon for young children should be balanced
against the risk of fluorosis.
Métodos de auto aplicação do flúor – gel de flúor
• Protocolos prevenPvos
Pacientes com patologias sistémicas com compromePmento
do fluxo salivar
Não são tão eficázes como os dentifricos
A nivel comunitário
Abstract
o Risco de cárie
o Exposição sistémica ao flúor —> águas fluoretadas
o Exposição tópica —> dentifricos, gel, bochehos
Caries Res. 2016;50 Suppl 1:61-7. doi: 10.1159/000443186.
The Public Health Reach of High Fluoride Vehicles: Examples of
InnovaPve Approaches
Abstract
This ar-cle reviews current evidence on the effec-veness of silver diamine
fluoride (SDF) as a caries arres-ng and preven-ve agent. It provides clinical
recommenda-ons around SDF's appropriate use as part of a comprehensive
caries management program. Systema-c reviews confirm that SDF is
effec-ve for caries arrest on cavitated lesions in primary teeth and root
caries in the elderly. It may also prevent new lesions.
Applica-on is easy, noninvasive, affordable, and safe.
Although it stains the lesions dark as it arrests them, it provides clinicians
with an addi-onal tool for caries management when esthe-cs are not a
primary concern.
Diamino Fluoreto de Prata (DFP)