Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DEPARTAMENTO DE
ARMACOLOGIA
BMF 0120
INTERAÇÃO FÁRMACO-RECEPTOR
E MECANISMOS DE TRANSDUÇÃO
Leticia Veras Costa Lotufo
Departamento de Farmacologia
Email: costalotufo@gmail.com
MECANISMOS DE TRANSDUÇÃO
MECANISMO
EFEITO
FÁRMACO RECEPTOR DE
BIOLÓGICO
TRANSDUÇÃO
AFINIDADE è EFICÁCIA
ASPECTOS MOLECULARES DA AÇÃO DO FÁRMACOS
1
24/04/22
ALVOS FARMACOLÓGICOS OU
RECEPTORES
“macromolécula (ou complexa macromolecular) com o
qual a molécula interage para produzir uma resposta
celular (i.e. uma alteração da função celular)”
Goodman & Gilman (12a. Edição - 2012)
LOCALIZAÇÃO DO RECEPTOR
s, fatty acid derivatives, and even dissolved
n monoxide. Most of these signal molecules
(A) CELL-SURFACE RECEPTORS
Forte relação com a natureza química do
plasma membrane
ace by exocytosis from the signaling cell, as cell-surface
receptor protein
fármaco:
wever, are emitted by diffusion through the
whereas others are displayed on the external
Hidrossolúveis – baixa
ed to it, providing a signal to other cells only permeabilidade celular
mbrane signal proteins may operate in this Lipossolúveis – alta permeabilidade
may be released from the signaling cell’s sur-
act at a distance.
hydrophilic signal
molecule target cell celular
gnal, the target cell responds by means of a
(B) INTRACELLULAR RECEPTORS
olecule and then initiates a response in the
eptor has a complex structure that is shaped small, hydrophobic Implicações:
signal molecule
h high specificity, helping to ensure that the Farmacocinética – absorção,
priate signal and not to the many other sig-
ll. Many signal molecules act at very low con- carrier protein
target cell transporte, eliminação,
their receptors usually bind them with high metabolismo
0–8 M; see Figure 3–44). Farmacodinâmica – Tipo de
smembrane proteins on the target-cell sur-
xtracellular signal molecule (a ligand), they receptores
ous intracellular signals that alter the behav- nucleus
eptor proteins are inside the target cell, and intracellular receptor protein
RECEPTORES DE MEMBRANA
TRNSDUÇÃO DO SINAL
814 Chapter 15: Cell Signaling
EFFECTOR PROTEINS
5 signaling to cells far away; others signal only to immediate neighbors. Most cells
in multicellular organisms both emit and receive signals. Reception of the signals
depends on receptor proteins, usually (but not always) at the cell surface, which
bind the signal molecule. The binding activates the receptor, which in turn acti-
vates one or more intracellular signaling pathways or systems. These systems
depend on intracellular signaling proteins, which process the signal inside the
MBoC6 m15.01/15.01
receiving cell and distribute it to the appropriate intracellular targets. The tar-
gets that lie at the end of signaling pathways are generally called effector proteins,
which are altered in some way by the incoming signal and implement the appro-
priate change in cell behavior. Depending on the signal and the type and state of
the receiving cell, these effectors can be transcription regulators, ion channels,
SINALIZAÇÃO
components of a metabolic pathway, or parts of the cytoskeleton (Figure 15–1).
The fundamental features of cell signaling have been conserved throughout the
evolution of the eukaryotes. In budding yeast, for example, the response to mating
factor depends on cell-surface receptor proteins, intracellular GTP-binding pro-
teins, and protein kinases that are clearly related to functionally similar proteins
UM TRANSMISSOR
in animal cells. Through – MÚLTIPLOS
gene duplication and EFEITOS
divergence, however, the signaling
systemsFatores a considerar:
in animals have become muchTipomore
de receptor, localozação,
elaborate than etc…
those in yeasts; the
human genome, for example, contains more than 1500 genes that encode recep-
tor proteins, and the number of different receptor proteins is further increased by
530 CHAPTER 16alternative RNA splicing and post-translational modifications.
Cell Signaling
A
24/04/22
7 because the signal exerts its effects by altering the concentrations of intracellular
molecules that are short-lived (unstable), undergoing continual turnover. Thus,
once the extracellular signal is gone, the degradation of the old molecules quickly
wipes out all traces of the signal’s action. It follows that the speed with which a cell
responds to signal removal depends on the rate of destruction, or turnover, of the
intracellular molecules that the signal affects.
It is also true, although much less obvious, that this turnover rate can deter-
536 PLASTICIDADE DA SINALIZAÇÃO
mine the promptness of the response when an extracellular signal arrives. Con-
sider, for example, CHAPTER 16 Cell Signaling
two intracellular MBoC6 m15.06/15.13
signaling molecules, X and Y, both of which
are normally maintained at
Figure 16–13 Intracellular signaling
proteins can relay, amplify, integrate, a steady-state concentration of 1000 molecules per extracellular signal molecule
receptor protein
cell. The cell synthesizes
example, a receptor protein and degrades molecule Y at a rate of 100 molecules per
and distribute the incoming signal. In this
A.S. Pupo et al. / Pharmacological Research 112 (2016) 49–57
located on
53
plasma membrane
PRIMARY
second, with each molecule having
the cell surface transduces an extracellular
signal into an intracellular signal, which an average lifetime of 10 seconds. Molecule X CYTOSOL
TRANSDUCTION
centration to fall by half if all synthesis were stopped (Figure 15–14). DISTRIBUTE
The same principles apply to proteins and small molecules, whether the mol-
ecules are in the extracellular space or inside cells. Many intracellular proteins
have short half-lives, some surviving for less than 10 minutes. In most cases, these
are key regulatory proteins whose concentrations are rapidly controlled in the cell ALTERED
METABOLISM
ALTERED CELL
SHAPE OR
ALTERED
GENE
MOVEMENT EXPRESSION
by changes in their rates of synthesis.
As we have Essentialseen, many Cell Biology. Alberts ettoal.,extracellular
cell responses 2013, 4th edition. signals depend on the
conversion of intracellular signalingProteins proteins that actfrom an
as molecular inactive
switches fallto an into
mostly active
one of form,
two
8 rather than on their synthesis or degradation. classes. The first—and by far the largest—class consists of proteins that
Phosphorylation
are activated or inactivated by phosphorylation,or the binding
a chemical modification of
discussed in Chapter 4 (see Figure 4–42). For these molecules, the switch
GTP, for example, commonly activates signaling
is thrown in one directionproteins. Even
by a protein kinase, whichincovalently
theseattaches
cases,
Fig. 2. Schematic representation of differences of potency and efficacy in biased agonism. Agonist A has higher potency/efficacy than agonist B in pathway 1, but lower
(A)
and continuously reversed (by dephos-
a phosphate group onto the switch protein, and in the other direction
by a protein phosphatase, which takes the phosphate off again (Figure
ECB4 e16.13/16.13
ENZIMAS
Enzimas - Exemplos
10
5
24/04/22
11
ASPIRINA - CICLOOXIGENASE
https://tmedweb.tulane.edu/pharmwiki/doku.
php/non-selective_cox_1_2_inhibitors
12
6
24/04/22
13
INIBIDORES DA ANGIOTENSINA II
Inibidores da ECA
• captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, quinapril, ramipril, benzapril,
moexipril, fosipril, trandolapril, perindopril
• Maioria são pro-drogas, com exceção do captopril
• Ativação por enzimas hepáticas
• Importância da farmacologia brasileira
Enalapril
Captopril
lisinopril
14
7
24/04/22
INIBIDORES DA ANGIOTENSINA II
Inibidores da ECA
• Bloqueiam a conversão da
angiotensina I em
angiotensina II
• Inibem a degradação da
bradicinina que é um
potente vasodilatador.
• Ação principal envolve
diminuição da resistência Ações da angiotensina II:
vascular periférica. • Vasoconstrição direta
• Aumento da descarga simpática
• Liberação de aldosterona
• Alterações renais
15
ESTATINAS
Mecanismo de ação:
• são inibidores da 3-hidroxi-3-
metilgluratil-coenzima A (HMG-CoA)
redutase (enzima da síntese de
colesterol)
• A diminuição da síntese de
colesterol causa up-regulation do
receptor de LDL
• Principal efeito terapêutico:
remoção do LDL do plasma.
• Reduzem triglicerídeos por redução
da secreção de VLDL e aumentando
seu clearance
16
8
24/04/22
EXEMPLOS
17
MOLÉCULAS TRANSPORTADORAS
18
9
24/04/22
Transportadores – Exemplos:
19
Mecanismo de ação
aa
aa
E
hidroxilase
MAO
AAADC b
interm NT MET
VMAT
NT
NE, 5-HT
5-TH
T
ADT
20
10
24/04/22
CANAIS IÔNICOS
CANAIS IÔNICOS
BLOQUEIO DA
BLOQUEADORES PERMEAÇÃO
AUMENTO OU
DIMINUIÇÃO DA
MODULADORES PROBABILIDADE DE
ABERTURA
21
22
11
Structure Potency (Procaine = 1) Duration of Action
Esters
Cocaine O O CH3 2 Medium
C N CH3
24/04/22
O
C O
C2H5
C4H9 CH3
ANESTÉSICOS LOCAIS
O
Amides
Lidocaine (Xylocaine) CH3 4 Medium
O C2H5
NH C CH2 N
C2H5
CH3
• Bloqueam a condução
CH3 nervosa CH3
Bupivacaine CH3 16 Long
(Marcaine), O
Levobupivacaine
NH C
(Chirocaine)
N
CH3
C4H9
NH C
N
CH3
C3H7
NH C CH NH C3H7
O
S
C OCH
1
23
Other chemical types are available including ethers (pramoxine), ketones (dyclonine), and phenetidin derivatives (phenacaine).
2
Data not found.
RECEPTORES
Abertura e
RECEPTORES Direto fechamento de
canais iônicos
Ativação/Inibição
enzimática
Agonista Mecanismo de
Modulação de canais
transdução
iônicos
Transcrição do DNA
Sem efeito
Antagonista Ação farmacológicas: bloqueio dos
mediadores endógenos
24
12
24/04/22
RECEPTORES
25
26
13
24/04/22
Exemplo: nACHR
Homomérico Heteromérico
• Formado por subunidades: α
(2 a 5), β (1-3), γ e δ
• Subunidade α – ligação da
Extracelular
acetilcolina
• Canal permeável a cátions
Intracelular • Influxo de Na+
• Despolarização na célula pós
sináptica
27
28
14
24/04/22
Exemplos
Antagonistas nicotínicos
Fármaco Sítio principal Tipo de ação
Hexametônio Gânglios autonômicos Bloqueio da
transmissão
trimetafana Gânglios autonômicos Bloqueio da
transmissão
Tubocurarina Junção neuromuscular Bloqueio da
transmissão
Pancurônio Junção neuromuscular Bloqueio da
Atracurio transmissão
Vecurônio
Rang HP et al. Rang & Dale Farmacologia. 7a. Edição. Elsevier, 2012.
29
BENZODIAZEPÍNICOS
Sítio do • 1950: síntese CDZ
GABA Sternbach
Clordiazepóxido-
. 1960: introdução na
Introduzido em 1960
clínica
1977: descoberta dos
sítios BDZ – Mohler &
Okada
Sítio
BDZ
30
15
24/04/22
Domínios de ligação
Domínio de
ligação na
proteína G
31
PASSO A PASSO:
1. Ativação do receptor -
Agonista
agonista
2. GTP desloca GDP
3. Liga/ativa outra proteína
(enzima/canal iônico)
4. Ativa enzima e continua via
de sinalização
5. Atividade GTPásica
32
16
24/04/22
FUNÇÃO DA PROTEÍNA G
33
Canais iônicos
PI3K
Fosfolipase
Adenil ciclase
Receptores quinase
34
17
24/04/22
35
ciclase
2. ATP é convertido em Membrana
AMPcíclico
3. Ativa proteína
quinase A (PKA)
4. Fosforilação de
substratos
5. Via inibitória – Gi –
diminui atividade da Resposta
Adenil ciclase
Katzung et al., 2011. Basic and Clinic Pharmacology. 11a. edição
36
18
24/04/22
activated
α subunit intracellular signaling molecules inositol trisphosphate and diacylglycerol.
of G protein Inositol trisphosphate, in turn, promotes the accumulation of cytosolic
Ca2+—yet another small intracellular signaling molecule.
Adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C are activated by different types of
SECOND MESSENGER MOLECULES G proteins, allowing cells to couple the production of these small intra-
DIFFUSE TO ACT ON INTRACELLULAR cellular signaling molecules to different extracellular signals. Although
SIGNALING PROTEINS
the coupling may be either stimulatory or inhibitory—as we saw in our
discussion of the actions of cholera toxin and pertussis toxin—we con-
centrate here on G proteins that stimulate enzyme activity.
The small intracellular signaling molecules generated by these enzymes
are often called small messengers, or second messengers—the “first mes-
sengers” being the extracellular signals that activated the enzymes in
the first place. Once activated, the enzymes generate large quantities of
small messengers, which rapidly diffuse away from their source, thereby
ECB4 e16.20/16.22 amplifying and spreading the intracellular signal (Figure 16–22).
Different small messenger molecules produce different responses. We
first examine the consequences of an increase in the cytosolic concen-
tration of cyclic AMP. This will take us along one of the main types of
signaling pathways that lead from the activation of GPCRs. We then
Essential Cell Biology. Alberts et al., 2013, 4th edition.
discuss the actions of three other small messenger molecules—inositol
trisphosphate, diacylglycerol, and Ca2+—which will lead us along a dif-
ferent signaling route.
37
NH2
The Cyclic AMP Signaling Pathway Can Activate Enzymes
N
N and Turn On Genes
O O O
_ N N Many extracellular signals acting via GPCRs affect the activity of the
O P O P O P O CH2 O
_ _ _ enzyme adenylyl cyclase and thus alter the intracellular concentration
O O O ATP of the small messenger molecule cyclic AMP. Most commonly, the acti-
vated G-protein subunit switches on the adenylyl cyclase, causing a
OH OH dramatic and sudden increase in the synthesis of cyclic AMP from ATP
adenylyl
NH2 (which is always present in the cell). Because it stimulates the cyclase, G-Protein-Coupled Receptors
ECB4 e16.21/16.23
NUCLEUS
active inactive
PKA transcription
regulator
activated, phosphorylated
transcription regulator
P
activated target gene
acetylcholine +
plasma membrane closed K channel
(A)
GTP activated
βγ complex
activated α subunit +
+
K CHANNEL open K channel
+
OPENING K
EXTRACELLULAR SPACE
(B)
Figure 16–21 A Gi protein directly
CYTOSOL
couples receptor activation to the
opening of K+ channels in the plasma
GTP
membrane of heart pacemaker cells.
(A) Binding of the neurotransmitter
acetylcholine to its GPCR on the heart
G-PROTEIN cells results in the activation of the
Pi INACTIVATION;
+ G protein, Gi. (B) The activated complex
K CHANNEL
CLOSING
+
closed K channel directly opens a K+ channel in the plasma
membrane, increasing its permeability to
K+ and thereby making the membrane
(C) harder to activate and slowing the heart
rate. (C) Inactivation of the subunit by
inactive hydrolysis of its bound GTP returns the
G protein GDP G protein to its inactive state, allowing the
K+ channel to close.
39
ECB4 E16.19/16.21
1. Ativação da
Fosfolipase C
Membrana
2. PIP2 é convertido
em IP3 e DAG
3. IP3 libera Ca+2 –
ativa Calmodulina
4. DAG estimula PKC
5. Fosforilação de
substratos
Resposta
40
20
24/04/22
42
21
24/04/22
they use.
OFF
1. Ion-channel-coupled receptors change the permeability of the
GEF
plasma membrane to selected ions, thereby altering the membrane GDP Pi
potential and, if the conditions are right, producing an electrical
current (Figure 16–17A). GDP
GTP GAP
2. G-protein-coupled receptors activate membrane-bound, trimeric
GTP-binding proteins (G proteins), which then activate (or inhibit) ON
an enzyme or an ion channel in the plasma membrane, initiating GTP
an intracellular signaling cascade (Figure 16–17B).
3. Enzyme-coupled receptors either act as enzymes or associate ACTIVE
MONOMERIC GTPase
with enzymes inside the cell (Figure 16–17C); when stimulated,
the enzymes can activate a wide variety of intracellular signaling
pathways. Figure 16–16 The activity of monom
GTP-binding proteins is controlled b
44 The number of different types of receptors in each of these three classes two types of regulatory proteins. Gu
is even greater than the number of extracellular signals that act on them. nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs)
ECB4
promote the m15.19/16.16
exchange of GDP for GTP
This is because for many extracellular signal molecules there is more
thereby switching the GTP-binding pro
than one type of receptor, and these may belong to different receptor
on. GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs)
classes. The neurotransmitter acetylcholine, for example, acts on skel- stimulate the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP
etal muscle cells via an ion-channel-coupled receptor, whereas in heart 22
thereby switching the GTP-binding
cells it acts through a G-protein-coupled receptor. These two types of protein off.
24/04/22
Agonismo tendencioso
45
Agonismo tendencioso
50 A.S. Pupo et al. / Pharmacological Research 112 (2016) 49–57
Fig. 2. Schematic representation of differences of potency and efficacy in biased agonism. Agonist A has higher potency/efficacy than agonist B in pathway 1, but lower
potency/efficacy than agonist B in pathway 2.
46
23
24/04/22
Agonismo tendencioso
Fig. 2. Schematic representation of differences of potency and efficacy in biased agonism. Agonist A has higher potency/efficacy than agonist B in pathway 1, but lower
potency/efficacy than agonist B in pathway 2.
47
Exemplo
54 A.S. Pupo et al. / Pharmacological Research 112 (2016) 49–57
Fig. 3. Assessment of noradrenaline and oxymetazoline G protein-dependent signaling in !1A adrenergic receptor. Concentration-response curves for intracellular calcium
mobilization (A) and Gq activation (B) on HEK293T cells transiently transfected with !1A adrenergic receptor and stimulated with increasing amounts of noradrenaline or
oxymetazoline.
nist is noradrenaline [1]. If concentration-response curves for the 4. Perspectives for biased agonism application
internalization induced by oxymetazoline and noradrenaline are
performed at 30 min of agonist incubation, oxymetazoline is con- Despite the increasing complexity of what can be considered
sidered a full agonist for human !1A-adrenoceptor internalization, biased agonism as above discussed, discovery of ligand bias, as
whereas noradrenaline is inactive at this specific time point [1], a general concept of a broader capability of signaling, has raised
giving the false impression that noradrenaline is absolutely biased speculations about the possibility of achieving pharmacological
toward Gq signaling versus receptor internalization. profiles distinct from those classically related to agonists or antago-
Recently, at least three useful pharmacological parameters were nists [44,83]. Biased agonists so far described have shown ability to
48 proposed for the quantification of biased agonism, the Intrinsic Rel- emphasize a beneficial cellular signal, to de-emphasize a debilitat-
ative Activity (RAi , [29]) ratios, the bias factor " [70] and the log Bias ing signal, or to de-emphasize a debilitating signal while blocking
or !!log #/KA [46]. Because of space constraints, the reader will the capacity of the endogenous agonist to produce the signal [45].
be referred to the specific literature above for the mathematical The development of novel GPCR drugs with potentially
grounds of each of them. A common feature of all three parame- increased efficacy and/or fewer on-target adverse effects has
ters is that they relate functional estimates of ligands efficacy and already prompted a few compounds into clinical trials. The first
affinity and assume that changes in its ratios in two or more signal- one being tested in humans against an unbiased ligand is TRV130,
ing pathways result from agonist directed stabilization of different a G protein biased agonist (versus "-arrestin-2) that binds to the
receptor conformations. $ opioid receptor (MOR) and produces analgesia comparable to
The most straightforward in terms of calculation is the Intrinsic
Relative Activity (RAi ) ratio described by [29] that only requires the
that of morphine [16]. Preclinical studies have suggested that opi-
oid analgesia is associated with G!i coupling at the MOR, whereas 24
knowledge of Maximal Effect (Emax) and pEC50 as combined sur- gastrointestinal dysfunction, respiratory depression and tolerance
rogates of efficacy and affinity of agonists in two of the triggered to the analgesic effect are all linked to "-arrestin-2 recruitment
signaling pathways. However, when the Hill coefficients of the log [13,12,39,69,56,89,26].
concentration-response curves differ from 1.0, RAi ratios will be On the other side, a potent "-arrestin biased ligand of the
largely affected by cell dependent interferences such as receptor angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1 R) [82], referred to as TRV027, is
densities and coupling efficiencies (reviewed in Refs. [29,46]) . For currently being investigated in Phase 2b as an intravenous drug
24/04/22
DESSENSIBILIZAÇÃO Agonista
específica)
Fosforilação de
– Papel da GRK Receptor
fosforilado
receptores
(Não-específica)
– Arrestina
• Heteróloga (cruzada)
– Papel de quinases Complexo
Receptor-arrestina
HOMÓLOGA HETERÓLOGA
RANG et al., 2012. Farmacologia, 7a edição
49
RECICLAGEM
Agonista no espaço extracelular
Lisossomos
Endossomos
50
25
24/04/22
51
52
26
24/04/22
53
REFERÊNCIAS
• Bibliografia básica:
– Rang HP et al. Rang & Dale Farmacologia. 7a.
Edição. Elsevier, 2012.
– Katzung BG et al. Farmacologia Básica e Clínica.
11a. edição. MgGraw Hill – Artmed, 2013.
– Alberts, B. et al. Essential Cell Biology. 4th edition.
Garland Science, 2013.
54
27